Inspector Posted February 2, 2005 Report Share Posted February 2, 2005 Another note: JMeganSnow, I have presented my argument in a concise if-this-then-that format. If you want to actually get to the heart of the matter, then it is imperative that you show me which premise or deduction you disagree with and why, rather than just condemning my conclusion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMeganSnow Posted February 2, 2005 Report Share Posted February 2, 2005 Another note: JMeganSnow, I have presented my argument in a concise if-this-then-that format. If you want to actually get to the heart of the matter, then it is imperative that you show me which premise or deduction you disagree with and why, rather than just condemning my conclusion. I have demonstrated, through my arguing about what determines a mistake, through presentation of examples, through pointing out deficiencies in your reasoning, and through establishing what other behaviors your line of thinking would necessarily advocate, PRECISELY where I disagreed. Your intellectual dishonesty in this matter first became clear to me when you used the rhetorical formulation "But surely . . ." and then, when I called you on it, insisted it was an HONEST question. This indicates either you are lying or you possess an inadequate command of the English language. I chose to assume it was the latter largely because you have a high post count and if you used these "tactics" often someone would probably have called you on it. Certainly anyone can make statements in haste that later turn out to lack an adequate degree of precision. That question, indeed, was entirely unnecessary because the issue I was debating was not the question of a "one-night-stand" but your blanket condemnation of anyone engaging in sexual activity with more than one person. You chose to bring up the second issue, and then in later posts, combine them and complain that my statements about the first issue don't prove my "point" about the SECOND issue. This also indicates that you are either intentionally attempting to muddy the waters through dishonesty or that you failed to follow the thread of the conversation. Once again, I assumed the latter. Generosity, after all. I decided at this point, however, that I would abandon the conversation as I did not see anything else being accomplished, but the guilt-mongering post appalled me. Guilt-mongering is a vile and unethical practice, manipulating someone into feeling something and then using these feelings to replace reason. That does indeed qualify as intellectual dishonesty. These are, as I said, the conclusions I have arrived at, and I do not consider your word to have any bearing on the matter, as I have evaluated that you have no interest in establishing an accurate picture of what Objectivism actually advocates; instead being only determined to proselytize your view via whatever tactics, however base. If someone else wishes to intervene on Inspector's behalf to explain how I have misinterpreted, that is fine. I have stated my views and I consider everything he has to say on this issue suspect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dominique Posted February 2, 2005 Report Share Posted February 2, 2005 I am glad to see you accept the idea that a proper romantic couple should at least be operating on the premise that they are at least pretty sure they will be spending the rest of their lives together; i.e. that the goal of any proper romantic relationship is that it be the highest, final relationship of one's life. Stop right there and don't even read the rest of my post if you disagree with the above. I agreed when I first read it, but now as I go through the thread I see the problem. When you said "How do you feel about that relationship now? It sounds like you are not and that you regret having it (a perfectly correct attitude)." as Meagan pointed out, you implied that mistake=regret, and that a person ought to feel guilty over their mistakes. I don't feel regret about the mistakes I made honestly, because I learned something from all of it, and learning is a process. A person has no need to feel guilty over mistakes of this kind. You are equating the wrong things. I'll read more and see if i can't be more specific Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMeganSnow Posted February 2, 2005 Report Share Posted February 2, 2005 Given this definition, one could call a failed relationship a mistake because the people entering the relationship are not completely certain about the other person (although they should have some degree of certainty, as has already been discussed). The fact they do not have complete certainty, the fact that they are not omniscient and cannot predict the future (such as if the person they currently love will change for the worse in the future), implies that they are using"deficient knowledge" in the decision they are making. You could, but you would then be indicating that the factors you pointed to (that people are not omnsicient and cannot predict the future) are a deficiency. These are not a deficiency in humans, they are a metaphysically given FACT. Failure to possess knowledge that can only be acquired through means that humans cannot possess (and not DO NOT possess, specifically CANNOT) cannot be a deficiency. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inspector Posted February 2, 2005 Report Share Posted February 2, 2005 Your intellectual dishonesty in this matter first became clear to me when you used the rhetorical formulation "But surely . . ." and then, when I called you on it, insisted it was an HONEST question. It WAS. I did not honestly think that you would dispute the point that followed "but surely..." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inspector Posted February 2, 2005 Report Share Posted February 2, 2005 Guilt-mongering is a vile and unethical practice, manipulating someone into feeling something and then using these feelings to replace reason. That does indeed qualify as intellectual dishonesty. If that is how you define "Guilt-mongering" then it is indeed unethical. I was thinking that the term meant simply "seeking to induce guilt." Under either definition, however, I was not guilt-mongering. I was asking the question "do you feel guilt?" and following it with an assurance that if she did, it would be "okay" to, and that no harm would come from admitting it, since it would be a perfectly reasonable thing to feel. The rest of what you said, about mixing up all the points and arguments, ...I don't even know what you're trying to say. My, my, what a monster you paint me as, JMeganSnow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inspector Posted February 2, 2005 Report Share Posted February 2, 2005 You could, but you would then be indicating that the factors you pointed to (that people are not omnsicient and cannot predict the future) are a deficiency. These are not a deficiency in humans, they are a metaphysically given FACT. Failure to possess knowledge that can only be acquired through means that humans cannot possess (and not DO NOT possess, specifically CANNOT) cannot be a deficiency. I was not ever claiming that a person should feel guilty for making an error that it would have been IMPOSSIBLE for them not to have made. However, in all of your examples, a person has a question: "do I know enough about this person to know that it is proper to sleep with them?" and a choice: "either sleep with them or wait to gather more information." In the cases where it would have been less harmful to make the second choice (i.e. failed relationships), how was it IMPOSSIBLE for someone to have made the latter choice? If that choice would have resulted in the better outcome for them, how can you not call the act of making the other choice a "mistake?" You can qualify it all you like: ("understandable mistake") and some mistakes can be excused from lack of knowledge. But that does not eliminate the fact that a mistake is a mistake: it is something that you wish you hadn't done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dominique Posted February 2, 2005 Report Share Posted February 2, 2005 You could, but you would then be indicating that the factors you pointed to (that people are not omnsicient and cannot predict the future) are a deficiency. These are not a deficiency in humans, they are a metaphysically given FACT. Failure to possess knowledge that can only be acquired through means that humans cannot possess (and not DO NOT possess, specifically CANNOT) cannot be a deficiency. I think we have a semantics problem here. Unless I'm misunderstanding your intentions. When I said earlier about genorosity not being appropriate in response to a mistake, I meant that a mistake is a mistake, and by definition an accident, and not wrong. There is no reason to forgive it and no call to generosity in response. There is no intent in a mistake, you (meaning anyone-not you specifically)were going for one thing and ended up with something else. Your goals were in the right place, but your knowledge hadn't caught up yet, or knowledge of that kind was not possible. This is not a deficiency on your part, and requires no generosity of others except in their personal preference to not hang around people that make mistakes, but it isn't a *moral* judgement. Or is that what you are arguing? Whether a mistake should be judged morally or not? No it shouldn't. Oy, I'm confused. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dominique Posted February 2, 2005 Report Share Posted February 2, 2005 You can qualifyit all you like: ("understandable mistake") and some mistakes can be excused from lack of knowledge. But that does not eliminate the fact that a mistake is a mistake: it is something that you wish you hadn't done. I think you need to define mistake specifically In my mind it neccesarily means *accident*. Or like an error in judgement. It isn't willfull. Intent makes all the difference. How can you judge the morality of the type of mistakes when the peron should have known better? You can only say that the person themselves is willfully ignorant or evasive, and then wouldn't hang out with them, but to look at the act as the deciding factor of intent is backwords. And it doesn't affect the morality of the act, or the mistake, or anything. A mistake is a mistake, an evasion of the truth is immoral. They are not the same thing. I don't wish I hadn't made mistakes, I mean sure, it can be embarrassing, exopensive, what have you, but it's a lesson. When I look in my past and see somewhere that I was evading the facts of reality, I feel regret, but the individual acts are not moral or immoral neccesarily, what was immoral was my dishonesty, or my altruism, or whatever. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMeganSnow Posted February 2, 2005 Report Share Posted February 2, 2005 Dominique: Dictionary.com entries for "mistake" 1. An error or fault resulting from defective judgment, deficient knowledge, or carelessness. 2. A misconception or misunderstanding. Emphasis mine. A mistake is not necessarily an accident. It does require moral evaluation and judgement. You can never know someone's intent except through evaluating their actions, words, the result of their actions, etc.; i.e. through judging them. Disconnecting intent from result is a further instance of mind-body dichotomy. A subjectivist would say, "only intent matters", and an intrinsicist would say "the road to Hell is paved with good intentions." Taken together, it is another way to say "This is good in theory, but not in practice." However, even an accidental mistake can kill you. It requires significant generosity indeed not to dissociate oneself (or seek redress) from someone so careless. If you want an example: if a doctor allowed one of your loved ones to die through carelessness, how easy would it be for you to forgive him? Would he necessarily deserve your forgiveness (he may not deserve to have his license revoked, etc. But he hardly deserves that you embrace him in the spirit of friendship, either.) I'm going to do what you suggested earlier and start a new thread for this particular issue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inspector Posted February 2, 2005 Report Share Posted February 2, 2005 Intent makes all the difference. How can you judge the morality of the type of mistakes when the peron should have known better? You can only say that the person themselves is willfully ignorant or evasive, and then wouldn't hang out with them, but to look at the act as the deciding factor of intent is backwords. And it doesn't affect the morality of the act, or the mistake, or anything. A mistake is a mistake, an evasion of the truth is immoral. They are not the same thing. I don't wish I hadn't made mistakes, I mean sure, it can be embarrassing, exopensive, what have you, but it's a lesson. When I look in my past and see somewhere that I was evading the facts of reality, I feel regret, but the individual acts are not moral or immoral neccesarily, what was immoral was my dishonesty, or my altruism, or whatever. I think a mistake is a more general term encompassing decisions which produce outcomes which were not the goal of the decision-maker. Some mistakes happen because of immoral behavior on the part of the mistake-maker, and some don't. Other than that, I don't think I have stated anything that disagrees with your post, Dominique. I'm not saying that everyone who has made a mistake was at some point willfully immoral. The nature of induction is that we, as human beings often have to *guess,* and that means that we will sometimes guess wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dominique Posted February 2, 2005 Report Share Posted February 2, 2005 I think a mistake is a more general term encompassing decisions which produce outcomes which were not the goal of the decision-maker. Some mistakes happen because of immoral behavior on the part of the mistake-maker, and some don't. Yes, that's what I was after. Other than that, I don't think I have stated anything that disagrees with your post, Dominique. I'm not saying that everyone who has made a mistake was at some point willfully immoral. The nature of induction is that we, as human beings often have to *guess,* and that means that we will sometimes guess wrong. I clearly am missing the basis of you both's argument here, so I'll take it to the other thread to sort out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMeganSnow Posted February 2, 2005 Report Share Posted February 2, 2005 New thread is here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elle Posted February 3, 2005 Report Share Posted February 3, 2005 (edited) content edited to add to the new thread Edited February 3, 2005 by Elle Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deedlebee Posted February 3, 2005 Report Share Posted February 3, 2005 Continuing on with the original subject of this thread: I suppose that would be a result of being totally honest, wouldn't it? Honest to the facts of reality. Is this a separate character trait? Like Ambition, or Good Hygene, which can be learned? Because (I don't have my lexicon handy here but...) isn't desire an emotion, which can't be maintained? Self-improvement seems to fall under some other heading, but I'm not sure which one. I think desire might have been a poor word to use. What I meant by using it was "a willful drive". I do believe that honesty would help in this regard, but someone simply telling you "I wish you knew more so we could talk about something different" probably isn't the best motivator. If a person wants to continue improving himself over the course of his life, regardless of marital status, I'd say he's better off. Additionally, I would add Priority to a successful marriage. Making time to be with your spouse, even when it's difficult (especially if children are involved). You must enter into marriage knowing that if you are never able to have or adopt children, you will still be happy and fulfilled being married to the most amazing person you've ever known. Even if kids do come along, you must maintain the attitude that you are married first, a parent second. Even I, who have been reluctant towards the idea of children was surprised by this point of view. The author however, makes a very strong argument as to why priority towards the marriage is so vital. How does the ideal woman differ from the ideal man, and why?I'm still curious about this one. Is there anything besides the biological difference? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KevinD Posted February 3, 2005 Report Share Posted February 3, 2005 How does the ideal woman differ from the ideal man, and why? I'm still curious about this one. Is there anything besides the biological difference? That's a very big question, and it's asked in a somewhat strange way. The simple answer is that one is a man while the other is a woman — with everything that those facts entail. We're not bodies or minds; we're integrated beings of both. Now, what it means to be a man, versus being a woman, is something which has been discussed in this thread, and in others. Suffice it to say that basic virtues and qualities of character are not sexual characteristics, and apply equally to men and women. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EC Posted April 19, 2006 Report Share Posted April 19, 2006 (edited) [Mod's note: Merged with existing thread.] In another thread that I'm too lazy too try to link too, I started a "discussion" about better ways to create attraction in the fairer sex then the customary flowers and card BS. A LOT of what I said was misiterpreted, I believe. So I thought I would show a newsletter that I get via e-mail from a guy who goes by the name of David D. At first I was just going to post exerpts but this weeks e-mail is too good for that. It explains a lot of his techniques as well as responds to success stories and a couple e-mails from some ladies who hit him up too tell him how bad his ideas are. I personally think that this stuff with some minor "tweaking" here and there demonstrate's Objectivist male/female interactions flawlessly. This stuff works... and it does for the same reason Objectivism does, and the same reason a light went on in my head when I read both. They both conform perfectly with reality. Without further ado.... I'll let the Jedi Master himself speak........ Meeting Models, '10s', And Other Hot Women -------------------------------------------------- If you'd like to take yourself off of my dating tips email list, just click this link: http://DoubleYourDatingMail.com/f/?a84POf.ckiO7F.ZV9jbGF5.u If you want to sign up for this newsletter, just go to: www.DoubleYourDatingMethod.com -------------------------------------------------- Note: If you'd like to check out all of my different programs for helping you attract and meet women, just go here to see my online program list: http://www.DoubleYourDatingMethod.com/e/10280/Catalog/ ***QUESTION*** Hey Dave, how's it hanging? Read your stuff...interesting. Makes a lot of sense to appear different then all the others. I have one question, however. This C&F stuff (can I call it "friendly mocking"?) really only works on women who are sure of themselves and who will not take your jokes to the heart. But how many of those are in the world? I mean, with today's "perfect" pop-stars most women have at least some insecurities. So, how can you use this technique and not accidentally hit a weak spot? Is there a neutral C&F approach? J Brooklyn, NY >>>MY COMMENTS: I think you're hitting on an important point here. I think that a lot of guys "secretly" want to figure out a way to meet women without RISKING anything. This is probably why personal ads and online dating websites are so popular. The problem with not wanting to RISK anything is that it creates a mindset that leads to being AVERAGE. And "average" doesn't create ATTRACTION. I teach guys to use a specific kind of humor that I call "Cocky & Funny". One of the purposes of the Cocky & Funny technique is to clearly demonstrate that you are