dianahsieh Posted November 20, 2006 Report Share Posted November 20, 2006 By Paul from NoodleFood,cross-posted by MetaBlog Today's story of epistemology in action concerns a lawsuit over the proper definition of a "sandwich". In this case, a judge ruled that a burrito was not a sandwich: Is a burrito a sandwich? The Panera Bread Co. bakery-and-cafe chain says yes. But a judge said no, ruling against Panera in its bid to prevent a Mexican restaurant from moving into the same shopping mall. Panera has a clause in its lease that prevents the White City Shopping Center in Shrewsbury from renting to another sandwich shop. Panera tried to invoke that clause to stop the opening of an Qdoba Mexican Grill. But Superior Court Judge Jeffrey Locke cited Webster's Dictionary as well as testimony from a chef and a former high-ranking federal agriculture official in ruling that Qdoba's burritos and other offerings are not sandwiches. The difference, the judge ruled, comes down to two slices of bread versus one tortilla. "A sandwich is not commonly understood to include burritos, tacos and quesadillas, which are typically made with a single tortilla and stuffed with a choice filling of meat, rice, and beans," Locke wrote in a decision released last week. In court papers, Panera, a St. Louis-based chain of more than 900 cafes, argued for a broad definition of a sandwich, saying that a flour tortilla is bread and that a food product with bread and a filling is a sandwich. http://ObjectivismOnline.com/blog/archives/002107.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vladimir Berkov Posted November 20, 2006 Report Share Posted November 20, 2006 If sandwich = bread + filling then a lot of really WIERD things can be called a sandwich. Perhaps moo shu pork? Hot dogs? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bold Standard Posted November 20, 2006 Report Share Posted November 20, 2006 The difference, the judge ruled, comes down to two slices of bread versus one tortilla. http://ObjectivismOnline.com/blog/archives/002107.html Isn't there such a thing as an open-faced sandwich that has only one slice of bread? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DavidOdden Posted November 20, 2006 Report Share Posted November 20, 2006 Isn't there such a thing as an open-faced sandwich that has only one slice of bread?Yeah, but I think they only eat those up here. It's nice to have a judge with a lick of common sense. Anybody got a citation on the case? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Groovenstein Posted November 20, 2006 Report Share Posted November 20, 2006 In first year contracts, it's standard for people to cover the famous chicken case, a fun read: http://www.law.seattleu.edu/fachome/rideou...mentopinion.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.