konerko14 Posted December 8, 2006 Report Share Posted December 8, 2006 What will a country gain for itself when(if) water is discovered on Mars? NASA says it is a huge discovery because that could mean life might be present or have existed in the past. But what importance is that to us if single-celled organisms are roaming Mars? Is it worth the substantial amount of money they spent on these missions even if they do find water? And if they are having this much trouble finding only a slight amount of water, does that not mean there is very very little on Mars- what good will that do for us if miniscule amounts are there? Im not for or against missions to Mars because I dont quite have enough knowledge on the subject to make a judgment call. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaszloWalrus Posted December 8, 2006 Report Share Posted December 8, 2006 I'm of course against publicly funded missions to Mars, but discovering life there could be of ENORMOUS help in understanding the origins of life. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DavidOdden Posted December 8, 2006 Report Share Posted December 8, 2006 But what importance is that to us if single-celled organisms are roaming Mars? Is it worth the substantial amount of money they spent on these missions even if they do find water?It is quite significant to me if there are single-celled organisms roaming Mars. Assuming that it's unimportant to you, then between the two of us that averages out to simply "important". Since you're obviously not asking whether taxation is moral, I'll leave that issue to the side. I might consider making a $100 donation to fund such an scientific exploration. However, I'd also want to get all of the requests for donations from other worthy projects. It might end up that something else would bump that project from my list, for example cloning, fusion or teleportation. If there were some really valuable thing on Mars that could be commercially exploited, maybe the research could be tacked on to a commercial venture, for relatively little money. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Wrath Posted December 8, 2006 Report Share Posted December 8, 2006 If our money has to be forcibly confiscated, I'd rather it go towards cool things like the space program than to welfare or universal health care. Let them eat cake. I'd rather have an American flag on the surface of Mars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
konerko14 Posted December 8, 2006 Author Report Share Posted December 8, 2006 It is quite significant to me if there are single-celled organisms roaming Mars. Why? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DavidOdden Posted December 8, 2006 Report Share Posted December 8, 2006 Why?Because of my general interest in understanding reality. Things such as "What makes life possible". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DavidV Posted December 8, 2006 Report Share Posted December 8, 2006 I understand that while Mars is probably lifeless, there is some earth bacteria capable of surviving under Martian conditions. Perhaps with some genetic engineering, we can get more complex lifeforms to survive there. That way, if we manage to exterminate life on earth, at least we'll have spread it elsewhere. I for one, welcome our single-celled Martian overlords. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
konerko14 Posted December 8, 2006 Author Report Share Posted December 8, 2006 Because of my general interest in understanding reality. Things such as "What makes life possible". Is that the main question that they want to answer with these missions, or are there other questions suspected to be answered with the finding of water on Mars? And why would this type of find give a good lead as to answering the "what makes life possible" question? -is it to be a comparison tool with Earth, finding similarities with each other? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dismuke Posted December 9, 2006 Report Share Posted December 9, 2006 (edited) What will a country gain for itself when(if) water is discovered on Mars? They will be able to bottle the stuff in trendy looking containers and sell it as something "natural" to a bunch of back-to-nature wannabes in places where lots of lefties congregate such as Whole Foods Market, Ben & Jerry's and Starbucks Edited December 9, 2006 by Dismuke Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
konerko14 Posted December 10, 2006 Author Report Share Posted December 10, 2006 Is that the main question that they want to answer with these missions, or are there other questions suspected to be answered with the finding of water on Mars? And why would this type of find give a good lead as to answering the "what makes life possible" question? -is it to be a comparison tool with Earth, finding similarities with each other? Can anybody answer this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingofthething Posted December 16, 2006 Report Share Posted December 16, 2006 Woah woah woah...there's a Whole Foods in Texas? I thought there was only one and it was just in Baltimore. Is it a chain? That would be hilarious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dismuke Posted December 16, 2006 Report Share Posted December 16, 2006 Woah woah woah...there's a Whole Foods in Texas? I thought there was only one and it was just in Baltimore. Is it a chain? That would be hilarious. Not only are there Whole Food Markets in Texas, the chain actually got its start in Austin, Texas. In fact, last year they built a brand new headquarters and flagship store in Austin. See: http://www.wholefoodsmarket.com/company/pr_02-22-05.html I have been in it - it is pretty nice. However, I much prefer another Texas chain called Central Market which overlaps slightly with Whole Foods except that Central Market focuses more on gourmet and specialty foods wheras Whole Foods focuses on "natural" foods and goes after the hippie market more. Central Market also started out in Austin but now has locations in the other major Texas metro areas. Their stores are actually tourist attractions with their Austin stores being the city's number 2 tourist draw after the state capital. