"AYN RAND" CHAPTER FROM "THE POWER AND THE GLORY"

Good Morning, today is Friday, 17th of July. Good to see the Study Group gaining momentum. Thanks to Josh for picking up the thread despite joining late due to OCON, really appreciate the speed of study. Now we need not postpone the group, as was the possibility being considered before. Thanks also to Greg for the discipline and punctuality shown. This has helped give impetus to the activity.

 

Lets continue the great work. It might look small, and maybe even insignificant in bigger scheme of things… But as Burgess demonstrated through his writings in “The Aristotle Adventure” and this book, its these small steps in various civilizations that paved the way for Renaissance and Enlightenment that transformed the world. 

 

Today I answer the questions posted on Monday.

 

POWER AND GLORY – THE KEY IDEAS AND CRUSADING LIVES OF EIGHT DEBATERS OF REASON VS FAITH

 

 

RAND : A PHILOSOPHICAL NOVELIST DEFENDS REASON – OBJECTIVELY SPEAKING

 

WEEK 3

 

 

AN IDEAL MAN, THE MAN OF REASON contd…

 

Q1. How was “The Fountainhead” received and promoted?

 

Ans: The Fountainhead appeared in market in 1943. It was sold to a major publication house. It received far fewer reviews than We The Living in both U.S. and in England. Some reviews identified theme of virtue of independence and underlying egoism in incomplete form. However it sold well, and its explicitly thematic passages implying support for reason disseminated her ideas.

She sold storyline to a filmmaker, and with movie the novel rose again to bestseller lists.

[ References :

a.) For close study of reviews, Essay “The Fountainhead reviews” by Michael Berliner in Mayhew’s Essays on Ayn Rand’s The Fountainhead.

b.) For general comparisons of reviews [between The Fountainhead and We The Living] Essay “Publishing The Fountainhead” in Mayhew’s Essays on Ayn Rand’s The Fountainhead”.

c.) For selling of The Fountainhead, Ayn Rand by Britting, p61.

d.) For her return to Hollywood : Britting, Ayn Rand p. 68.]

 

Q2. Why did she move primary attention from “Ethics” to “Metaphysics and Epistemology” in her thinking and writings?

 

Ans: While writing non-fiction book on the ethical principles in her novel The Fountainhead, she discovered that she needed first to further develop the foundations of her ethical ideas in metaphysics and epistemology. Thus she moved up in philosophical hierarchy.

[References: For beginning of non-fiction book on her ethics, Ayn Rand by Britting, p73 and 76]

 

THE FINAL NOVEL

 

Q3. What was the political environment like, when writing of “Atlas Shrugged” got started?

 

Ans: Rand started developing Atlas Shrugged in the year 1946. By that time World War II had ended, with National Socialist and Fascist states being crushed by US and its Western allies. This allowed equally destructive collectivist movement Communism to spread to Eastern Europe.

 

Also, during that time cultural atmosphere in U.S. was gloomy, and statism was rising during the Depression and the war. Further, there was no intellectual opposition to the spread of Communism at that time.

[References: For Rand beginning “The mind on strike”, Ayn Rand by Britting, p79]

 

Q4. Describe her general view on philosophy, and her particular views on philosophy of Kant?

 

Ans: Philosophy was her favorite subject of conversation, and she considered it to be a matter of life or death in its consequences.

Her evaluations, and therefore her emotions towards Kant’s philosophy were negatively charged. Because Kant in his metaphysics had claimed that there is no reality. And this metaphysics invalidates efficacy of your mind in its epistemological consequences. And values like your husband, your work, the music you like, and your freedom are invalidated in its ethical consequences.

[References: For Rand’s philosophical passion, Ayn Rand by Britting, p76-77**]**

 

Q4. What is a “theme” and “plot-theme”? Explain “theme” and “plot-theme” of Atlas Shrugged, working title of which was “The mind on strike”? How and why did scope evolve overtime?

 

Ans:

 

Meaning of Theme and Plot-Theme : A theme is the summation of a novel’s abstract meaning.

 

The link between the theme and the events of a novel is an element which Ayn Rand called the plot-theme. It is the first step of the translation of an abstract theme into a story, without which the construction of a plot would be impossible. A “plot-theme” is the central conflict or “situation” of a story—a conflict in terms of action, corresponding to the theme and complex enough to create a purposeful progression of events.

 

Theme : Theme of Atlas Shrugged was the relationship of the mind to reality, objectivity that is. More specifically, it was about logical relationship between facts of reality and ideas in the mind. Reason being the faculty that establishes that relationship. So the theme of Atlas Shrugged can be summarized as role and importance of reason.

 

Plot-Theme : What would happen if the most creative – that is rational people, in a society went on strike against demands that they devote their lives to the service of others.

 

Evolution of scope of the plot : Initial purpose of “The Mind on strike” was to show economic consequences of the philosophy implicit in her previous novel. Given the limited scope, she expected to complete the novel in 2 years. However, on proceeding she realized that she needed to integrate and demonstrate metaphysics and epistemology, along with ethics and politics.

Metaphysics of this world, epistemology of reason, ethics of rational self-interest, and politics of lassiez-faire capitalism.

 

Given this wider scope, the development of novel took fourteen years.

 

[ References:

a.) For the meaning of theme, Ayn Rand lexicon referring from “Basic Principles of Literature,”The Romantic Manifesto, 81

b.) For the meaning of plot-theme, Ayn Rand lexicon referring to “Basic Principles of Literature,”The Romantic Manifesto, 85

c.) For origin of “The Mind on strike”, and evolution of the novel. _Ayn Rand _by Britting, p73]

 

Q5. What was the plot of Atlas shrugged? Explain challenge in creating it, and role of Epistemology in fixing that challenge?

[Hint: The answer will require knowledge that is not given in the text being studied. Knowledge of Atlas Shrugged storyline in more detail.]

