Jump to content
Objectivism Online Forum

Debate technique

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

After having engaged recently in a debate I have few comments about debating technique.

When one is presented with a counter argument one should first strive to understand his opponent's position fairly - without distorting it and if the meaning is unclear one should ASK for clarification. The next step is to either:

- prove it wrong - show to be false or erroneous by argument or evidence

- or if it is true, show by logical argument or evidence why it not contradictory to your position.

-or if true and contradictory to your claim - acknowledge that fact - which further requires you to check your premisses.

It is very frustrating to be spending most of your time when debating exposing straw man. Argumentum ad naseum - one that employs constant repetition in asserting a concept without addressing the presented counter evidence - is also very frustrating.

Those things are counter-productive to bringing out the truth - which is the purpose of debating.

Edited by ~Sophia~
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Create New...