Thomas Sowell attacks the idea of “meaningful work” as popularly used, and he may well have a point. It is productivity that is the primary meaning of work, not its enjoyableness.
excerpt:
What is “meaningful work”?
The underlying notion seems to be that it is work whose performance is satisfying or enjoyable in itself. But if that is the only kind of work that people should have to do, how is garbage to be collected, bed pans emptied in hospitals or jobs with life-threatening dangers to be performed?
Does anyone imagine that firemen enjoy going into burning homes and buildings to rescue people trapped by the flames? That soldiers going into combat think it is fun?
In the real world, many things are done simply because they have to be done, not because doing them brings immediate pleasure to those who do them. Some people take justifiable pride in working to take care of their families, whether or not the work itself is great.
Some of our more Utopian intellectuals lament that many people work “just for the money.” They do not like a society where A produces what B wants, simply in order that B will produce what A wants, with money being an intermediary device facilitating such exchanges.
What Sowell sees in this idea of “meaningful work” is scorn for the commercial mindset.
It was painful, for example, to see an internationally renowned scholar say that what low-income young people needed was “meaningful work.” But this is a notion common among educated elites, regardless of how counterproductive its consequences may be for society at large, and for low-income youngsters especially.
Does anyone know the reference? Merely googling the phrase “meaningful work” didn’t solve the mystery.
A semi-random integration that occurs to me with another instance of a similar idea appearing, is that in the game BioShock there is a line of dialogue by a character who is being disillusioned away from the idealism that drew him to the underwater city of Rapture when he realizes he will probably not be a rich or famous capitalist hero, but rather one who “cleans the shitters.” But the moral case for liberty was never “it will make you rich” but that it is necessary for a moral society of peace and cooperation.