 

Ans: Plot is a logical but complex series of actions that the characters take to reach their goals. Actions of Dagny to build “John Galt Line”, or to find the destroyer. Actions of Francisco to convince Rearden to join the strike. Or actions of John Galt to ensure that the Objective of the strike is completed. ( Objective was to demonstrate the role of prime movers in the world, by pulling them out from society and causing the society to disintegrate because of their absence. And therefore clear the path for forming his kind of world. )

 

Challenge in writing the story : The major challenge of writing a story is integration, which involves three essential elements.

a.) Particular characters.

b.) Plot as a series of concrete actions.

c.) Theme as an abstract meaning of story.

 

The theme of Atlas Shrugged involved integrating metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, politics and economics to build characters and plot. The magnitude of integration involved was the major challenge in writing the novel.

 

Role of reason in fixing that challenge : Applying reason involves integrating data of senses into abstractions about the world. One role of reason is to integrate various characteristics observed in man to form characters. Similarly, to integrate various events to form a logical plot. The selection of elements for integration, to form characters and plot being determined by theme, also involves reason. And the theme itself is formed by observation and integration of good and bad actions in real world.

 

Q6. Explain concretization by explaining the role it plays in novel?

 

Ans: Concretization enables “Objectification of values”, which is the primary purpose of art. (Of course, it assumes that artist has some values in first place). Objectify means to make values real by presenting them in concrete form. (While abstractions are also real, I assume here real is referring to sense-perceptible). “I think courage is good” being the example of abstract statement. And presenting courageous characters like John Galt and Jean Valjean in stories being the Objectification of courage.

 

Theme of the story is the abstract value, and elements of story like particular scenes, actions of characters, and various other objects are the concretes that convey the theme. Rather than giving away just the Theme, writer conveys it through concretes. And reader comprehends the theme through concretes while he reads, and forms the abstraction(of theme) from these concretes. The formation of theme in readers might just be an impression(visual or part-visual plus associated emotions), rather than the theme in words that writer had thought of.

 

[ References:

a.) For objectification of values, Art of fiction by Ayn Rand, pp13-14

b.) For the artistic circle starting with abstract theme in artist’s mind, and ending as abstract theme in reader’s mind. The transmission happening through the concretes like plot and characters of story. Art of fiction by Ayn Rand, pp12-13 ]

 

Q7. John Galt speech was complex to create. How can you infer this from current text?

 

Ans: John Galt speech in the climax was a 35000 word passage. Ayn Rand invested two years in thinking it through, then outlining, writing, rewriting, editing, and proof reading it for accuracy and clarity.

(I read somewhere that initially she had thought that she will complete Galt speech in 3 months).

[ References:

a.) For the development of Atlas Shrugged, “Ayn Rand” by Britting.

b.) For evidence of development of the novel, Journals by Ayn Rand. Part 4(“Atlas Shrugged”) in general, but Ch. 14(“Notes While Writing Galt’s speech”) in particular.]

 

Q8. On what basis did she select the publication? Show that her apprehensions were correct?

 

Ans: Ayn Rand had no trouble finding publisher for Atlas Shrugged because of the success of The Fountainhead. She wanted publishing company that could withstand the hostile criticism she expected. So she selected publisher where management recognized that the book was a radical rejection of Judeo-Christian culture.

 

Reception of Atlas Shrugged among reviewers : The novel was attacked by both conservatives and the “progressives”. By former for atheism and egoism, and by the latter for defending Capitalism based on egoism.

 

[a.) For choosing Random house as the publisher, and for various types of reviews, Ayn Rand by Britting, pp84-85.]

 

Q9. Summarize Objectivism from what is given in the text?

 

Ans:

1. Metaphysics : Facts exist independent of man’s feelings, wishes, hopes, or fears.

 

2. Epistemology : Reason is man’s only means of perceiving reality, only source of knowledge, and only means of survival.

 

3. Ethics : Pursuit of rational self-interest and own happiness is the highest moral purpose in life.

 

4. Politics : Capitalism is the ideal political system, because here men deal with each other by free, voluntary exchange for mutual benefit.

 

[References : The above answer derived from the quotation in first column Ayn Rand wrote for “Los Angles Times” in 1962. Burgess has referred from “Objectivism” in Ayn Rand Lexicon, p344. And this “Objectivism” entry refers to “The Objectivist Newsletter”, August 1962, p35. The full text of the original column is available in the book The Ayn Rand column by Peter Schwartz. This book is a collection of twenty-six columns Ayn Rand wrote.]

Good Morning, today is July 20th. We completed the fiction part of Ayn Rand’s career last week. Today we start studying the non-fiction part. As always, today I will post the questions covering the section. Participants can answer those, or pursue other methods for studying the section. 

 

Here is the section for this week :

 

Week 4

 

NON FICTION WRITINGS AND INTELLECTUAL ACTIVISM (PART 1)
(Works other than Epistemology)

 

Monday, 20th July - Sunday, 26th July

 

  • Changing vehicles
  • A Philosopher’s provisional summary
  • Opening and Closing channels
  • Branch Books
    (Pg 233-241)

 

Questions

 

CHANGING VEHICLES

 

Q1. What factors contributed to her decision to enter non-fiction?

 

Q2. Apart from writing books, what means Ayn Rand used to spread her ideas in the initial years of nonfiction phase?

 

Q3. While writing about fiction writing, how did Ayn Rand present the fundamentality of connection between conscious and sub-conscious mind, along with the relationship between abstract and concrete?

 

Q4. Summarize / Describe content and significance of her lecture titled “Faith and Force : Destroyers of the Modern World”? Also specify connections she made between various branches of philosophy in this lecture?

 

Q5. What lesson can “New Intellectuals” learn from latter phase of Ayn Rand’s life?

 

A PHILOSOPHER’S PROVISIONAL SUMMARY

 

Q6. What is the content and significance of her book For the New Intellectual : The Philosophy of Ayn Rand”?

 

Q7. Who are four primary philosophers in the history of philosophy? Why didn’t they integrate their philosophical product into one volume? What we can infer about philosophy from this part of “history of ideas”?

 

Q8. How are philosophical ideas disseminated?

