-
Posts
4 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Tric
-
-
A disagreement on explicit politics or explicit philosophy does not imply (on its own) that one cannot be very friendly. On the other hand, even a close agreement on those things does not imply that one will like the other person. It is almost certain that there will be many non-Objectivists you will like, and that you will like them more than many advocate Objectivism.
I personally don't base my friendships on political or philosophic ideals, but this person had a history of it, and I thought he'd shed me from his life just as he did to another friend. Pretty crazy stuff, and hard to really explain on a forum.
-
You're compatible? If you are an Objectivist, you are advocating ideas that demand personal responsibility in every area of your life. The Socialist, if they are a true socialist, demands the exact opposite.
I'm curious. In what areas do you find compatibility?
Well, I was mostly using a figure of speech. Misleading for sure. Apologies.
Something I forgot to mention was that another one of our good friends, who happens to be an Objectivist, got into it 3 years ago on the same subject. They are no longer friends because of that night when they got into a huge argument. For a second I thought the same thing was happening where he would not associate with me because of my personal convictions. We get along great otherwise, but on economic systems we are opposites.
-
I have a friend who is a socialist and we really got into it several days ago. We're all good now, but for a second I thought it could go down that road where we just weren't compatible because of our philosophic ideas.
Is it Wrong to Work for a Public College?
in Questions about Objectivism
Posted
The schools already exist and you do pay for them. It would be like asking if it is moral to drive on the roads, Or to accept a social security check.