BinniLee Posted May 7, 2007 Report Share Posted May 7, 2007 *Does the Randoid* Harder, better, faster, stronger.... Well I've read the romantic manifesto and I agree with it. But since it was written have there been any further insights into Objectivist music theory? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exaltron Posted May 7, 2007 Report Share Posted May 7, 2007 *Does the Randoid* Harder, better, faster, stronger.... Well I've read the romantic manifesto and I agree with it. But since it was written have there been any further insights into Objectivist music theory? The Randroid, eh? I wasn't aware it was a dance. Sort of like the robot, but more heroic? And is that a quote from a Daft Punk song? I was sure I was the only one who appreciated that vocoder lyric on a spiritual level. There has been a LOT of discussion on this board towards a more detailed Objectivist music theory, though I haven't heard much from the "official" Objectivist institutions. One of my favorite (probably because I rap) is this discussion of whether rap music qualifies as music. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BinniLee Posted May 7, 2007 Author Report Share Posted May 7, 2007 Yeah, like the robot but more heroic, but I'm too white to dance. Thnaks for the link. Yeah daft punk... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuzal atla creala iuday Posted April 10, 2008 Report Share Posted April 10, 2008 I think the greatest anthem of self-respect out there right now is "Love Song" by Sara Bareilis. Not only is it amazing lyrically, it is also so profoundly different from most modern music melodically as well. If objectivism is to formulate a standard for music, it should start there. Also, I have some song lyrics that I think would also fit the standard. It was obviously written in reaction to outcries of multiculturalist-pacifism toward to the terrorists of the Middle East. Out in the desert with brute jelousy they stare at what we've done with our right to be free. Down with those structures should've crashed our divides but still hatred between us and towards us resides. I don't care what they say we should do when they slaughtered our brethren and they'll do it again and how can one say it's only our problem to rid when the very same people put a bomb in madrid. So remember, as we quarrell among ourselves they are stacking crude weapons upon storage shelves so please heed my warning, before this great nation falls please heed my warning, if you care about it at all. We're repeating roman history and most don't realize we might kill the last free-loving land before our own eyes. They dismantle us with caution so we'll let them remain in the hopes that we won't sustain. So remember, as we quarrell among ourselves they are stacking crude weapons upon storage shelves so please heed my warning, before this great nation falls please heed my warning, if you care about it at all. They don't believe in our system they believe we should die. Well I don't want to, again, see the great eagle cry. The minds of our fellow men believe it's not fair that we should be able to solve this without even a care. Well, that's just our problem our own just don't care they just think what they're told by the ones on the air. So remember, as we quarrell among ourselves they are stacking crude weapons upon storage shelves so please heed my warning, before this great nation falls please heed my warning, if you care about it at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gabo Posted April 11, 2008 Report Share Posted April 11, 2008 Excellent lyrics! You can check out my musical project "Think" which is on Youtube. The songs have lyrics in a similar vein: www.youtube.com/user/Gabobjectivist Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuzal atla creala iuday Posted April 11, 2008 Report Share Posted April 11, 2008 Excellent lyrics yourself, but I think that the melodies are too overly distorted in the music, as if there is none. It seems like the song is just trying to get the message out, like a lecture. Even Rand stated that "it must also be enjoyable just to experience" which, in my opinion, it is not. If you could get lyrics like that into a better melody, I would buy the album in an instant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exaltron Posted April 12, 2008 Report Share Posted April 12, 2008 Excellent lyrics yourself, but I think that the melodies are too overly distorted in the music, as if there is none. It seems like the song is just trying to get the message out, like a lecture. Even Rand stated that "it must also be enjoyable just to experience" which, in my opinion, it is not. If you could get lyrics like that into a better melody, I would buy the album in an instant. I agree with that aesthetic assessment, I think that is part of the reason I have moved towards more melodic vocals that are implicitly objectivist (ie, you have to listen and understand what philosophical principles are being referenced), as opposed to the explicitly objectivist hip-hop that I was doing prior to that. It was fun to cram all kinds of objectivist messages into clever rhymes, but there is nothing like creating something that expresses a love of life without having to put that message in the lyrics. Here is a good example of that, a song called "Oxygen" that I recently finished. I've been getting some great feedback on Myspace for this song, but only a few people who really seem to get it. On an interesting side note, the more I feel that I am able to integrate the melody, phrasing, etc. with the message in the lyrics, the less I want to post lyrics. I can't stand to see or present the words I wrote to be sung appear in print. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuzal atla creala iuday Posted April 12, 2008 Report Share Posted April 12, 2008 I agree with that aesthetic assessment, I think that is part of the reason I have moved towards more melodic vocals that are implicitly objectivist (ie, you have to listen and understand what philosophical principles are being referenced), as opposed to the explicitly objectivist hip-hop that I was doing prior to that. It was fun to cram all kinds of objectivist messages into clever rhymes, but there is nothing like creating something that expresses a love of life without having to put that message in the lyrics. Here is a good example of that, a song called "Oxygen" that I recently finished. I've been getting some great feedback on Myspace for this song, but only a few people who really seem to get it. On an interesting side note, the more I feel that I am able to integrate the melody, phrasing, etc. with the message in the lyrics, the less I want to post lyrics. I can't stand to see or present the words I wrote to be sung appear in print. I like this one better. The melody still seems to be too broken though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spaceplayer Posted January 8, 2009 Report Share Posted January 8, 2009 *Does the Randoid* Harder, better, faster, stronger.... Well I've read the romantic manifesto and I agree with it. But since it was written have there been any further insights into Objectivist music theory? "Objectivist" music theory? Well, Rand said herself that there was no such thing as Objectivist music...but, if you mean research into the questions she asked in "Art and Cognition," about how and why music does its thing... Roger Bissell has written a few things, notably "Art as Microcosm," and contested Rand and Helmholtz on the sensation of tone...the latter was online, but is temporarily unavailable, but his site is http://www.rogerbissell.com/. JARS published a symposium dedicated to Torres and Khamhi's WHAT ART IS: THE ESTHETIC THEORY OF AYN RAND, with different views, pro and con, of Rand's musical theory. Worth checking out... My own site, Orpheus Remembered, has some things of interest as well, mainly my essay on the cognitive and gestalt theory of music as they support Rand's theory. Hope that helps, Joe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Caya Posted January 9, 2009 Report Share Posted January 9, 2009 Progressive rock and metal have many bands that promote Objectivist themes, most notably Rush and Dream Theater. I always found Dream Theater's very first album amazing because of the lyrics and phrasin. That said, you can still tell the young musicians are still fleshing out their styles together as the composition can get muddy in places. Here are some samples: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jBvlz3Pl0-0 Other bands that express heroic themes are Kamelot, Edguy and Sabaton. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Samn Posted September 13, 2009 Report Share Posted September 13, 2009 First of all, let me introduce this post by clarifying that I am very new to objectivist philosophy, as well as this site, this being my first post. All of the discussion in the post has been geared towards popular music, which there is nothing wrong with, however, as a "classical" musician I would be interested in a dialogue regarding contemporary classical music and its relationship to Objectivism. I am a contemporary composer studying at the University of Michigan. My music until my recent encounter with Ayn Rand was very typical of the Avant-Garde music of the latter half of this century. For those of you who are unacquainted with such music, it is characterized by extreme atonality, lack of conventional melody, employment of not traditional uses of instruments, and ranges in approach from Aleatoric "chance" music, to highly mathematically complex Serialist music. I have experimented with all of these styles, the result of which is very bleak discordant music. Ayn Rand describes this sort of music in Atlas Shrugged and is clearly opposed to it. l understand that her philosophy regarding art is that it should be a clear articulation of the artists philosophical convictions, portraying man as he "might and ought to be", and consequently understand her opposition to atonal music, the justification for which is often the "horror and suffering of the 20th century world". I too am interested in moving my music away from this direction in the interest of forwarding a positive and joyful view of not only man but myself. However as a trained musician I find the technical, mathematic, and creative aspects of much atonal to be wonderfully innovative and interesting. What I am beginning to do is write music that opens with atonal language that gradually, through the incorporation of melodic elements, coalesces into triumphant, driving, and melodic sections. Thus representing a journey towards mans realization of his full potential, and mirroring my own feelings as I abandoned the bleak philosophies which dominated my life for the incredible self esteem which I have gained through Objectivism. I also am trying to incorporate innovative techniques that can be utilized in a variety of musical contexts, such as electronics, or extended-techniques, examples of