 

OPENING AND CLOSING CHANNELS

 

Q9. Describe various communication channels of Ayn Rand in 60s? Also describe how they evolved overtime?

 

BRANCH BOOKS

 

Q10. Briefly describe the books of Ayn Rand in different branches of philosophy(apart from the book on branch of epistemology, which is discussed in next section)?

Week 4

NON FICTION WRITINGS AND INTELLECTUAL ACTIVISM (PART 1)
(Works other than Epistemology)

 

Questions

CHANGING VEHICLES

Q1. What factors contributed to her decision to enter non-fiction?

A1. The biggest contributing factor was the conclusion that the culture was generally so philosophically corrupt that she needed to devote her time to nonfiction to elaborate and defend the philosophy she had presented.
 —pg. 234

Q2. Apart from writing books, what means Ayn Rand used to spread her ideas in the initial years of nonfiction phase?

A2. Public speaking, and informal lectures, private lectures, and workshops.
—pg. 234
 

Q3. While writing about fiction writing, how did Ayn Rand present the fundamentality of connection between conscious and sub-conscious mind, along with the relationship between abstract and concrete?

A3. Writers need to integrate their key ideas (abstractions) with sense-perceivable facts of reality (concretes), in order to avoid using “floating abstractions” for lack of the logical tie back to reality.
—pg. 235
 

Q4. Summarize / Describe content and significance of her lecture titled “Faith and Force : Destroyers of the Modern World”? Also specify connections she made between various branches of philosophy in this lecture?

A4. The crux of this delivery was delivered in her identification of reason and freedom being corollaries with their antagonist the corollaries of faith and force. Politically, the freest eras in history were the most rational, while the irrational eras are dominated by statism, dictatorships and tyranny. Ethically she advocated egoism after she indicated altruism as being at the root of many manifestations visible in the world at the time. Epistemologically, she outlined how the power of concepts were being directly attacked and/or being subverted. Metaphysically, she contrasted reason’s this-worldly approach to mysticism’s other-worldly approach.
 —Philosophy: Who Needs It pgs. 59-82

Q5. What lesson can “New Intellectuals” learn from latter phase of Ayn Rand’s life?

A5. Captured nicely by Burgess Laughlin this epitomizes the latter phase of Miss Rand’s life:

[The philosopher] has reached maturity when he spends most of this time expounding the philosophy he has finally understood rather than still studying a vast collection of the philosopher’s writings and trying to discover connections (integrations) between the various principles in the various branches.
— pg. 239

 

A PHILOSOPHER’S PROVISIONAL SUMMARY

Q6. What is the content and significance of her book For the New Intellectual : The Philosophy of Ayn Rand”?

A6. The content consisted of excerpts from her novels organized philosophically hierarchically. It was the closest she came to producing a one-volume, nonfiction presentation of Objectivism.
—pg. 238
 

Q7. Who are four primary philosophers in the history of philosophy? Why didn’t they integrate their philosophical product into one volume? What we can infer about philosophy from this part of “history of ideas”?

A7. Plato, Aristotle, Kant, and Rand. Engaged in working out particular philosophic problems, they tended to systematize them in their own minds, while noting or implying individual connections in appropriate places in one publication or another. This partly explains why a philosophy disseminates slowly.
—pg. 239
 

Q8. How are philosophical ideas disseminated?

A8. The Ayn Rand Letter
Vol. 1, No. 11  February 28, 1972
. . . And The Response–Part II

Newspapers [radio, television, movies, internet] do not create a culture, they are its product. They are transmission belts that carry ideas from the universities to the general public.

 

 

The Ayn Rand Letter
Vol. 1, No. 24  August 28, 1972
A Preview–Part III

The intellectuals serve as guides, as trend-setters, as the transmission belts or middlemen between philosophy and the culture.

 

 

The Ayn Rand Letter
Vol. III, No. 9  January 28, 1974
Philosophical Detection

 

If laymen did no more than learn to identify the nature of such fruit [the products of a culture] and stop munching it or passing it around, they would stop being the victims and the unwary transmission belts of philosophical poison. But a minimal grasp of philosophy is required in order to do it.

 

OPENING AND CLOSING CHANNELS

Q9. Describe various communication channels of Ayn Rand in 60s? Also describe how they evolved overtime?

A9. She tried radio and television appearances, a submission to the American Society of Aesthetics, correspondence with contemporary philosophers and historians of philosophy. Most of these avenues fell by the wayside as she bypassed the largely closed academia and mainstream mass media establishing a conduit directly to the “new intellectuals”, her most serious audience.
—pg. 240
 

BRANCH BOOKS

Q10. Briefly describe the books of Ayn Rand in different branches of philosophy(apart from the book on branch of epistemology, which is discussed in next section)?

A10. Three books listed by Mr. Laughlin were The Virtue of Selfishness, Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal, and The Romantic Manifesto. These expanded on her ethics of egoism, politics and aesthetics.

Additionally, Philosophy: Who Needs It, The Voice of Reason, and The New Left combined speeches and written submissions on topics as diverse as philosophy in general, to specific trends in education, racism as collectivism, and the space program.
—pg. 241
 

1 Like

Good Morning, today is Saturday, July 25. Today I will answer questions I posted on Monday of this week.

 

Answers

 

CHANGING VEHICLES

 

Q1. What factors contributed to her decision to enter nonfiction?

 

Ans : She devoted second phase of her life to present her philosophy using nonfiction mediums, contrasted to fiction that portrayed ideal man and her philosophy in first phase.

After publication of final novel, she focused on the state of culture where her themes were proceeding. The state was examined from three sources.

a.) Hostile reviews of Atlas Shrugged.

b.) Reports from university students in her circle. They gave information about intellectual state of academia.

c.) Issues brought by non-academic members of the circle during night-long discussions.

 

After examining information from these sources, she decided that she needed to devote time to nonfiction, and defend the philosophy of ideal man she had presented.

 

[References: For Rand’s change from fiction to non-fiction, Ayn Rand by Britting, p91-93.]

