I have just finished HPB yesterday and it was very different from what I expected. Not that I didn’t enjoy the book, certain things leave me wondering…
Why did Snape leave his Potions textbook in the back of the classroom? Didn’t he own the book? Seems a little too convenient.
Why did Snape decide to return to Voldemort? As characters mentioned in the book - what made Dumbledore trust Snape so much?
In the cave with the Horcrux - since the cup passed through the barrier why did someone have to drink the liquid inside? Couldn’t he have just spilled it instead?
Who stole the Horcrux? Any ideas?
Isn’t it becoming sort of trite for heroes to banish their loved ones when they need them most? (Harry and Ginny)
The only thing I wished was that the book was longer - by 200+ pages or so. I didn’t really feel the flow of time in the book as well as it did in previous ones - a little extra material would have been nice. For instance they barely described Harry’s NEWT classes or how Snape handled Defense Against the Dark Arts. Overall I enjoyed the book very much and await the final book (If she can manage to fit the ending in one book!)
…I think that book six might be the end of Dumbledore.
Moving on, the adult UK cover has an advanced potions book on it. Interesting… Does this mean that Harry somehow pulled an O on his potions OWL? I dunno, I’d buy an E, but not an O… Or perhaps did Snape get his long awaited position as DADA teacher? But Dumbledore didn’t want him to do that… Maybe he told Snape that he had to let Harry into his class. I bet Snape would be pleased about that. If the pattern holds true, then Advanced Potions will have a key role in book six. *cough* *cough* Half-Blood Prince anyone? We still don’t know who Snape’s parents were…
This was unbelievably close to what actually happened and posted months before the book came out. Hats off to “non-c”. Down to the E in Potions…
I was actually wondering when Dumbledore was going to be killed off… I originally thought it would be Book 5, but no. Can’t say I still wasn’t sad when it happened, even though I had a good idea it was coming.
Maybe it was just me, but I didn’t feel like we got a look at the entire year, classes and all that, like the previous books. I was glad that Harry got to be Quidditch Captain though. Stupid McLaggen…
One of my questions was about Wormtail. If Voldemort sent him to “serve/help” Snape, where was he the entire year? And how will his debt to Harry play out? I can’t believe there’s only one book left. And at least two more years before we see it.
Another thought has occurred to me… Did Snape really change his loyalties? The way Dumbledore died, you don’t know if Snape was ignoring a request or obeying it. He even stops people from using the Crucio curse on Harry at the end.
Another thought has occurred to me… Did Snape really change his loyalties? The way Dumbledore died, you don’t know if Snape was ignoring a request or obeying it…
There is no way that he faked killing Dumbledore.
He used Avada Kadavara which no one can survive
Dumbledore would never “order Snape” to kill him
He only stopped anyone from hurting Harry because he was reserved for the Dark Lord.
Hahaha, I didn’t even remember posting that. Wow. Creepy. Well, I’m not a Super Sleuth for nothing. Anyways, I am at the moment compiling a list of suspicious signs that Dumbledore knew that Snape (or someone) was going to kill him.
For starters:
Dumbledore would never beg for his life. I don’t buy that at all.
Be sure to check it out my list and comment on my blog, I should have some of it up tonight.
My guess for the person who stole the Horcrux would be Regulus Black. He was a death eater, and RAB used the title Dark Lord to address Voldemort, which is what Death Eaters call him. Also, his name has now turned up twice (or more) in passing, which is a bit strange for a character we aren’t going to see again. Hmm, not to mention that the initials fit.
This was unbelievably close to what actually happened and posted months before the book came out. Hats off to “non-c”. Down to the E in Potions…
Thanks, by the way. I forgot all about these theories of mine by the time I had the book in my hand. Well, except the one about Dumbledore. I had pretty much figured he was a goner. Especially after that betting leak in the city where the book was being published. Plus, once you read the chapter titles, it’s pretty obvious who is going to die. “The Phoenix Lament” I think you can guess.
Another thought has occurred to me… Did Snape really change his loyalties? The way Dumbledore died, you don’t know if Snape was ignoring a request or obeying it. He even stops people from using the Crucio curse on Harry at the end.
