Jump to content
Objectivism Online Forum

Reblogged:What's Wrong With DeSantis

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

The man to watch in the next presidential campaign, given Trump's unfortunate hold on the GOP, is Florida's Governor, Ron DeSantis. He has an excellent chance of winning the nomination as things stand because of four things: (1) He is very popular with Trumpists; (2) He stands up to media, but has better self-control and a far more professional demeanor than Trump; (3) He sounds superficially like the classical liberal better Republicans and voters like me wish were on the ballot; and (4) His handling of the pandemic, simply by being relatively sane, makes him much more attractive as a President than most other, more blatantly despotic governors.

All of these things become apparent in a favorable piece in the Washington Examiner.

If any one politician "won" the pandemic, it was he:

Republican strategist Michael DeVanney says the event broke fundraising and attendance records. "We would have had more, but we were limited to 750 people," he said. The event was initially capped at 450, but Gov. Tom Wolf eased restrictions a few days before, and the extra 300 seats sold out in a single day. "DeSantis is seen as a governor who got how you manage your state during a pandemic right, especially on nursing homes and opening up businesses," DeVanney said, adding, "It resonates and it will resonate elsewhere. Pittsburgh is a great place to have confirmed that." [bold added]
And the below -- which reminds me of good-sounding editorials of his I remember reading -- illustrates why I saw potential in him at one point:
DeSantis says the country faces severe challenges emerging from the national emergencies of the pandemic. He was shocked by how easily so many people gave up their basic freedoms when the panic hit. "Our adversaries are looking at how the West responded to this," he said. "And they're thinking, 'Man, if we can instill panic and fear, we can get them to close down their whole society, cripple the strongest economy in the world, like the United States did.'" [bold added]
You might be thinking: Finally, we have a politician who appreciates what freedom means and has a chance to win! You would be wrong about part of that:
cruise.jpg
Looking set to cruise to victory, DeSantis, shows his true colors with the cruise companies. (Image by Josiah Weiss, via Unsplash, license.)
He is also tussling with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention over "vaccine passports," but on this, DeSantis is on the side of his state rather than of majority opinion. He pushed to fine cruise lines that refuse to accept unvaccinated passengers. The CDC wants ships to meet a high threshold of vaccinated passengers on each cruise. A compromise is likely, and the public is on the side of the CDC: 80% of cruise enthusiasts want the restrictions. It's an early reminder to DeSantis that his gubernatorial imperatives will sometimes clash with his desire to extend his national appeal. [The cruise lines recently caved, despite the fact that they had better legal ground. --ed] [bold added]
So much for the property and speech rights of businessmen -- and everyone else for that matter, and so much for the governor's lip service to freedom. He has no more right than the CDC to impose a vaccination policy on a cruise line. Do not be fooled by the fact that his position differs in concrete detail from the one favored by the left.

-- CAV

Link to Original

Link to post
Share on other sites

"So much for the property and speech rights of businessmen -- and everyone else for that matter, and so much for the governor's lip service to freedom."

 

In the context of cruise line regulation , are the 'rights' of businessmen and any other member of public being abused by the regulations eg absent strict laissez faire are rights not being protected under any form of economic regulation? I'm sure there are 'anarcap" arguments that could be made in that vein. But given the current regulation regime I see DeSantis's concerns as focused on the public and protecting their rights to interstate travel. And especially in light of the EUA status of the 'jabs', until they are recognized as fully 'legal' vaccines, the argument seems to be that you can not force someone to forego commerce because they have decided to not engage in experimental medical procedures.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...