 

Q2. Apart from writing books, what means Ayn Rand used to spread her ideas in the initial years of non-fiction phase?

 

Ans:

a.) Public speaking in universities such as Yale, Princeton, Columbia, and Brown.

b.) Editorial review for series of public lectures on Objectivism by her associate Nathaniel Branden.

c.) Presented and recorded lectures on fiction writing to a small group. The forty-eight hours lectures covered aesthetics.

Later private lectures covered non-fiction writing and epistemology also.

 

[ References:

a.) For starting series of speeches at universities, Ayn Rand by Britting, p-94.

b.) For the first lectures on Objectivism by Nathaniel Branden, Ayn Rand by Britting, p95.

c.) For the timing of recorded lectures on fiction writing, Letters by Ayn Rand, p-xxi.

d.) For lectures on non-fiction writing, The Art of Non Fiction : A Guide for Writers and Readers by Ayn Rand, edited by Robert Mayhew, NY, Plume(Penguin), 2001, pxi.

e.) For private workshops on epistemology, Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology, 2nd edition by Harry Binswanger and Leonard Peikoff, NY, Meridian(Penguin), 1990, p-125.]

 

Q3. While writing about fiction writing, how did Ayn Rand present the fundamentality of connection between conscious and subconscious mind, along with the relationship between abstract and concrete?

 

Ans: She rejected the disconnect between conscious and subconscious mind. Disconnect that was implied by slogans like “For those who understand, no explanation is necessary; for those who don’t, none is possible”.

 

An artist she claimed, needs to have general premises in conscious mind. And to grasp those premises clearly, the grasp should involve sufficient number of concretes along with associated general rules. This way meaning of premises will become automatic to you. Therefore premise, the term associated with conscious mind, becomes part of subconscious mind through thoroughly understood and integrated concretes. And it is this automated meaning stored in subconscious mind that is writing capital, and therefore provides inspiration.

 

So lack of integration of key ideas to sense perceptible concretes will lead to “floating abstractions”. And therefore such abstractions will not be objective. Specifically for fiction writing, theme will be the abstraction, and individual characters and their actions concretes. [Listing essence of characters, and encapsulating series of actions into chapters and parts can be considered as intermediate abstractions].

 

For e.g. in Atlas Shrugged, “importance of reason” is the theme. Specific concretes used for “forming generalization” can be various industries, sciences, logic in philosophy, writings of Hugo etc. While these concretes are used for automating the understanding of theme, once understood properly the theme is used to generate concretes like Dagny’s character of a purposeful person. And actions like construction of John Galt Railline demonstrating “importance of reason” in sequence of actions. Character of John Galt also demonstrating reason’s importance, by identifying the prime movers of the world and destruction of world by pulling out these prime movers.

 

[ References:

  1. For her analysis of Artistic mysticism, Art of Fiction, page 2.

  2. For floating abstractions, Art of Fiction, page 3.

  3. For elaboration of the use of abstract and concrete in fiction, Art of Fiction, page 13.

]

 

Q4. Summarize / Describe content and significance of her lecture titled “Faith and Force : Destroyers of the Modern World”? Also specify connections she made between various branches of philosophy in this lecture?

 

Ans:

Content : Lecture on “Faith and Force : Destroyers of the Modern World” brought metaphysical, epistemological, and ethical points. Further, these points were related to contemporary culture of 1960s. Specifically, she defined reason as faculty for perceiving, identifying, and integrating the material provided by man’s senses. The ability to move from percepts to concepts and abstractions, is the differentiating ability of man from animals, latter being at perceptual level. Reason subsuming mental activities like differentiation, induction, reduction, and deduction.

Mysticism referring to acceptance of allegations without evidence or proof. Allegations instead resting on some non-sensory and irrational means like “instinct”, “intuition”, “revelation”, or any form of just knowing.

 

Significance : In this lecture, Rand presents not just her views on reason and mysticism in a digest, but also her whole philosophy. The definition of reason here was connected to the metaphysics that there is one world which is knowable by Human consciousness, that is by percepts and logic. And definition of mysticism she gave made mysticism mutually exclusive with reason. Because while former relied on percepts and logic, latter was based on non-sensory and irrational. Further, she broadened horizon of mysticism from just Faith to other forms listed in definition (instinct, intuition, revelation, just knowing, etc.)

 

[a.) “Faith and Force” from Philosophy Who Needs It(paperback) for the content being discussed. Pages 75-76.

b.) For functions subsumed by reason Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology pages 13-14(integration, differentiation) p28(induction, deduction). And Objectivism : The Philosophy of Ayn Rand, pages 132-134(reduction).]

 

Connection of epistemology to ethics and politics : The ethics for Ayn Rand, as for other debaters, was the payoff from epistemology. Epistemology of reason resulted in ethics of egoism, rational longterm self interest that is. Similarly epistemology of mysticism led to ethics of altruism. In politics, consequence of reason was capitalism, where peaceful and honest individuals think[and live] for themselves. And government only protects individual rights of citizens from [physical] aggression and fraud. Statism was the consequence of mysticism and altruism, because without reason as guide physical aggression is default.

[“Faith and Force” from Philosophy who Needs it, pages 79-81. And excerpt from Atlas Shrugged in the article at pages 88-90]

 

Q5. What lesson can “New Intellectuals” learn from latter phase of Ayn Rand’s life?

 

Ans: The philosophical scope of “Faith and Force” was much more than Rand’s previous works. The market her previous works had established, enabled “Faith and Force” to get transmitted into culture in the form of audio lecture and written text. And because her goal in life was central, as against multiple non-integrated goals, she could achieve greater number and higher quality of success. 

 

A PHILOSOPHER’S PROVISIONAL SUMMARY

 

Q1. What is the content and significance of her book For the New Intellectual : The Philosophy of Ayn Rand”?

 

Ans: The title essay gave current state of culture, history of philosophy, its influence, and the guide to “New Intellectuals” for reclaiming rational culture. Archetypes like Attila, witch doctor, and producer were used from time to time.

