Metaphysics translated by Joe Sachs
Book A
1 - Aristotle says that art is about things that are usually the case, produces something, and often involves skill. It seems that art in this sense is any subject that is deeply inductive by virtue of being extremely complex or being heavily context bound. I would say that anything he says about art pertains more to what we think of as induction in the modern world than what he says of what is translated with the word induction (epogee).
Art comes out of many conceptions from experience, in a universal judgment or as from what is similar. This idea is even more like the modern sense of induction.
2 - Aristotle seems to say that people seek knowledge out of the freedom to do so and that knowledge freely gained is the best. This is explained mostly in terms of how scholarly thought is best accomplished when leisure is possible. But leisure seems to also suggest that knowledge can be pursued more deeply when one doesn’t need to worry about basic survival or warfare. If knowledge freely gained is the best, then implicitly, I think Aristotle is advocating freedom of thought.
3-8 - A history of analyzing causes.
9 - Forms are shared in so they must be of independent things. They must share in each by virtue of what is not attributed to underlying subject.
If forms were patterns, then there would be forms of forms.
Aristotle says that philosophy has become mathematical for people. He is pointing out that other philosophers of his time were overly focused on the abstract instead of observation.
Book a (α)
2 - Acting for sake of something requires that the process be finite.
3 - Mathematical precision is best for immaterial things.
Book B
1 - It is easier to know you reach the end if you know all the ways you can get stuck.
3 - There cannot be a genus of thinghood because the differentia needs to be outside the genus.
4 - If the one is not independent, the number of things can’t be either. If the one is independent, then how is any being more than one?
5 - If the forms are things like points more so than the forms own bodies, nothing could be independent.
6 - If the universal were independent then Socrates would be many kinds of animals. I think this means that if a universal is independent, it would have being - in which case Socrates would be an independent individual animal, independent individual human, and so on, all at the same time.