NOT intimidated by a woman, and to INSTANTLY communicate that you are DIFFERENT from other men. You'd like to know the magic way to "not accidentally hit a weak spot"... But guess what? Accidents happen. Risk is part of life. Don't worry so much about hitting a "weak spot" while you're teasing or busting on a woman... just concern yourself with making sure you're being FUNNY while you're doing it. If you meet a woman who is so sensitive that she can't take a joke, or you "accidentally" over do it, don't worry about it. No biggie. She's probably either too uptight or emotionally fragile for you to have a good time with anyway. If you want to make a cake, you have to break a few eggs, man. Remember, your objective isn't to be MEAN to women, or to hurt them... your objective is to use a specific type of humor to create ATTRACTION. And give up this "neutral" idea. Neutral is BORING. And Boring is NOT the way to create ATTRACTION. ***QUESTION*** David "The Man"-- First of all, your Advanced CD Series is THE most definitive exhaustive resource on dating ever written. It boggles my mind that nobody ever figured this stuff out before. You are the research scientist that broke the mold of all that bookstore fluff, the Darwin of Dating. I can now approach and get the email of a woman who would have made me shake in my boots just a few months ago. My most recent success was a girl I dated who I turned up the C+F to the max, but my old inner wussy made a brief appearance and that was that. Oh well. "Next!" I'll get better and better. I have improved quite a bit, but I'm looking for some guy friends as you suggest. However, I'm having a problem finding guys who are good with women. I'm not seeing them. All I see everywhere I go are wusses. Any thoughts or ideas? I've also thought about finding friends who are students of yours so we can get together for team efforts. Any suggestions here? Thanks again for the incredible impact you've had on my life. J. >>>MY COMMENTS: Yeah, I have one thought for you... This "Everywhere I go all I see is wusses" thing can be a challenge. I shake my head almost every single time I go out, because I think we're in the middle of a WUSS EPIDEMIC in this country. Keep looking. It's worth it. If you have to, ask friends and associates at work if they know any guys who are really good with women. And remember, be cool. Guys who are good with women often like to help other guys learn. But don't be a boat anchor around his neck... If you do your homework and find some guys who can help you, it will REALLY pay off. ***COMMENT FROM A WOMAN*** Sir, I received one of you Q&A emails by mistake, I'm sure. I am an intelligent, female professional and I reall-ll-ll-lly had a good laugh after reviewing your web site as well. If you think that ALL women will be turned on by these things, you are very mistaken. The classy, sophisticated, and well educated as well as intriguing and very attractive will have totally different opinions on all these subjects. I think you would do better to consider your experience as incomplete. However, I'm sure you are making an obscene amount of money by offering this misinformation for sale to men. Laughing Uncontrollably in Alaska >>>MY COMMENTS: An intelligent female professional that lives in ALASKA? Don't even get me started there... And since you seem to be claiming here that you're an AUTHORITY on "The classy, sophisticated, and well educated... as well as intriguing and very attractive" women... I have to ask you where you're getting this particular education... Alaska? Maybe those words mean something different where you're from. Whatever. Look, I used to be a "nice", sweet, BORING guy who did nice things for women, acted respectful, and generally was everything I thought a "good guy" should be. And my success with meeting and attracting women was horrible. I had a few good relationships with attractive women, but these were ACCIDENTAL. It only happened because I was in the right place at the right time, and because the women just happened to have NOTHING BETTER GOING ON. Now that I do what I teach, I'm able to attract beautiful women whenever I want. You do the math. ***COMMENT FROM A WOMAN*** Hey Dave, I forward your news letter to my ex-husband and to my other male friends and they all thanked me for it. I agree with all of your advice. It's kind of scary how well you read women. You have also helped me to realize what I'm attracted to and why. Take care! S MD >>>MY COMMENTS: Yeah, it's OK for you to admit that you're attracted to ME. I don't blame you. You forgot to include your picture, dear. Waiting patiently. Your friend, David D. P.S. Stop forwarding these emails to your Ex. It's bad enough that you love me... but to add insult to injury for the poor guy... ***SUCCESS STORY*** David, So, I go into a shoe store the other day and I'm just kind of browsing. The clerk-- a cutie of age 21--asks me if she can help me. I kindly ask her to get me a certain pair to try on. As I put the shoes on, she enthusiastically squeaked, "WOW THOSE SHOES LOOK GREAT ON YOU!!!". I mocked her in the same hi-pitch tone, "YOU'RE ON COMMISION YOU NEED TO SAY THAT!!" She gave me that playful little slap on the arm and told me I was "a little sh**". I go on teasing her for 5 minutes or so and she asks me if I would like a job at this store. When she gave me the application, she also hands me her HOME ADDRESS and phone number and asked me to hand deliver it that night. To keep it short, that nite I gave her more than my job resume!!! Now, David, the previous situation is very unusual for me, as I rarely have much to say, period. I've always been very shy and very quiet but am starting to come out of that. I'm not scared to approach women or anything but I just don't know how to start or keep conversation, you know? I've read books on this, listened to tapes and nothing seems to help. Dave, I need some advice!!! DK Indiana >>>MY COMMENTS: Oh, nice one! Great example of how to use Cocky & Funny with a woman! And as for meeting women, stop worrying about STARTING OR KEEPING CONVERSATIONS GOING. Just walk up to women, get their phone numbers, and then get together with them later for a cup of tea. No "starting of conversations" required. Use my 3 minute email/number technique, and then break out your killer sense of humor later when you're alone with her. You're doing fine... don't worry about "conversations". And if you do wind up in a conversation, just start out by talking about normal things, then transition into the Cocky & Funny material as you progress. ***QUESTION*** Hi Dave, I have been receiving your emails for a while now and boy have they been working. As a matter of fact, I was actually using the C/F