This is an enquiry e-mail from Dr. Drive By ([email protected])
THE LEFT’S PLOT TO KILL CHRISTMAS
WHAT DOES IT MEAN?
It means that the Democrats’ denial of individualism can only result in the left’s capitulation to Imperial Islam. In its purely existential context religiosity rarely engages Attax and myself. However, its ubuiquity merits our scrutiny if not encomia.
What does one have here? Regardless the side one might take on the debate over America’s inception (i.e. supernatural vs. philosophically rational)Judeo-Christianity’s saving grace, as it were, is its proposition that an individual person’s mind functions similarly to god’s. In longer words, Judeo Christianity anthropomorphises its personable god and Christmas is his jolly birthday party (Dare one imagine quaffing egg nog and munching fruitcake in the presence of baby Mohammed?) Such a doctrine has had the salubrious effect of socialising individuals in such a way-post Thomas Aquinas-that their societies became those whose sustenance derives from production.
Islam, conversely, promulgates the notion that man’s mind does not reflect allah’s. Correlatively, the only factor distinguishing human cognition from animal is man’s destiny of reincarnation for eternity which, among other fun perquisites, makes a hell possible for one’s nemeses. This lead to an economic paradigm dependent on plunder which stifles creativity and innovation wherever it conquers. After all, according to their Ulama-Islam’s sacerdotal elite-, creation is forbidden men; it is exclusive to the deity. Instead, man is adjured to *consume* the looted production (which includes children and women) of his less spiritually inclined neighbours.
Before proceeding clarification of ‘liberalism’ is necessary: Collectivist ‘liberalism’ in the 20th and 21st centuries is inimical to that of the 18th which enthroned the rights of the individual citizen over the caprice of any polity.
The epistemology of the liberal left in putatively Western nations has much in common with the sentiments of Islam. This accounts for the left’s fear of offending Mohammedans, much less confronting their lethality. The mind Moslems prefer is determined by allah’s will. The mind ‘liberals’ desire consists of bondage to ones alleged genetic predispositions (that’s why they feign fondness of labour unions and racial minorities; it’s an appeal to a zeitgeist or Hegelian ‘universal mind’, but that’s a future post)
In homage to their ‘environmental’ myrmidons liberals do not seek the material advancement of any group; the merely dream of distributing an ‘equal or just’ share of somebody else’s ‘luck’. In their never ending quest for an exiguously adumbrated paradise-eating, drinking, fornicating-the Moslem obeys his tribe, al-Qur’an, and therefore allah. The umma comply to escape a vividly presaged hell. The liberal obeys opinion polls, ecological effrontery, and therefore the New York Times. The left acquiesce to enable the unable to consume the production of the able. Both glorify poverty and excuse brutality as long as they’re for a transcendental cause.
Now then, the liberals’ motive for killing Christmas can be seen clearly. Christmas is an expression of indulgence. Despite its ‘spiritual’ foundation the Christmas holiday is one of Capitalism’s more refulgent emoluments. Its very essence presupposes a culture of abundance and guiltless pleasure on this earth.
Thus ‘traditionalists’ in America have a choice: The innocence and good will highlighting the birth of the Capitalistic baby Jesus or the scene alluded to in al-Qur’an (sura 33, verse 25) which commemorates a seminal event in the prolonged birth of Islam during 627 A.D.. The ‘Prophet’ commanded that a great trench be dug in the marketplace of Medina. 800 unarmed men of the Jewish Banu Qurayza tribe were methodically decapitated and their remains covered over and ‘…Mahomet returned from the horrid spectacle to solace himself with the charms of Rihana, whose husband and all her male relatives had just perished in the massacre…’* Ooops.
Now one knows why there will never be a movie of the life of Mohammed. Who’d want to view such ordure anyway? Somebody stupid enough to pay money to sit in the dark with Karl Marx and Adolph Hitler. Merry Christmas, baby.
*Muir, Sir W. The Life of Muhammad. Edinburgh, 1923. And he got it from Ibn Ishaq and al-Tabari, Mohammed’s ecclesiastically acknowledged biographers. We got it from Ibn Warraq who is currently in hiding.
:lol: 
:devil: