-
°
Objectivism Is The Everyman's Philosophy
In the universe, what you see is what you get,
figuring it out for yourself is the way to happiness,
and each person's independence is respected by all
-
Rand's Philosophy in Her Own Words
- "Metaphysics: Objective Reality" "Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed/Wishing won’t make it so." "The universe exists independent of consciousness"
- "Epistemology: Reason" "You can’t eat your cake and have it, too." "Thinking is man’s only basic virtue"
- "Ethics: Self-interest" "Man is an end in himself." "Man must act for his own rational self-interest" "The purpose of morality is to teach you[...] to enjoy yourself and live"
- "Politics: Capitalism" "Give me liberty or give me death." "If life on earth is [a man's] purpose, he has a right to live as a rational being"
-
Objectivism Online Chat
- 0 replies
- 86 views
- Add Reply
- 36 replies
- 758 views
- Add Reply
- 0 replies
- 97 views
- Add Reply
- 5 replies
- 191 views
- Add Reply
- 661 replies
- 38932 views
- Add Reply
- 106 replies
- 3296 views
- Add Reply
- 0 replies
- 94 views
- Add Reply
- 0 replies
- 74 views
- Add Reply
- 0 replies
- 95 views
- Add Reply
- 1 reply
- 115 views
- Add Reply
Reblogged:The 'Dead Baby Strategy' of Islamists
By Gus Van Horn blog,
At Capitalism Magazine is an article by Alan Dershowitz about Yahya Sinwar's deliberate use of civilian casualties to sway public opinion in the West about Israel's war against Hamas. I give Dershowitz a mixed review. On the one hand, it's about time someone called out news media for its negligent or complicit reliance on the casualty figures Hamas has been putting out during the war:Dershowitz goes on to estimate that, of the 40,000 casualties claimed by Hamas, perhaps 10,000 were actually ci
How would objectivists respond to François Laruelle’s criticisms of ideology
By HappyDays,
I’m curious how the objectivists here would respond to the philosopher François Laruelle’s criticism that ideology distorts our understanding and perception of reality by separating it into metaphysical binaries, his criticisms of ideology seem similar to Slavoj Žižek’s criticisms, but if you’d like to read more about him to respond here’s an article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/François_Laruelle
Reblogged:Hysterical Ninny Costs Mother Her Job
By Gus Van Horn blog,
In Texas, a woman was arrested, indicted, and ended up losing her job, simply because someone called the police when she told her her son he had to walk home half a mile as punishment for misbehavior. Naturally, in this age of precautionary thinking, the most ridiculous, arbitrary, worst-case, make-believe scenarios won out over common sense -- and likely, the personal experience of everyone involved. I walked around for miles as a kid, and I bet my experience wasn't unique.Fortunately, parent
My Ethical Theory and Rand's
By Boydstun,
My Ethical Theory and Rand’s
Perception of mind-independent existence is fundamental to human consciousness, though not the whole of what is fundamental in human consciousness. “Existence exists, we live.” The act of grasping that statement implies that things exist, including you and I conscious living selves, our consciousness being something alive and being the faculty of perceiving that which exists.
No one understanding the statement “Existence exists,” whether uttered, signed, or
Russian invasion of Ukraine/Belief of Mainstream Media Narrative
By Economic Freedom,
*** Split from: Objectivists are working to save the world from tyranny--isn't that altruism? ***
>Just today I saw a news report that a gov't official in Russia had said that domestic opponents to Russia's current war in Ukraine will be sent to concentration camps.
What was the news source? Most of what mainstream media has presented to the public regarding Ukraine has been propaganda. Even many images have been shown to be hoaxes.
Ethnic Russians who speak Russian but live
AI and technological unemployment
By happiness,
Technology and industrial progress have historically eliminated less productive work and created more productive work because they have mostly replaced or amplified muscle up to this point. Except in limited instances, technology hasn’t replaced the average human brain.
What happens now that generative AI is replacing exactly that? It will start with lower-order vocations, but there is no limit to how many human cognitive tasks it can take over. Apparently it’s already capable of handling
Reblogged:Four Wins From Twenty Years of Blogging
By Gus Van Horn blog,
A Friday Hodgepodge Twenty years ago today, as a belated birthday gift to myself, I started this blog. I got the idea from a conversation at the pub with a fellow scientist who also writes on the side. The fact that I have outlasted this once-hot medium is a source of both amusement and consternation to me. I will reflect on this, mostly privately. That said, all such thinking must include both the positives and the negatives, and so it is that I shall kick off my thinking with four wins fro
Darryl Wright lectures
By HowardRoarkSpaceDetective,
I’m looking for some lectures from a series on motivation given by Darryl Wright in 2005. They’re listed at this site but without a way of accessing the actual content:
https://objectivistmedia.com/publications/1268
Reblogged:Irreplaceable, in a Comically Bad Sense
By Gus Van Horn blog,
Over at Ask a Manager, Alison Green presents her favorites from reader-submitted examples of broken (yet somehow also sacred) systems in the workplace. Fourth on the list is a funny (and arguably criminal) example of someone who took advice like Make yourself indispensable in almost exactly the opposite way such advice is intended:It is astounding, and -- based on the commonality of certain similar pragmatism-influenced business practices -- perhaps something of a commentary on our culture and
Reblogged:Improper Government vs. Mifepristone
By Gus Van Horn blog,
Back in 2023, I posted about the resurrection of the 1873 Comstock Act to ban distribution of the abortion-inducing drug mifepristone through the mail. I opined back then that the Democrats should have repealed that law while they had a decent chance to do so. They haven't, and The Intercept notes the danger from that perspective that a second Trump presidency poses:Yeah, but hasn't Trump come out against a national ban? you might ask. That may be the case, but even if he honors his word, he