Since reading Rand, I've held the "X For Dummies" series in disdain, because even if they are very well-done and logical introductions to topics, the necessary first step in reading one is self-deprecation. It contradicts her philosophy, and Objectivists already have a bad enough reputation for belittling those who disagree with them. Imagine a self-righteous opponent of Rand being told to read the book!
As a huge supporter of Rand I don't see how admitting to a lack of knowledge on a particular topic and seeking to gain that knowledge is a form of self-depreciation in any way. In reality, I would argue that to continue on in life with the perspective that you are all knowing is more detrimental to one's self than reading a book to further one's knowledge, regardless of a book's title. I don't imagine any self respecting person would call themselves dumb, however, reading a book for personal gain is never going to hurt you. I also find it hard to imagine a self-righteous person being an opponent of Rand.
O'ism 4 Dummies
in Recreation and The Good Life
Posted
As a huge supporter of Rand I don't see how admitting to a lack of knowledge on a particular topic and seeking to gain that knowledge is a form of self-depreciation in any way. In reality, I would argue that to continue on in life with the perspective that you are all knowing is more detrimental to one's self than reading a book to further one's knowledge, regardless of a book's title. I don't imagine any self respecting person would call themselves dumb, however, reading a book for personal gain is never going to hurt you. I also find it hard to imagine a self-righteous person being an opponent of Rand.