Maybe I’m just thinking too much into it…
I don’t think so. I refuse to beleive that all Dumbledore’s talk about death being the “next great adventure,” and that there are things “much worth than death” came to naught in the end and he would beg for his life just like the next person. Nah, that’s not Dumbledore. But I’ll have more on this on my blog later. I want to have some good, solid, canon evidence for this kind of theory.
My guess for the person who stole the Horcrux would be Regulus Black. He was a death eater, and RAB used the title Dark Lord to address Voldemort, which is what Death Eaters call him. Also, his name has now turned up twice (or more) in passing, which is a bit strange for a character we aren’t going to see again. Hmm, not to mention that the initials fit.
gosh I’m making a lot of typos
That was who I thought of as well. I’m wondering if the other two horcruxes might not be the other House items. Luna could end up being the Ravenclaw heir and Ernie McMillan the Hufflepuff heir. I don’t have any solid evidence for this but it would give a reason as to why their characters have been around lately.
My theory is that Dumbledore is not in fact dead, but that he allowed Snape to kill him so that he would have a mole within the Death Eaters. Plus, with everyone thinking Dumbledore is dead, he will have the upperhand in aiding HP in the Final Battle. Remember, Dumbledore always had a reason for trusting Snape!!
Interesting theory but how do you explain that new portrait of Dumbledore in his office? Every headmaster has a portrait that appears there when they’re dead. It’s on page 626 of the US version. I think Dumbledore is going to help Harry as well in the 7th book but I figured he’d do it through the talking painting.
Also I’ve heard on other forums theories brought up that Lily Potter will turn out to be related to the Weasleys somehow…hence her red hair.
Interesting theory but how do you explain that new portrait of Dumbledore in his office? Every headmaster has a portrait that appears there when they’re dead. It’s on page 626 of the US version. I think Dumbledore is going to help Harry as well in the 7th book but I figured he’d do it through the talking painting.
I’m not sure. Maybe DD tricked the school into thinking that too. If he feignd dead, and no potrait appeared, then no one would believe he was dead.
My theory is that Dumbledore is not in fact dead, but that he allowed Snape to kill him so that he would have a mole within the Death Eaters. Plus, with everyone thinking Dumbledore is dead, he will have the upperhand in aiding HP in the Final Battle. Remember, Dumbledore always had a reason for trusting Snape!!
I’m not sure. Maybe DD tricked the school into thinking that too. If he feignd dead, and no potrait appeared, then no one would believe he was dead.
Nah, I think the only way you’d get around DD being dead is if he was a phoenix, which, after all, I am not completely dismissing. That blast of flame at the funeral was quite interesting… But I think he’s gone really. I’m expecting something to bring his voice back into the story, final instructions, a letter, a will, or the portrait, but I don’t expect to see him as he was again. I think it was necessary for Harry to move on.
And Harry saw very clearly as he sat there under the hot sun how people who cared about him had stood in front of him one by one, his mother, his father, his godfather, and finally Dumbledore, all determined to protect him; but now that was over. He could not let anybody else stand between him and Voldemort; he must abandon forever the illusion he ought to have lost at the age of one, that the shelter of a parent’s arms meant that nothing could hurt him. There was no waking from his nightmare, no comforting whisper in the dark that he was safe really, that it was all in his imagination; the last and greatest of his protectors had died, and he was more alone than he ahd ever been before.
You see? I think it took Dumbledore’s death to allow Harry to do what he had to do. Do you think he would be able to leave Hogwarts if Dumbledore was still headmaster? Would Dumbledore have been able to let him? I am certain that Dumbledore would have stood in front of Harry eventually. The way he did it however, gives Harry the chance to “walk into the arena with his head held high,” which, as Dumbledore was so keen to teach him, makes all the difference in the world.
You see? I think it took Dumbledore’s death to allow Harry to do what he had to do. Do you think he would be able to leave Hogwarts if Dumbledore was still headmaster? Would Dumbledore have been able to let him? I am certain that Dumbledore would have stood in front of Harry eventually. The way he did it however, gives Harry the chance to “walk into the arena with his head held high,” which, as Dumbledore was so keen to teach him, makes all the difference in the world.
Interesting. I suppose it all depends on where Rowling takes the series.
I reckon the final book will see Harry & his allies go after the remaining horcruxes, and having destroyed most of them come face to face with Voldemort and realize he is the last horcrux - the scar and all that, the last remaining bit of Voldemort’s essense…and he’ll then sacrifice himself for the greater good.