 

Also, it was a collection of excerpts from her novels. The excerpts were chronological, and also hierarchical. Starting from politics with excerpts from We The Living, to ethics from The Fountainhead. The Atlas Shrugged section also dealt with few general points about epistemology and metaphysics.

 

General points for epistemology being reason and logic versus mysticism. And this-worldiness versus other-worldliness being the general point of metaphysics. Detailed treatise on epistemology was written later though.

 

For The New Intellectual was the closest she came to producing one volume of her philosophy.

 

[References : For the dates of publication of this and the following works, Ayn Rand by Britting.]

 

Q2. Who are four primary philosophers in the history of philosophy? Why didn’t they integrate their philosophical product into one volume?What we can infer about philosophy from this part of “history of ideas”?

 

Ans:

Primary Philosophers : Primary philosophers originate the process of systematic thinking. They do it by presenting original philosophical treatises in epistemology based on metaphysics, which(metaphysics) is also mostly original. Further, they also apply epistemology to present treatises in Ethics, and most of the times also politics and on Aesthetics.

 

Apart from Ayn Rand, Plato, Aristotle and Kant are other primary philosophers.

 

[From Plato, I don’t know of any significant contribution in Aesthetics. From Kant I do not know of any significant contribution in politics. Except the fact that he admired French and American revolutions because they led to destruction of authority. Nihilistic elements in these events that is.(Politics of Kant from one of Dr. Peikoff’s lectures or podcast.)]

 

From their writings dealing with particular branch, here is what we can infer about the nature of text corresponding to primary philosophies. The content of each branch made individual connections with other branches at specific places(like epistemological ideas in specific ethical questions are isolated). But integrated volume of philosophy requires generalizing these connections, which was done by secondary philosophers of these primary philosophers. So while the primary philosophers loved solving particular philosophy problems, and systematizing connections with other branches in their mind, they did not present these connections in a general manner. From this aspect, and from the fact that “primary philosophy” is disseminated very slowly, we can infer that the subject of philosophy is really very complex.

 

Q3. How are philosophical ideas disseminated?

 

Ans: Dissemination is the process by which a philosophy and its implications are transmitted from primary philosophers to general public, latter being non-philosophical. Dissemination is done through intellectuals. The intellectuals are professionals that study “science of humanities”[like psychology, literature, political science etc]. And through them the philosophy is disseminated to people like university professor, writer, artist, newspaperman, movie maker, singer, and ultimately to the man in street. These people, and those studying physical sciences depend on professionals from “science of humanities” for various important aspects of human life like moral values, social theories, political premises, psychological tenets, and most importantly for the principles of epistemology.

 

[References : For the quotation about dissemination of philosophical principles to social hierarchy, For the New Intellectual, by Ayn Rand, page 25 of paperback edition.]

 

OPENING AND CLOSING CHANNELS

 

Question

 

Q1. Describe various communication channels of Ayn Rand in 60s? Also describe how they evolved overtime?

 

Ans: In 1960 she experimented with speaking at length on New York city radio stations. In 1961 she presented paper, “Art as Sense of Life” at a yearly Harvard University meeting of American Society of Aesthetics. She corresponded with contemporaries like Philosopher John Hospers and historians like John Herman and Brand Blanshard.

 

Further, her associate Nathaniel Branden offered courses on various subjects like principles of Objectivism, economics, psychology, and history of philosophy. These lectures were offered on media like audiotape. These programs were managed by Nathaniel Branden Institute. The institute also had book services by non-objectivists on subject of humanities like economics. The relationship with Nathaniel Branden however closed around 1967. Reason for closure given is his deceptive behavior in relations with her and his students. On withdrawal of Rand’s endorsement it closed.

 

After closing of the relationship, she started “The Objectivist” magazine. This magazine succeeded the magazine “The Objectivist Newsletter” in 1962.

[ References:

a.) For Rand’s radio appearances, correspondence with Hospers, and meetings with philosophical writers, Ayn Rand by Britting, pages 94 and 99.

b.) For “Nanthaniel Branden Institute” page 95 of Ayn Rand by Britting.

c.) For starting “The Objectivist Newsletter” and later “The Objectivist”, Ayn Rand by Britting, page 95.

d.) For documented details of relationship with Nathaniel Branden, Passion of Ayn Rand’s Critics by Valliant(Forum administrator Jasken)]

 

BRANCH BOOKS

 

Questions

 

Q1. Briefly describe the books of Ayn Rand in different branches of philosophy(apart from the book on branch of epistemology, which is discussed in next section)?

 

Answers

 

Q1. Briefly describe the books of Ayn Rand in different branches of philosophy(apart from the book on branch of epistemology, which is discussed in next section)?

 

Ans: The Virtue of Selfishness : A New concept of Egoism was on Ethics, and was written as an anthology. Capitalism : An Unknown Ideal was a book on politics, another anthology. The Romantic Manifesto : A Philosophy of Literature was her work on Aesthetics.

 

[ Meanings – anthology : Collection of writings, articles in this case.

 

References :

For publication of VOS and CUI, p97 of Ayn Rand by Britting.

For publication of The Romantic Manifesto, p105 of Ayn Rand by Britting.]

Good morning, today is Monday 27th July. Today we begin last section for study. Next week we will conclude. Here are the questions for this week.

 

Questions

 

A DEFINITION OF REASON

 

Q1. What was central theme of the book on Epistemology? Whats the significance of this book?

 

Q2. Why is the central theme mentioned in (A1.) the most central issue of philosophy as a whole?

 

Q3. What was the answer offered to the problem of universals?

 

Q4. Give content and background of the 2nd edition of Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology?

 

SHIFTING GEARS

 

Q5.  What was the scope of “The Ayn Rand Letter”?

 

Q6. Apart from “The Ayn Rand Letter”, what were her other intellectual engagements in the 70s?

 

Q7. How were ideas of Ayn Rand disseminated immediately after her death?

A DEFINITION OF REASON

 

Q1.  What was central theme of the book on Epistemology? Whats the significance of this book?

