Meta Blog Posted January 24, 2006 Report Share Posted January 24, 2006 Originally from Myrhaf, Cindy Sheehan has authored a statement of her ideology, called Matriotism. If I tried to explain it, you would think I was unfairly satirizing her position. You have to read it to believe it. Sheehan doesn’t think much of patriotism. …patriotism in the US means: exploiting others' love for country by sending them and their children off to sacrifice for my bank balance! Why Matriotism? Not everyone is a mother, but there is one universal truth that no one can dispute no matter how hard they try (and believe me, some will try): Everyone has a mother! Mothers give life, and if the child is lucky, mothers nurture life. And if a man has had a nurturing mother he will already have a base of Matriotism. Of course, everyone has a father too, but… never mind. Sheehan observes that we were on the path to Matriotism after 9/11, but something horrible happened. After the tragedy of 9/11 we were on our way to becoming a fledgling Matriotic society until our leaders jumped on the bandwagon of inappropriate and misguided vengeance to send our young people to die and kill in two countries that were no threat to the USA or to our way of life. The neocons exploited patriotism to fulfill their goals of imperialism and plumder. The important thing to remember here is that this new age drivel is not coming from some obscure crackpot, but from a crackpot who is a hero to the liberal-left. Last August the media kept busy during its slowest month (called by some the “silly season”) by shining its spotlights on Cindy Sheehan. She and people like her have a real influence on the Democrat Party, which is still one of the two major political parties in America. These people are forcing the party to the left, or at least forcing it to stop its centrist pretense. I have to think that the wiser hands in the MSM will soon realize, if they have not already, that giving this woman publicity hurts the Democrat Party. (HT: Little Green Footballs) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FeatherFall Posted January 25, 2006 Report Share Posted January 25, 2006 (edited) I have trouble understanding how Hugo Chavez fits into matriotism. -edited to add link Edited January 25, 2006 by FeatherFall Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inspector Posted January 25, 2006 Report Share Posted January 25, 2006 (edited) I'm not sure of the exact congruence here, but I recall Ayn Rand's opinion of the "matriarch:" the most unfeminine, sexless, metaphysically inappropriate and rationally revolting figure of all: a matriarch. Edited January 25, 2006 by Inspector Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capitalism Forever Posted January 25, 2006 Report Share Posted January 25, 2006 I'm not sure of the exact congruence here, but I recall Ayn Rand's opinion of the "matriarch:" I believe it's a very pertinent quote. The matria, or mother country, is of course exactly the same thing as the patria (father country), but what Sheehan actually has in mind is a feministically inspired anti-patriotism. One more example of trying to subvert a value under its very banner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inspector Posted January 25, 2006 Report Share Posted January 25, 2006 Curse the Left's penchant for Orwellian neologism. Curse it! (not that Orwell invented leftist fact-inversion neologisms, just that he identified them) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.