Pericles,
Communism was in many ways consistent with Chinese culture. My wife is from China, and on our first date, just after she had finished reading Atlas Shrugged, I asked her what was the primary philosophical cause of Communism there. Her answer at the time was “Confucius.” Communism never arrives by accident. In the years since, I continued to try to gain a better understanding of Chinese culture. It is full of contradictions and there are many individual exceptions, but after many years I satisfied myself with how its culture tied to its history.
Also, your socialist friend is very poorly informed about China. There are lots of beggars, and hordes of people who are essentially peasants serving their local party boss, being exploited much in the way socialists claim that capitalists would. China’s forms of pseudo-capitalism (e.g. poisonous knock-off drugs and food, people-selling, government-run- sweatshops, massive corruption in the financial, construction and property industries, pull-peddling) involve things that both Capitalists and socialists dislike.
A couple of years ago in a small town, the Communist Party bosses put 8 year old kids to work making firecrackers to “earn” their pitiful “free” state education. Then the school blew up, killing lots of kids, and the party pretty much covered it up, blaming the incident on the village idiot. If that had happened in a capitalist country, this would have been on the front pages of newspapers for weeks, and the left would have started a movement behind it. Instead the world yawned, Beijing paid off the peasant families, the Chinese press semi-covered it up, and the case was closed with a tearful “mistakes were made” speech by a senior leader who never said exactly what these mistakes were or who made them. What story could make clearer the fact that it is the communist Party that is “exploiting the people” in China?
Some months ago I posted an essay about China in this forum. It combines business/economics/cultural analysis. It’s not “Objectivist” but I included some philosophical/historical points that I think would be meaningful to Objectivists. The “terracotta warrior” theme is disposable, imposed upon the students by a professor who demanded that kind of “thematic” background. There were a few items I disagreed with provided by my classmates, but I edited out most of them.
I’m trying to attach a link to the essay here:
http://forum.ObjectivismOnline.com/index.p…type=post&id=73
Incidentally, to answer an earlier question, Ayn Rand is known to a few people in China, but unless there’s been a recent change, not many. I stumbled across a Chinese professor now in Canada who read Ayn Rand’s works and published a summary in a Chinese literary journal. Here’s part of a correspondence he sent me:
"…
I came across Ayn Rand’s works around 1987, when various, at times radical
and subversive, theories, philosophy, concepts, ideas and values from the West
were “invading” (or being introduced to) China - which, in a sense, led to the
1989 Tiananmen Incident. As China was intellectually more open, academically
freer, economically capitalized and privatized, politically somewhat
de-centralized, and ideologically and morally disintegrated, a young
generation of “intellectuals” was trying to make sense of the chaotic reality
by looking deeper into the Western experience of history, modernity, and
postmodern conditions.
I read Ayn Rand’s “Atlas Shrugged” and “The Virtue of Selfishness.” I was
fascinated with her interpretation of moral issues. I thought it would inspire
lots of Chinese who were being torn between traditional, Confucian, and
Communist moral standards (basically collectivism and altruism), and the new
reality of capitalism (individualism).
I translated “The Virtue of Selfishness” into Chinese, and wrote an
introduction to Ayn Rand and her works to an editor from a prestigious
state-run publishing house, who was very interested. Unfortunately, the 1989
Incident took place, which put the publishing process on hold. From 1989 to
1992, political and ideological control was tightened. Then China joined the
international copyright club. This meant there was no way for the translation
to be published.
As far as I know, Ayn Rand is known to very few people or a small circle in
China, a country that is now dominated by popular culture. I’m not sure
whether the younger generation is even interested in philosophy…"