 

A1. The central theme of Rand’s book on epistemology was concept formation. The significance of the book was that it undergirded her entire philosophy by explaining and defending her conception of reason.

 

Q2.  Why is the central theme mentioned in (A1.) the most central issue of philosophy as a whole?

 

A2. Rand says “since man’s knowledge is gained and held in conceptual form, the validity of man’s knowledge depends on the validity of concepts.” I think one of the things Rand means by this is that if our concepts are not valid, we can dismiss philosophical analysis of our concepts as empty word juggling - and whether or not we can dismiss philosophy as empty word juggling is certainly a central question for philosophy! Another relevant observation here is that some postmodern theories of science seem to use a Kantian approach to concepts as a reason for regarding science as an arbitrary cultural construction, so this is not just a problem for philosophers, it is a problem for anyone who cares about objective truth.

 

Q3.  What was the answer offered to the problem of universals?

 

A3. We abstract concepts from particulars by omitting measurements. To apply this back to the example of the three men Rand uses, the three men all have different heights and weights, different hair and skin color, and so on, but these differing characteristics are merely different quantitative values along the same axes of measurement that are within ranges comparable to one another. So, concepts are not things intrinsic in reality independent of our minds, because they are entities we form by a mental process, but they are not arbitrary either, because they correspond to real measurements and causal connections.

 

Q4.  Give content and background of the 2nd edition of Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology?

 

A4. Rand conducted workshops with a number of philosophers where she answered questions about her epistemology, and transcripts of parts of these workshops were added to the book as an appendix.

 

SHIFTING GEARS

 

Q5.  What was the scope of “The Ayn Rand Letter”?

 

A5. The letter provided Rand’s views on contemporary moral and social issues.

 

Q6.  Apart from “The Ayn Rand Letter”, what were her other intellectual engagements in the 70s?

 

A6. In the 70s, Rand spoke publicly, oversaw a presentation of her philosophy by Leonard Peikoff, helped oversee the production of books on her philosophy in an editorial role, and helped produce a mini-series on Atlas Shrugged.

 

Q7.  How were ideas of Ayn Rand disseminated immediately after her death?

 

A7. By means of the Ayn Rand Institute founded by her followers.

Thanks William for the post.

Regarding,

> By means of the Ayn Rand Institute founded by her followers.

 

I think Objectivists should start using term “students” instead of followers for those who digest and spread Objectivism. 

A DEFINITION OF REASON

Q1. What was central theme of the book on Epistemology? Whats the significance of this book?

A1. Introduction to Epistemology was about concept formation. The significance in its identification for gaining knowledge about reality by a method of total reliance on reaon.
 

Q2. Why is the central theme mentioned in (A1.) the most central issue of philosophy as a whole?

A2. Miss Rand viewed epistemology as the most central issue of philosophy.
 

Q3. What was the answer offered to the problem of universals?

A3. Ayn Rand’s answer to the problem of concepts (universals) is that it is a mental integration of two or more units which are mentally isolated according to a spectific characteristic and united by a specific definition.
 

Q4. Give content and background of the 2nd edition of Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology?

A4. The content of the 2nd edition consisted of the original work with nearly 200 pages of additional pages edited off the transcription from 21 hours of private workshops held between 1969 and 1971.
 

SHIFTING GEARS

Q5. What was the scope of “The Ayn Rand Letter”?

A5. The Ayn Rand Letter presented her analysis of currently political and philosophic events using her philosophy of Objectivism to set the context.
 

Q6. Apart from “The Ayn Rand Letter”, what were her other intellectual engagements in the 70s?

A6. She spoke to the U.S. Military Academy at West Point delivering a speech entitled “Philosophy: Who Needs It?” She also engaged in her favorite form of recreation; discussing ideas among friends. She provided editorial support for Ominous Parallels and the Ayn Rand Lexicon, giving her final public appearance in New Orleans before the National Committee for Monetary Reform.
 

Q7. How were ideas of Ayn Rand disseminated immediately after her death?

A7. The Ayn Rand Institute was established after her death with a mission to disseminate her philosophy of reason.

1 Like

Good Morning, today is Saturday, August 1st. I will now answer Monday’s questions.

 

A DEFINITION OF REASON

 

Answers

 

Q1. What is integration? What is the relationship between reason and integration?

 

Ans: Integration in its broad meaning refers to the process of connecting one fact with another. And in its narrow meaning it means “finding one in many”. Like creating concept “table” after observing some instances of individual tables.

 

[ Meaning of faculty :

a.) Inherent mental or physical power.(Mental in this case).

b.) Aptitude for doing something. (Integration in this case).]

 

Relationship between reason and integration : Reason as a faculty of integration was the key point brought by Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology. This integration begins with sense data and continues till most abstract concepts.

 

[Here I think narrow meaning of the reason is looked at.]

 

[Here, and at other places, where there is no reference, it means that the text is by Burgess alone.]

 

Q2. What are the various functions of reason?

 

Ans: Reason performs induction, deduction, reduction, and proof.

 

Induction is forming universals from particulars, starting with percepts. Deduction is classifying new particulars under known universals. Reduction is tracing the induced universal back to its origin in perception. And proof is proving a conclusion step by step using available data. In general, reason includes the whole process of knowing reality.

 

Q3. What aspects of reason were there in Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology?

 

Ans: The book was her most detailed statement of the essential nature of reason and its application to philosophical and other problems.

 

[Reference : In the 1971 issue of “The Objectivist”, Ayn Rand mentioned that Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology contained the definition of reason.]

 

SHIFTING GEARS

 

Answers

 

Q4. What was the scope of “The Ayn Rand Letter”?

 

Ans: “ The Ayn Rand Letter” presented her analysis of current political and philosophical events. The overall context for this analysis was set by the philosophy of Objectivism.

 

Because of her own failing health, and the failing health of her husband, she closed “The Ayn Rand Letter” in 1976.

 

[References : For “The Ayn Rand Letter”, Ayn Rand by Britting, p105.]