which include plucking piano strings, or tapping the body of a string instrument. None of my most recent music has been recorded yet, so I am unable to refer anyone to it. However if the ideas I explained are of interest to any of you I would love to discuss them. I also agree with Pete Caya about progressive rock. I play in a prog rock band myself and find the sheer technicality of the music to represent something heroic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve D'Ippolito Posted September 13, 2009 Report Share Posted September 13, 2009 Could be interesting, sort of rising above modern atonality. Yes, I'd like to hear it. One of the fastest ways to get a chorus of agreement here is to condemn Schoenberg. Not many here are fans of the atonal. You're not the first who has said that modern classical music is technically complex, mathematically complicated. In a word, virtuosic. But geez, if it's hard and challenging to write, why does it have to be hard and challenging to listen to? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew Grathwohl Posted September 13, 2009 Report Share Posted September 13, 2009 One of the fastest ways to get a chorus of agreement here is to condemn Schoenberg. Not many here are fans of the atonal. You're not the first who has said that modern classical music is technically complex, mathematically complicated. In a word, virtuosic. But geez, if it's hard and challenging to write, why does it have to be hard and challenging to listen to? It isn't challenging and hard to listen to. Your ears are the challenged ones. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Myself Posted September 13, 2009 Report Share Posted September 13, 2009 It isn't challenging and hard to listen to. Your ears are the challenged ones. Remember what Rand said about "conditioning the ear?" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew Grathwohl Posted September 13, 2009 Report Share Posted September 13, 2009 Remember what Rand said about "conditioning the ear?" No. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Samn Posted September 14, 2009 Report Share Posted September 14, 2009 I do think the idea that atonality is an aquired taste, so to speak, is quite valid. I for one found atonal music repulsive at my first encounter, now, though I think of it as bleak sounding, I have no "difficulty" listening to it. Ultimately though, it comes down to personal values of aesthetic judgement I suppose. As far as my new style, I plan to have a movment of my Third String Quartet (My first Objectivist influenced piece) ready for performance by early November and would love to share it here once I have a recording. Also, what did Rand say about conditioning the ear? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob G Posted September 16, 2009 Report Share Posted September 16, 2009 I am not a musician, just a listener, a long time listener. In the past I have talked with one or two professional musicians who were performing “modern” music, and I was surprised and intrigued with their attitude toward that music. They considered the music a technical challenge. It was a thrill to them to be able to play it properly, hit their marks, you might say. There is nothing wrong in principle with music that is technically challenging for the professional. Classical music, say 19thC, has many parts of concertos for example, that are there just to challenge the performer. But that is not the purpose of music. Remember, Ayn Rand talked about the question of how the sounds, etc., of music reach our ideas, our values, and then our feeling. It is the emotions that music must reach. Being able to listen, follow, or figure out a piece may have some intellectual pleasure, but once you have that language integrated, the music then has to “move” you. You have to feel the music. Much of 20thC music leaves me angry because I feel defrauded, or depressed, an emotion that the 20thC seems to relish. Samm, I am impressed with your plan for a piece moving from the atonal to a victorious melodic conclusion. I am not sure that I want to hear the beginning. But I greatly admire your thought, and hope that your future brings many melodic triumphs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mojo jojo Posted October 20, 2009 Report Share Posted October 20, 2009 (edited) I don't know if this counts as Objectivis music, but I used Rand's interview to create a piece. I made a music video for it and uploaded it to YouTube - your'e welcome to listen, view and rate! Edited October 20, 2009 by Mojo jojo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tsiklon Posted June 12, 2010 Report Share Posted June 12, 2010 With regard to Objectivist music, I would say the ultimate objectivist band is Oingo Boingo, hands down. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wackyscience Posted August 9, 2010 Report Share Posted August 9, 2010 Well, I've listened to Rachmaninoff's 2nd and 3rd Concertos, and I think they're vastly overrated. Frankly, I hardly felt any soaring notes or any feeling of exaltation, as Rand describes in her works. I don't feel much of that with Tchaikovsky or Shostakovich either, and I have no idea how these three are rated as composers with an Objectivist touch. In my opinion, they have all made some pretty ordinary music, nothing superb or brilliant to talk about. The only Rachmaninoff piece that I think is really worth mentioning here, is possibly Vocalize. And also, loads of people tell us of how Jupiter by Holst is great as well. Well, I don't really think so. In fact, I'd rate Saturn better, although many people haven't listened to it. If you want some soaring pieces of Music, that really make you feel like you can stand up, with your convictions against 6 billion people, then listen to pieces like, The Bumblebee in the Transformers soundtrack, or the Gladiator theme, or the Schindler's list theme. There was a very good piece in The Curious Case Of Benjamin Button somewhere in the middle of the movie, but I haven't seen what it is yet. Inception rocks on the soundtrack level as well. A bit more classically, Samuel Barber's Adagio for Strings is brilliant, though it is depressing. It does touch some pretty high notes though, and I'd think you'd be a downright fool if you can't appreciate that. Try listening to some of Ludovico Einaudi's pieces, especially two, Divinere, and In Principio. Enya is pretty nice as well, although I have listened to only two of her songs. Richard Clayderman's Liebestraum is beautiful too, no doubting that. Pachelbel's Canon is pretty uplifting too. And I think Mahler composes some dark and beautiful pieces as well, which though sad, makes you feel a quiet, inner joy as well. And who can forget Moonlight Sonata, by Beethoven? If you're more of the rock-type, then Stairway To Heaven is indeed one of the most beautiful, epic songs I've heard, though the theme of the song is generally theistic, and I am an atheist. Still, try to procure that Orchestral version of Stairway. It is the most enchanting, heroic pieces I've heard. Try it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mindy Posted August 10, 2010 Report Share Posted August 10, 2010 If you enjoy Pachelbel's canon, just listen to Rachmaninoff four or five more times, you'll soon love it. Mindy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anonrobt Posted August 10, 2010 Report Share Posted August 10, 2010 Well, I've listened to Rachmaninoff's 2nd and 3rd Concertos, and I think they're vastly overrated. Frankly, I hardly felt any soaring notes or any feeling of exaltation, as Rand describes in her works. I don't feel much of that with Tchaikovsky or Shostakovich either, and I have no idea how these three are rated as composers with an Objectivist touch. In my opinion, they have all made some pretty ordinary music, nothing superb or brilliant to talk about. The only Rachmaninoff piece that I think is really worth mentioning here, is possibly Vocalize. And also, loads of people tell us of how Jupiter by Holst is great as well. Well, I don't really think so. In fact, I'd rate Saturn better, although many people haven't listened to it. If you want some soaring pieces of Music, that really make you feel like you can stand up, with your convictions against 6 billion people, then listen to pieces like, The Bumblebee in the Transformers soundtrack, or the Gladiator theme, or the Schindler's list theme. There was a very good piece in The Curious Case Of Benjamin Button somewhere in the middle of the movie, but I haven't seen what it is yet. Inception rocks on the soundtrack level as well. A bit more classically, Samuel Barber's Adagio for Strings is brilliant, though it is depressing. It does touch some pretty high notes though, and I'd think you'd be a downright fool if you can't appreciate that. Try listening to some of Ludovico Einaudi's pieces, especially two, Divinere, and In Principio. Enya is pretty nice as well, although I have listened to only two of her songs. Richard Clayderman's Liebestraum is beautiful too, no doubting that. Pachelbel's Canon is pretty uplifting too. And I think Mahler composes some dark and beautiful pieces as well, which though sad, makes you feel a quiet, inner joy as well. And who can forget Moonlight Sonata, by Beethoven? If you're more of the rock-type, then Stairway To Heaven is indeed one of the most beautiful, epic songs I've heard, though the theme of the song is generally theistic, and I am an atheist. Still, try to procure that Orchestral version of Stairway. It is the most enchanting, heroic pieces I've heard. Try it! If you're speaking of uplifting music, it is hard to beat Sousa's Stars and Stripes Forever or the William Tell Overture, or Saint Saens' Fifth Concerto... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly Bennett Posted August 21, 2010 Report Share Posted August 21, 2010 This song always picks me up: I think music is hard because so much of it is just people whining and wallowing is self pity. Everyone seems to thing that Depression is "Artistic", but to me it's just boring. Lyrics usually ruin songs for me because of the content, I have a hard time ignoring them. Even though its somewhat sarcastic, this song has such confidence that I can't help but love it: I'd really love to find some good, up tempo, lyric-less music - like Scott Joplin, but a bit more modern, and with a few more 'voices'. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly Bennett Posted August 21, 2010 Report Share Posted August 21, 2010 Also: Some of the songs from Yann Tiersen are good. but many are too defeatist. This one good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ObjectivistMusic Posted April 15, 2011 Report Share Posted April 15, 2011 I've actually started a blog about Objectivism in music! I've been browsing this thread to get ideas for reviews, and I'd really love your thoughts on what I've already written Here's the link: http://objectivistmusic.blogspot.com/. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.