Wazamino Theory about atheism.

http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/atheism?view=uk

atheism

/aythi-izm/

• noun the belief that God does not exist.

Q) can you bring ONE SINGLE IRREFUTABLE ARGUMENT that refutes the existence of God ??

if you can’t answer it then why you call your self atheist?

the word"does not exist"APPEAR!IF YOU CAN’T answer it THEN THE definition of atheism become absurd.

atheism

/aythi-izm/

• noun the belief that God [?!?!?!?]

the word “does not exist.” are removed now the definition become absurd now PROVE IT because you are atheist and by the way don’t use Creationist argument.

================================

My Own Argument : Teleological Argument

The universe evidences great complexity or design; thus, it must have been designed by a intelligent Designer Because design necessitates a designer.

================================

In order to answer this question of mine you have to follow these rules :

  1. Don’t go off topics ( for ex: fairy tales, Unicorn , Pokemon, etc… )

  2. Don’t plagiarize Creationist argument and then try to refute it .

  3. if you want to prove your position don’t try to refute my OWN argument (Teleological Argument).Try to bring one argument that refute the existence of god . We need balance her . Refuting my own argument and then you don’t bring your own argument is wast of time .

Being that there is no evidence to support the existence of god (no, complexity is NOT evidence) I’d say the burden of proof is on you.

Q) can you bring ONE SINGLE IRREFUTABLE ARGUMENT that refutes the existence of an invisible, insubstantial, transdimentional purple sky dragon who breathes clouds and farts blue??

Q) can you bring ONE SINGLE IRREFUTABLE ARGUMENT that refutes the existence of an invisible, insubstantial, transdimentional purple sky dragon who breathes clouds and farts blue??

Now Greebo, the nice troll asked that we not allude to fairy tales.

:stuck_out_tongue:

Being that there is no evidence to support the existence of god (no, complexity is NOT evidence) I’d say the burden of proof is on you.

Then why you call your self atheist ?!

atheism

/aythi-izm/

• noun the belief that :stuck_out_tongue: God does not exist. :worry:

My Own Argument : Teleological Argument

The universe evidences great complexity or design; thus, it must have been designed by a intelligent Designer Because design necessitates a designer.

Q) can you bring ONE SINGLE IRREFUTABLE ARGUMENT that refutes the existence of an invisible, insubstantial, transdimentional purple sky dragon who breathes clouds and farts blue??

You are violating the First law

  1. Don’t go off topics ( for ex: fairy tales, Unicorn , Pokemon, etc… )

Your definition says God not purple sky dragon :stuck_out_tongue:

atheism

/aythi-izm/

• noun the belief that God does not exist.

Then why you call your self atheist ?!

atheism

/aythi-izm/

• noun the belief that :stuck_out_tongue: God does not exist. :worry:

Because there is no evidence to support the existence of god. It shouldn’t even be a question of “maybe” because in order to form a hypothesis (i.e. there is a creator) one has to have some form of evidence to support that hypothesis. The hypothesis must be testable in order to prove its truth and since there is no evidence I have absolutely no reason whatsoever to believe there is a god. Show me why I should even ask the question “is there a god?”.

Because there is no evidence to support the existence of god. It shouldn’t even be a question of “maybe” because in order to form a hypothesis (i.e. there is a creator) one has to have some form of evidence to support that hypothesis. The hypothesis must be testable in order to prove its truth and since there is no evidence I have absolutely no reason whatsoever to believe there is a god. Show me why I should even ask the question “is there a god?”.

if there is no evidence then you don’t have problem to answer to my question :stuck_out_tongue:

Q) can you bring ONE SINGLE IRREFUTABLE ARGUMENT that refutes the existence of God ??

Q) can you bring ONE SINGLE IRREFUTABLE ARGUMENT that refutes the existence of God ??

Easily

Existence: “Existence exists—and the act of grasping that statement implies two corollary axioms: that something exists which one perceives and that one exists possessing consciousness, consciousness being the faculty of perceiving that which exists.”

Existence exists, and only existence exists!

May I suggest George H. Smith’s Atheism: The Case Against God

** Please use search. This topic has been discussed repeatedly. ***