 

Q5. Apart from “The Ayn Rand Letter”, what were her other intellectual engagements in the 70s?

 

Ans: She helped advertise her books to increase sales. From the many invitations she received, she accepted only a few. One of the speech was in U.S. Military Academy at West Point titled “Philosophy : Who Needs It”.

 

She oversaw the course on main topics of her philosophy by Leonard Peikoff. This was the only systematic presentation on her philosophy. Even after closing “The Ayn Rand Letter”, she continued to discuss ideas among friends. She also provided editorial to books by Leonard Peikoff and Harry Binswanger. Former writing Ominous Parallels, and latter The Ayn Rand Lexicon. She had also written one-third of the teleplay on Atlas Shrugged by the time she died.

 

[ References :

  1. For promoting sales, Ayn Rand by Britting.

  2. For Ch I of Philosophy : Who Needs It and public speaking at Westpoint, Ayn Rand by Britting, p105, p107.

  3. For overseeing the course by Leonard Peikoff, Ayn Rand, Britting, p111.

  4. For her last years pages 109, 111, 112 in Ayn Rand by Britting.

  5. For private discussions as her favorite forum, p94 in Ayn Rand by Britting.]

 

Q6. How were ideas of Ayn Rand disseminated immediately after her death?

 

Ans: “Ayn Rand Institute” was created by the advocates of her philosophy, after her death. The mission of institute was to disseminate her philosophy. Further, the institute archived her previously unpublished works and published those. It also trained additional advocates for disseminating her ideas, and they applied Objectivism’s principles to particular problems.

[References : www.aynrand.org for “The Ayn Rand Institute”.] 

ERRORS

 

I am sorry but I did one major, and two minor errors.

 

Major Error :  I missed questions from section Reason as Integration. So here they are.

 

REASON AS INTEGRATION

 

Questions

 

Q1. What is integration? What is the relationship between reason and integration?

 

Q2. What are various functions of reason?

 

Q3. What aspects of reason were there in Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology?

 

Please post the answers next week along with the conclusion.

 

Minor Error 1 :  I misclassified answers from REASON AS INTEGRATION section as being from A DEFINITION OF REASON. 

 

Minor Error 2 :  I did not post answers from section A DEFINITION OF REASON. 
So here they are.

 

A DEFINITION OF REASON

 

Q1. What was central theme of the book on Epistemology? Whats the significance of this book?

 

Ans: In her book Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology, she published articles presenting her theory of concepts and her solution to the traditional problem of forming them.

 

Significance : This was the single most important important philosophical work of Rand, because her theory of concept-formation was the center of her epistemology. And the epistemology of reason was foundation of her ethics and politics.

 

[References: For the publication of first edition of Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology. Ayn Rand by Britting, pp97-99]

 

Q2. Why is the central theme mentioned in (A1.) the most central issue of philosophy as a whole?

 

Ans: The issue of concepts is known as the “problem of universals” in philosophy. It involves validating concepts, since man’s knowledge is held in conceptual form. Specifically, it involves connecting word like man, a concept, to percepts pf various men and also their characteristics. In general, it involves connecting abstractions to concretes, and also to intermediate abstractions in the process of reduction.

 

[ References:

a.) For the problems of concepts, Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology, Ayn Rand, pI.

b.) For the example of man, Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology, Ayn Rand, p2.]

 

Q3. What was the answer offered to the problem of universals?

 

Ans: The definition of concept she arrived at involved following characteristics.

a.) A concept is a mental integration.

b.) It has two or more units.[Concept man referring to various percepts of man].

c.) Units are mentally isolated according to specific characteristics. [Various characteristics like two leggedness, speaking, and later rationality. The differentiating characteristics determined by the context in which units are separated.]

d.) The units involved may contain any aspect of reality – Entities[like table or man], attributes [action like walking, or adverbs like quickly]. Perceptual concretes[percepts of table], or earlier formed concepts[like speaking].

e.) The isolation involves a process of abstraction, which is selective focus to [mentally] take out certain aspect of reality from all the others.

f.) And uniting involves integration, which is creation of a single, new mental entity[word]. This mental entity refers to concretes that were integrated.

g.) Unity is in the form of definition.

h.) And mental entity thereafter acts like a single unit of thought, for forming later concepts.

i.) The process of forming “concept table” is complete when a word such as “table” labels the concept.

 

[In the text Burgess added “isolated” and “united” in italics. This was done to emphasize the two functions of reason involved in concept formation. Also, he removed (s) characteristic(s) of original, as it was not necessary for the definition here. The definition given here is taken from p10 of 2nd edition of Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology. The pages that follow describe the process in detail, and it leads to a more complete definition in page 13.]

 

Q4. Give content and background of the 2nd edition of Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology?

 

Ans: The second edition of Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology contained text from the four workshops Ayn Rand had conducted. These were conducted between 1969 and 1971, and were twenty-one hours in total. These consisted of a dozen philosophers, physicists, and mathematicians who had studied Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology. In 1990 the content of this workshop was published by Peikoff and Binswanger in the expanded second edition. The added content of this workshop was two hundred pages of recorded, and edited conversations between Ayn Rand and others in this workshop.

[“Foreword to second edition” by Leonard Peikoff contains details of these epistemology workshops.]

 

Again sorry for the inconvinience these errors may have caused.

CONCLUSION

 

Good Morning, today is Monday, 3rd August. This week we conclude the 5 weeks of structured study we were engaged in. I will reflect on this study-group, and idea of study-group in general.

 

This study-group, like all the prior study-groups, has sharpened my thinking, planning, execution,  collaborating, and marketing skills. The reason for improvements I think was the study process and also the content we were studying. In this fast paced world of hi-tech information feed, undivided attention is the most difficult feat to achieve. By mandating focus to particular section, I think we can improve psychological processes that require deep thought, and therefore help participants improve their thinking and execution skills. If I compare this study to the normal readings I did just after buying the book, there are many more positives in structured study. By studying Introduction in detail, I could connect content of chapter to a larger theme of “how ideas are developed and disseminated”. I can better appreciate different forms of mediums like recorded lectures, fiction and non-fiction books, and news letters. Also methods like abstraction, induction, deduction, reduction are better appreciated, because now these are explicitly connected to “central purpose of Ayn Rand’s life”. In short, this study has helped me to develop standards that I think will enable me to direct my intellectual activism more purposefully and cause greater impact.