all the time, without even realizing it. For example, In one of my classes there is this girl that acts weird most of the time (she's a solid 9.5) and one day she was talking to me, and I just turned around and said to my friend: "Did you say mental hospital?" I got a shot in the arm for that one. I kept unknowingly using C/F on her for maybe three days and then after one C/F comment she replied (with her hand on my shoulder): "I like you, you make me laugh" then she winked and turned around. I was shocked! I mean, I had basically been making fun of her. Little did I know that I had been doing everything right (this was before I started getting your emails). So anyway, my question. I have no problems meeting women in malls, on campus etc, but what about online? Are there any C/F comments I can use to start a conversation? The only ones I can think of are when they have ridiculous/absurd chat names. Thanks A >>>MY COMMENTS: Well, one of the GREAT things about teasing women is that you can basically GUESS things about them and they'll respond. For instance, if you're talking to a woman online, and you haven't seen her picture, you can say: "OK, you're probably some hairy, manly, seven hundred pound beast... and that's why you haven't sent me your picture..." (Use this kind of thing when she says that she's a model or dancer, etc. and it's obviously not even close.) The bolder you are, and the funnier, the better you'll do when guessing. Try it, you'll like it. ***QUESTION*** Dave- Whussup Man? Well I'm not gonna waste your time or mine tellin you about how great your teaching and knowledge is, because we both already know what's up! I'm a 19 yr old who has downloaded your ebook and I've read about the last 20+ emails.. I'm learning a lot. But I'm not where I want to be yet. Well here is what happened. I had lady friend of mine over to the house the other night. Now we have been friends for a little while now and I have to tried in the past to pursue this woman but like a lot of males in the world.. I would always turn wussy on her. This women is about 5' nothin', with a beautiful mind and a beautiful body, (she is a 8 or 9 on my scale, and I'm picky.)*the radio is ON* We haven't talked in a while so we caught up on each others lives..had some laughs with the cocky/funny attitude and I even fixed dinner! Well I told her before I made dinner that when we finished eating she owed me a 30 min. massage. She said okay. Now, we get done eating and she tells me to dim the lights and lay down. She tells me she is goin' to wash her hands and never comes back.. SHE LEFT!!!!!!! WHAT HAPPENED?!?! JF from Texas >>>MY COMMENTS: What happened? You went and spanked your chicken with reckless abandon? You cried yourself to sleep? lol... it's probably horrible that I'm laughing at your misery, but hey, these things happen. Don't worry about it, man. Next time, try making something other than "Hamburger Helper" with rainbow popsicles for dessert. I think you're gonna live. The problem is that you acted like a WUSSY for so long, that the thought of you being anything more than a friend made her RUN all the way home. You created your own problem, by trying to make a girl who was convinced that you were a Wuss into something more than a friend. It's not easy. ***COMMENT*** Today I met an ex-girlfriend (and now good friend and occasional date) for lunch at an Indian buffet. This is a woman who has commented in the past that she didn't like my cocky side (either I wasn't doing it right, or she was lying), so I was looking for a good opportunity to segue into a C&F routine and see how it affected her. At one point she complained that the bread was cold, and that I should go get some fresh stuff... ME: What's in it for me? [unoriginal line] HER: I'll stay and finish lunch at your table. Otherwise, I'll go get the bread and sit over there by myself. [great answer!] ME: Well, that'd be embarrassing. HER: Yup. ME: Everyone in the restaurant would think that you had to move because you've got real bad gas. And it went from there. You could see her eyes getting brighter throughout the conversation, and it ended with: HER: Wow, you're feisty today... ME: Yeah, so...? HER: So, it's really... attractive. ME [laughing]: Boy, you're easy today... That's a confession straight from the source: feisty = attractive. And she went on to demonstrate her attraction after lunch in an unusually aggressive manner. I think everything you're saying is capital-T Truth, brother. You know, people assume that Kissinger was talking about political power being the ultimate aphrodisiac, but I think there are many nuances to the word "power", and you don't have to be a senator or CEO to exploit it. Interesting aside: I was discussing this with an insightful female friend, and she agreed with everything you say, and added that women don't want to be our mothers... and if we treat them like we treat our mothers (i.e., act like a wuss), what does that say? C.K. >>>MY COMMENTS: Amen, brother. Amen. Feisty, Sassy, Cheeky, Ballsy... = ATTRACTION. ***QUESTION*** hey dave-lets get to the chase. 2 things (first the success story).. i met this chik who was getting off work..yelled out "HEY!" and she came over to me.. i started talking about anything and everything to get/keep her attention..busting on her and all ..she gave me her # after 20 minutes.. BUt i didnt call. then i ran into her again in the neighborhood but this time i did the same thing "whats your # again?" and then finally i wrote it down and scored on the second meeting after coffee.. the stuff works bro now for the wuss part..i meet this chik last summer who was in town for her job assignment that lasted for 1 month. Shes a real player. We met again after the party (she called me and said hey im coming over) and within 30 minutes she was in my bed in her bra/panties BUT i didnt do anything cause she was complaining about how guys are such dogs. so i didnt do anything for the next 5 meetings. She said "Im glad you never did anything cause we still wouldnt be talking if u did". Anyway, last time we meet she invites me AND 4 other guys for dinner. she sits on their laps (just like she did with me) to make me jealous. we have kept in touch for 5 months and next month she'll be back for a 2 week visit. i have heard shes talking to 5 other guys in town besides me. whenever i confront her on the phone about these guys she says "nooo! im not! and ive never slept with any of them so ignore the rumors! who do you believe them or me??!" she called me 1 month ago and let my phone ring once, and then when i called her back it was a guys voice (she moved in with her "friend" from high school) my question is: i told her how i felt about her and she already said she just wants to be friends because she travels around a lot. she'll be staying with 1 or 2 of these guys shes talking to when she comes back and will try to make me sooo jealous i know it. she called me last week and actually asked me for one of these guys numbers. I got angry and hung up on her (something i would never have done before) and then she called me back and actually seems a lot more interested. Then i called her yesterday from work and told her that a stripper approached me at a bar and asked me out and then this girl said "ohh well why dont you go out with her then?" but then said "OH by the way Im coming back on APRIL 21st".. i want to beat her at her own damn game! but i already gave her so much power. i wish i could just take it all back and make her feel the same way. HOW DO I HANDLE THIS GIRL:??? SHES DRIVING ME NUTS!!! CJ Houston,TX >>>MY COMMENTS: Wow, this is actually a very powerful story. First, she intimidated you by telling you that "guys are dogs"... which caused you to not try to take things to a physical level. When you did that, YOU FAILED THE FIRST TEST. She intimidated you with her words! Then, the more you pursued her without progressing, the more she tested you. Until she finally started INSULTING you... right in front of a bunch of other guys! By the way, when you mentioned that after you hung up on her she seemed a lot more interested... it's probably true. Look, man.... BAIL! Drop it. Hit the road. You screwed up in the beginning by handing over control of the relationship to her, and it's not worth the trouble or hassle to try to take it back. She's probably the type of girl that LOVES to play guys and make them chase her... and who enjoys seeing how much a guy will do to get her... only to leave after he does all he can. Move on. But remember the lesson. Steer clear of women like this in the future. Note: If you've read this story, and you can IDENTIFY with this guy who wrote it... and you know what it feels like to want a woman, but be completely OUT OF CONTROL of the situation... then I recommend that you work on your INNER GAME as much as possible. Self Image and Self Esteem are keys in this area, as they help you pass these "tests" that women throw at you... and they help you raise your standards, and avoid unhealthy women. If what I'm saying is making sense to you, then you should go RIGHT NOW and check out my DEEP INNER GAME DVD/CD program. This program will help you out in this area more than any other program ANYWHERE: http://www.DoubleYourDatingMethod.com/e/10280/DeepInnerGame/ ***SUCCESS STORY*** Dave For the past 6 weeks I've been hearing... "You scare me" (said jokingly) "I never know if you're being serious" "You know what I love about you? You make me laugh..." ... and its all down to you. Dave, you are "da man", so I just wanted to say a huge thank you and tell you what happened - all thanks to your newsletters and amazing book I got in touch with D via a personals web site, we started emailing, and I started the C&F. The first date was amazing. We went out to lunch - I never laid off the C&F and she was lapping it up. We went back to her place and started getting "cosy" (with the comments "I don't normally do this on a first date"). I had to leave for another engagement but she desperately wanted me to stay!! So I went back on the Sunday and we've been together ever since. Dave, you have saved another lost soul. Once again, a huge thank you. R England >>>MY COMMENTS: Hey, you're welcome. Cash donations are welcome, along with large gifts and other favors (no, I don't want a kiss). Just make sure you keep doing what worked to begin with, and don't turn into a WUSSY! ***QUESTION*** David, First, I LOVE your Advanced Dating Techniques CD program. Everyone; do yourself a favor, BUY David's stuff! It's EXCELLENT!!! Well worth the INVESTMENT in YOURSELF!!! This past Thursday, I was on a second date with this attractive female. Been using the c&f on both dates and she eating eating it up. Anyway, we end up back at her place. First, we get there and I sit back on the couch. She asks if I want a drink, so I tell her NO. Suggesting that she is just trying to get me drunk. We watch tv for a little bit; then when I was thirsty, I got up and asked her if she wanted a drink.She said no, so when I went to her fridge and I asked her what do you want me to bring you back, because I'm not drinking alone. After we both finish our first drink, I lean over and pecked her on the lips. She tried to kiss me back and I told her to settle down and go get us another drink, which she did. ....Fast forward, after a night of everything, but sex (I didn't have a condom), as I was kissing her good night (she wanted me to stay, but I was leaving for a trip Friday morning, so I told her No.) she said, "I'm going to regret not sleeping with you in the morning." I smile and kiss her. She said, "Maybe next time." I said, "Maybe." Then she said, "or the time after that." That light bulb my David D. light bulb went on, this preparedst. Being prepaid I said, "What makes you think I'll want to have sex with you next time? Or the time after that?" She said, "You're a guy and that's what all guys want." I said, "Maybe I'll only kiss you next time." She said, "I hope we'd AT LEAST do that." Driving the nail home that I was in control and she wasn't going to use sex as a weapon, I said, "Fine, then hand holding it is." She said, "Hand holding?" hand-holding, "Yes, you've been promoted to handholding." She said, "How is that a promotion?" I kissed her and said, "I'll tell you next time." and left. Needless to say, next time I'll score, if I want to. LOL!!! Of course I will, because that's what all guys want. hehehehe!!! This stuff is GREAT! I haven't finished cd 10 or 11 yet, but I do have a question about paying? When is it appropriate to let her pay? How often? How do I let her pay without being perceived as a wussy? Thanks again. You have changed my life for the better. I now get it. Plus, it's fun to watch the guys who Chicago-land This stuff is VERY POWERFUL, use it with caution. J Chicagoland >>>MY COMMENTS: Very nice. Mixed messages, teasing, stepping back, making her feel anticipation and want it badly... GREAT. This is a great example of how to handle a situation like this one. As far as letting women pay... The whole topic of "paying" is kind of a pain. It has gotten into many women's heads that if a guy pays it means that he's a "gentleman" and if he doesn't it means that "he's not". ***SUCCESS STORY*** Howdy, Dave -- I wrote to you about a year ago with what I thought was a great "Success Story" involving a biker chick. She was just so hot, and she came on to me right in front of her biker boyfriend, after I busted on her about how I thought only good-looking women got to ride on Harleys. Well, she turned out to be one sick puppy. Chock full of really strange mental and personality things. Well, I kept being C&F with other women while I was dating this chick -- and I'm sure glad I said, "No" when she wanted to move in with me! Anyhow, to make a long story a bit shorter, I'm now involved with a 50 year-old 10. Perhaps a 10.5!! I'm 55, average looking, divorced x2, definitely not wealthy, etc, etc. I treated this woman as if she was my "bratty little sister" and after a couple months of banter, she asked me for a date! I had not even bought her a cuppa! Anyhow, we have been dating since last summer, and back around Christmastime, I started getting wussyfied with her. I saw immediately that it was not the right thing to do. She began to withdraw, so I did not call her or see her for a week. It was tough to pull back and get back to doing the right things. (No, I didn't have dreams of you bitch-slapping me! I got that vicariously in your emails!!) My point is this -- if it works, keep doing it!! Don't stop. And, as soon as you realize you've reverted, AS SOON AS, get back to right behavior. This woman loves me even more now because I was able to backpedal quickly. Pay attention to yourself and what you are doing and saying, guys! Don't ever go back to wussiness. Wussy only works with your mom, and you don't want to date her, do you? Pay attention to yourself and what you are doing and saying! Be in control of your life. Thanks, Mr. Dave. G from Colorado >>>MY COMMENTS: Exactly... do what works, and if you start slipping, pull back and then get back with the program. Good job, and keep it up. Thanks for the email. ***QUESTION*** Here's a Q for you...I haven't ordered you CD's yet, I've been reading your emails and taking in the info slowly, but I'll definitely do so soon. On the issue of being generous....It has always in my nature to be generous of myself unconditionally with most people I like, but I don't give away my life just for attention or to "buy" people's friendship, and certainly for a woman's attention, I have always known that just doesn't work. I come from a family in which it is natural for us to be generous as a matter of good form, but never beyond the means available. It's a cultural trait I guess. Being tight and always expecting a reward for everything is neurotic anyways. Problem is between women and I is that I have no problem with doing a small favor for a woman just out of what I feel is just decency. But I don't expect to immediately jump in the sack with her. It's a paradox for me. Like going to a club and buying some woman a drink, but not expecting anything in return except having a good time and just getting along. Maybe it's a good way to sort out the user/flaky types from the cool and normal types, doing a small favor and seeing how they react. I've had good results from controlling how much I will give, and sometimes throwing in some humor like this "O.K. one drink(sly grin here)but if you start stumbling around I'm not paying your cabfare home!", This always gets a laugh and loosens up the woman, and keeps me in control(I think) without seeming that I'm a sucker or trying to buy her attention. What is your view on this kind of thing? Oh, another thing I'll do is _not_ get clingy if I do something like that..in fact I've found that if I just walk away and find something to do for a few minutes( talk to a friend or even go to the bathroom or whatever that) right after doing a small favor, and allowing some "breathing space", that the next time around they get at ease and usually a good conversation usual starts leading to and exchange of digits. Do you think I'm on the right track? or os it too "friendly"(read doomed wuss)? Thanks C.M. >>>MY COMMENTS: This is a great question. I think that most of us REALLY want to be "good" to women... we want to do nice things, treat women well, and "take care" of them. I can understand your generosity mindset, and I actually admire you for having an "abundance" mentality. But I'm going to present you with another way of looking at things... one that might really help you. What if you thought of "generosity" a little differently? What if you were to realize that being "generous" with a woman sometimes means to ACT like you're being NOT generous at all? What if you were to see that if you were too "generous" at first, that a woman would SUSPECT that you were only being generous to MANIPULATE her? It's not you. It's that women are so used to men trying to do things for them in order to get attention and sex in return that they: 1) See this kind of generosity as "average" and expected behavior... and immediately slot you into the "regular, nice guy" category when you do it. 2) Often see generosity as a form of manipulation, whereby a man uses gifts and dinners to set up a situation where the women feels that she needs to "put out" in return. Lean back. Be generous LATER, when it will be perceived to be more authentic and special. It sounds to me like you're a genuinely good guy. The challenge is getting a woman's attention for long enough that you can actually SHOW her this side of you, and have it not come across as "ass kissing" behavior. ***SUCCESS STORY*** Hey Dave, First, let me say how powerful your techniques are. A lot of the methods you teach have been part of my success in the past; I just didn't realize it until I started using your various Double Your Dating materials! I'm from Manhattan, New York; and I work in probably one of the best places in the world to find unbelievably beautiful women; the "fashion district." In this part of NYC, their are hordes of models going from fittings to fittings, to photo shoots etc. Here is a real-world example of your excellent teachings in action! #1, when I go out to lunch; I don't go to a fast food joint, I go to a salad bar (these are very popular in this part of town). The theory being that, I desire a girl with a great figure, and fast food is not the path to one, so I hit the salad spots! Recently, I see this very well known model (who happens to have a major modeling contract with a cosmetics company) at my favorite lunch spot, waiting on line to pay for her salad. She is of course an absolute 10, wearing a super sexy outfit complete with some killer stiletto style heels; so I see my 'in.' I walk up behind her and say "what is up with those shoes," in *almost* a disapproving way. She gives a half glance towards me and says in a slightly confused, self conches way "what, their Jimmie Choo's." Still looking down, I respond "their sharp." She responds "thanks." At this point, I'm still just not much more than another guy looking to get her attention, in her eyes. So I respond "that wasn't a complement, I'm saying that they're SHARP; like they could be used as a weapon!" She responds with a big smile. At this point, the woman at the register says "next! [we both walk to the register] Are you together" I quickly respond "no- way did you see those weapons she calls shoes?" this don't even make complete sense, but that's the point! I make sure I pay first (cutting ahead of her), then as she starts to pay for her order, I say "I'll tell you what, if you promise to keep your shoes on the floor, I'll LET you have lunch with me today." After that c&f comment she had this really confused look on her face like, who the hell is this guy to talk to me like this? Notice DYD-ers, I didn't even act like I knew who she was. As a matter of fact, to this day I never play into her fame/success AT ALL! To keep a long story from getting any longer, I got her email that day at lunch, and now we have been dating for three months! I cannot thank you enough Dave, for showing me the errors of my ways, and helping me date so many beautiful girls. G from Manhattan >>>MY COMMENTS: Ah, models. The object of desire for so many men. And what do most guys do when they run into a woman who is of "model quality"? They get nervous, act stupid, and say things that sound exactly like the other 47 guys that she has talked to that day... Beautiful women are some of the VERY BEST people to bust on. Think of it this way: Her beauty (and in your case, fame) is her weapon. It's where her power comes from. When you approach a woman like this and immediately acknowledge her beauty, you also say, "I see that you are powerful, and I'm one of those who your power affects". On the other hand, when you totally disregard her "outward beauty" and instead start making fun of her, teasing, and enjoying yourself, you instead say, "I am the powerful one, and your beauty magic doesn't work on me". This has an INSTANT effect. It separates you from 999 out of 1,000 other men that she meets. And if you're CHARMING and FUNNY as well, it just says all the right things. Great job, and congratulations on finding a beautiful woman who you enjoy enough to date on an ongoing basis. ...and if you're reading this Mailbag right now, and thinking to yourself, "Man, I need to start learning this stuff and get this part of my life handled..." ...then YOU'RE RIGHT. There's no better time than the present. Here's an interesting thought... At one of my live seminars, I met a guy who owns my Advanced Dating Techniques program. Get this: He told me that he has listened to the CD version of the program 13 times now. 13 times! Why do you think he's listened to it so many times? Because he still learns NEW stuff EVERY time he listens to it. So what am I trying to say here? I'm trying to say that it's JAM PACKED with incredible information. My Advanced Series was actually recorded at a special 3 day seminar I did. It was then edited down to a tight presentation (over 12 full hours), and released on CD and DVD. It's me teaching all of my very best stuff. I don't hold anything back, and I have the time to explain all of my concepts in detail... with examples and step-by-step techniques for each of them. This is the best program you'll find on meeting more women and getting more dates, and I highly recommend that you check it out. It's here: http://www.DoubleYourDatingMethod.com/e/10...AdvancedSeries/ ...and it's also important that you read my eBook "Double Your Dating". It's the foundation for all of the things I teach in these newsletters, and all the things I teach in my Advanced Dating Techniques program. You can download it here and be reading it in just a few minutes: http://www.DoubleYourDatingMethod.com/e/10280/eBook/ I'll talk to you again soon. Your Friend, David D. Edited April 19, 2006 by softwareNerd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liriodendron Tulipifera Posted April 19, 2006 Report Share Posted April 19, 2006 (edited) In another thread that I'm too lazy too try to link too, I started a "discussion" about better ways to create attraction in the fairer sex then the customary flowers and card BS. A LOT of what I said was misiterpreted, I believe. Not at all, I think agree with you totally. Crass jokes are perfect if your primary goal is to get a woman laid right off the bat. Here are some other good ones from your other post, which I quote: "The "jerks" use this stuff because they really DON'T care about her. They just care about hittin' it." "Bust a hotties balls, if she's a little vertically challenged, walk right up and say, "What's up, shortie?" or "I like my women short... that way they don't have to get on their knees when....... sarcastic smile."" Edited April 19, 2006 by Liriodendron Tulipifera Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EC Posted April 19, 2006 Report Share Posted April 19, 2006 (edited) Wow, isn't obvious that she ^^^ wants me. Edited April 19, 2006 by EC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
softwareNerd Posted April 19, 2006 Report Share Posted April 19, 2006 EC, While you're on a roll, you should create a parallel thread about creating attadction in males and have that critiqued too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EC Posted April 19, 2006 Report Share Posted April 19, 2006 Good idea! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EC Posted April 19, 2006 Report Share Posted April 19, 2006 (edited) On second thought that thread would be too short anyway. It would consist of .... (first) beautiful, (second) be intellgient w/quick witted personality, (third) don't be a bia.......... Men don't usually play the games MOST women do. We get right to the point. Edited April 19, 2006 by EC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liriodendron Tulipifera Posted April 19, 2006 Report Share Posted April 19, 2006 (edited) Wow, isn't obvious that she ^^^ wants me. Isn't it predictable that you would respond with such a comment? Edited April 19, 2006 by Liriodendron Tulipifera Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EC Posted April 19, 2006 Report Share Posted April 19, 2006 A bit too..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
konerko14 Posted August 10, 2006 Report Share Posted August 10, 2006 Why is it bad to have sex with someone you are attracted to but dont love? Heres a concrete example: A man and woman meet at a bar. That night they go back to one of their places and have sex, even though they just met that night. What are the negative consequences of these actions? How will this affect them negatively after they have sex? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.