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-archimedes- Posted December 17, 2006 Report Share Posted December 17, 2006 (edited) If I may beg to differ with the opinions/perspectives forwarded here so far in order to clarify a few misconceptions/understandings/deliberate media misdirection, of the factual content of the information found to date about "Mars" &/or "life" thereon. As I understand it, while it's been determined that there is evidence on the surface of the planet that there may once have been liquid/"water" there, I also understand that it's pretty much common knowledge that Mars' atmosphere is made solely up of "CO2"/H2CO3, a carbonic chemical more so commonly known as "carbon monoxide", a gas which can be reduced to either solid, or liquid form, i.e., "water", by the application of "intense presure". http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2003/07aug_southpole.htm Also, what "life" that there has been determined to be on/from Mars has actually been "microbial" in nature, as was discovered in a meteorite recovered from Antarctica in 1984 (1 of some 12 found here) believed to have originated on Mars, and all of the indications for the potential of "life" could just as well be nothing more than perhaps some slightly modified (given the intense pressure and chemical composition of the Mars' atmosphere) "dust grains" that just so happen to be typical to all meteorites discovered so far. http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/marslife.html But it is both nice and beneficial to dream and imagine the unknown. p.s. If the second link I've given you directs you to a multi-selection page, you'll want the first listed link there that'll exactly match the address as posted. Edited December 17, 2006 by -archimedes- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DavidOdden Posted December 17, 2006 Report Share Posted December 17, 2006 I'm curious "why" you use scare quotes the way "you" do. Do you know "what" their function in writing "is"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dismuke Posted December 17, 2006 Report Share Posted December 17, 2006 as was discovered in a meteorite recovered from Antarctica in 1984 (1 of some 12 found here) believed to have originated on Mars, Here is what I have always been curious about when I have heard of such meteorites: 1 - On what basis do they have to believe such a meteorite came from Mars specifically as opposed to anyplace else? 2) - Assuming it did, in fact come from Mars, how on Earth........ errrrr.....I mean how on Mars......did it get away from Mars. Presumably escaping the gravitational field of a planet is a pretty difficult task. Do other planets end up getting meteorites from Earth - actual natural chunks of Earth as opposed to our assortment of man-made space debris some of which might perhaps eventually find its way to other planets? I can't imagine a volcanic eruption being powerful enough to toss large chunks so high that they end up going into outer space. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkWaters Posted December 17, 2006 Report Share Posted December 17, 2006 (edited) I'm curious "why" you use scare quotes the way "you" do. Do you know "what" their function in writing "is"? I had a friend from Turkey who insisted that using quotes conveyed emphasis. I warned him to stop doing this so liberally on his application essays, as it made him look really foolish. Unfortunately for him, he remained intransigent on this matter. Edited December 17, 2006 by DarkWaters Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkWaters Posted December 17, 2006 Report Share Posted December 17, 2006 Im not for or against missions to Mars because I dont quite have enough knowledge on the subject to make a judgment call. Hey Konerko, If you are interested in pursuing this topic more, I recommend reading The Case for Mars by Dr. Robert Zubrin. He is also an outspoken advocate for the privatization of space exploration so this makes especially interesting reading. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-archimedes- Posted December 17, 2006 Report Share Posted December 17, 2006 I'm curious "why" you use scare quotes the way "you" do. Do you know "what" their function in writing "is"? "Scare quotes" ?? If you're referring to my use of quotation marks to encase certain words or sentences, I do so as I'm actually quoting the words or sentences from the links I've posted, in a sense providing the viewer with excerpts of what they are to expect to find when they click on the links, a preview of things to come if you will, in a sense, pre-validating whatever assertions/claims/perspectives that I may be forwarding here on the cover page. In otherwords, I make use of quotation marks as "quotation marks", what I believe their "function in writing is." Please though, do correct me if I am wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'kian Posted December 17, 2006 Report Share Posted December 17, 2006 1 - On what basis do they have to believe such a meteorite came from Mars specifically as opposed to anyplace else? Presumably by its composition. 2) - Assuming it did, in fact come from Mars, how on Earth........ errrrr.....I mean how on Mars......did it get away from Mars. Presumably escaping the gravitational field of a planet is a pretty difficult task. Most likely, as as result of a large meteor strike on Mars. Such impacts pack a lot of kinetic energy, which would eject small chunks of rock off the planet and into interplanetary space. Eventually a few of these would reach Earth. Take a look at Mars and remind yourself those are meteoric craters on its surface. Do other planets end up getting meteorites from Earth - actual natural chunks of Earth as opposed to our assortment of man-made space debris some of which might perhaps eventually find its way to other planets? It's very likely. of course, Mars has a thinner atmosphere, which creates less air resistance, and a lower gravity, which allows escape at lower speeds. Earth's thicker atmosphere also slows down meteors. So Earth meteorite would be less common than Martian ones. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-archimedes- Posted December 17, 2006 Report Share Posted December 17, 2006 Here is what I have always been curious about when I have heard of such meteorites: 1 - On what basis do they have to believe such a meteorite came from Mars specifically as opposed to anyplace else? 2) - Assuming it did, in fact come from Mars, how on Earth........ errrrr.....I mean how on Mars......did it get away from Mars. Presumably escaping the gravitational field of a planet is a pretty difficult task. Do other planets end up getting meteorites from Earth - actual natural chunks of Earth as opposed to our assortment of man-made space debris some of which might perhaps eventually find its way to other planets? I can't imagine a volcanic eruption being powerful enough to toss large chunks so high that they end up going into outer space. The second link that I've provided in my initial post goes into some detail as to the commonly accepted perception of just how Mars' fragments may have not only formed, but also found their way to Earth/answers all of your questions..., please click and read. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-archimedes- Posted December 17, 2006 Report Share Posted December 17, 2006 I had a friend from Turkey who insisted that using quotes conveyed emphasis. I warned him to stop doing this so liberally on his application essays, as it made him look really foolish. Unfortunately for him, he remained intransigent on this matter. Unlike your friend, I employ quotation marks for their intended purpose, i.e., to quote a word, sentence/some excerpt from either a link I've posted, or something that I read/heard elsewhere..., I use itallics to lend emphasis, a practice which I'm given to believe is their ("itallics") intended purpose. And I assure you, I am quite adamant about this method of locutionary expression. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-archimedes- Posted December 17, 2006 Report Share Posted December 17, 2006 Because of my general interest in understanding reality. Things such as "What makes life possible". Could you elaborate on the intent of your question, please? That is, are you inquiring "what makes life possible"...to us, as humans, or are you inquiring as to "what makes life possible", relatively speaking ? I ask for this clarification to point out an often overlooked aspect of our world around us/the imposition of our will on it as it relates to us, instead of as we relate to it, as is the proper reference, which all ties into man's perception of what quantifies intelligence. So please elaborate a bit, oh, and good question. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DavidOdden Posted December 17, 2006 Report Share Posted December 17, 2006 In otherwords, I make use of quotation marks as "quotation marks", what I believe their "function in writing is." Please though, do correct me if I am wrong.When they are put around a passage of more than a word or two (and when there is a proper citation), it signals verbatim quotation. Otherwise it signals mockery. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkWaters Posted December 18, 2006 Report Share Posted December 18, 2006 Unlike your friend, I employ quotation marks for their intended purpose, i.e., to quote a word, sentence/some excerpt from either a link I've posted, or something that I read/heard elsewhere..., I use itallics to lend emphasis, a practice which I'm given to believe is their ("itallics") intended purpose. Rest assured I did not mention the tidbit to derogate you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DavidOdden Posted December 18, 2006 Report Share Posted December 18, 2006 Could you elaborate on the intent of your question, please? That is, are you inquiring "what makes life possible"...to us, as humans, or are you inquiring as to "what makes life possible", relatively speaking ?I'm interested in the nature of life, in general. For example, is life possible based on silicon compounds rather than carbon; what are the means of encoding the properties of a life-form (we have DNA, but maybe other molecular structures serve the same function)? The root questions are "what is life?" and "what causes life?"; I don't know whether a particular answer would have a profound impact on my philosophy of man. I have an idea about what makes life possible for humans and various other forms of life on Earth (though at the Monica level I'm clueless, and always fascinated to learn about the bizarre 1 cell stuff that's out there). So I want to know if the concept "life", as we know it here on Earth, is the same as or different from that on other planets. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.