 

Coming the particulars we studied, I think these were extremely relevant. Having studied Steve Jobs through multiple mediums involving written interviews, presentation videos, interview videos, lecture videos, 2 full biographies, and so on. I think deep study of individuals who deeply impact the world is critical. Every decision they make, and consequence of correctness and falsehood of that decision is so deep, that we need to analyze every aspect of that decision. And as we cannot directly see thought, the way we see product of thought. So its from the product of thought, and from presentation of product by experts, that we infer what it takes to change the world. So insights into Ayn Rand’s activities from childhood till the end, in such a short digest, I think can greatly help us improve our thinking and decision making. For e.g. , we need not feel very guilty about slipping on timelines of tasks, if we are convinced that quality of product requires extra time. I think we should be grateful that Ayn Rand didn’t just finish Atlas Shrugged in 2 years, or Galt’s speech in 3 months, just because that was her initial plan. In the long run, the improved quality has been much more beneficial than the saved time could have been.

 

Finally, the study has given me greater understanding of Burgess. I understand his suggestions, facebook posts, blogs, and studies much better now. After study I am confident that he will become much more admired now, than he was ever in his lifetime. 

And lastly, despite lots of advertising, the participation in the study-groups(including prior ones in www. studygroupsforobjectivists.com/) has been quite less. I think this is the sign of times we live in, and the nature of intellectual activism as such. While its impact is great, intellectual activism, like activism of people in the book, requires varied mediums rather than persisting with one medium and over engage. So I urge participants to spread Ayn Rand’s ideas and ideas of Burgess in various forums, and through different mediums we know of. I for my part have decided to take a major leap, even though I am only part-time intellectual. I will initiate the process of appying to write for a major right wing publication in India. This may give even lesser time for study-groups, but I am confident that now I can organize same or better quality study-groups more quickly. 

1 Like

And lastly, despite lots of advertising, the participation in the study-groups(… has been quite less. I think this is the sign of times we live in, and the nature of intellectual activism as such.

We’ve tried to start study groups in the past without much success. (You can see the history in this sub-forum.) At least within the forum, the total number of active participants is not that large, and when it comes to any specific book only a very small number would be interested in studying it. 

 

I will initiate the process of appying to write for a major right wing publication in India.

All the best with this.

I’m curious: what are some examples of such Indian publications. I know of “Freedom First” and I suppose the “Center for Civil Society” and the “Liberty Institute” have some  publications. I’m interested in knowing what else is going on in India along these lines.

We’ve tried to start study groups in the past without much success. (You can see the history in this sub-forum.) At least within the forum, the total number of active participants is not that large, and when it comes to any specific book only a very small number would be interested in studying it. 

 

While initially less number of participants brings some negativity, I think I will persist. Advantages and dissemination, even if I study alone is significant. Team of around 5, and even 1 more persistent student as we had now, should be quite good. Plus nothing to be disheartened about. Just because people do not engage intellectually in one channel, does not mean they are not active intellectually, or that our culture is doomed. But if somebody wants to be good in writing, thinking, and in some particular topic, from personal experience this format is as good as going to an university.

 

All the best with this.

I’m curious: what are some examples of such Indian publications. I know of “Freedom First” and I suppose the “Center for Civil Society” and the “Liberty Institute” have some  publications. I’m interested in knowing what else is going on in India along these lines.

 

Thanks for the good wishes. And thanks also for persevering with this forum to provide people like me such wonderful platform and springboard.

 

Here is the basic description of the magazine I plan to work with.

 

" So what is the new Swarajya or Swarajya 2.0 about?

Swarajya will be an authoritative voice of reason representing the liberal centre-right point of view.

In its second coming, Swarajya remains committed to the ideals of individual liberty unmediated by the State or any other institution, freedom of expression and enterprise, national interest, and India’s vast and ancient cultural heritage.

Swarajya will be a big tent for liberal right of centre discourse that reaches out, engages and caters to the new India in a manner that’s not arcane, abstruse, arrogant or self-referencing."

 

Further details here - http://swarajyamag.com/about-swarajya/

Today I close the study-group from my side. As concluded, this was personally very rewarding and intellectually stimulating. There are still couple of days remaining. Please use this time to conclude.

 

Recalling my first study-group, which was on December, 2011 from chapter on “Definitions” in “Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology”. I prepared 3-4 months for it. Reading not just the chapter, but also the preceding ones. Unfortunately due to personal conflicts and some psychological barriers, I could continue only for 2 weeks in a study-group that was around 6 weeks. I persisted nevertheless. Later that year, the second study-group from title essay on “For the New Intellectual” however was extremely successful. I chewed almost the complete essay during the timeline, also connecting it to personal experiences and Objectivist movement in general. Burgess was so impressed with the effort that he offered me to select the subject and title for next study-group. And so my contribution enabled me to collaborate on subject close to my heart, metaphysics and epistemology. Next summer we did study-group on “Reality” chapter from “Objectivism : Philosophy of Ayn Rand”. Most rewarding study-group has been the one on “DIM Hypothesis”. Almost any cultural event I now relate to DIM, and even my own thoughts and emotions. 

 

To summarize, in past 4 years I have actualized potentialities that I thought would take a lifetime. Study-groups eventually gave me confidence to do great things in life… Hope others can get that too…!

In conclusion:

 

No matter how many times I read something, answering specific question means going back and finding the specifics to answer them.

One question asked stood out with regard to why a philosopher seldom systematically outlines their entire philosophy into one volume. Rand had often expressed interest and intent to do so, but was constantly drawn into new issues to address and write about. Although not all her works are included on the Objectivism Research CD, this observation by Burgess underscores the importance of such a tool.

1 Like