Jump to content
Objectivism Online Forum

Thanksgiving: The Producer's Holiday

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

Every year Dr. Hull posts this article, and I think updates it a bit. This is an excellent article. I agree completely with his premises - individual achievement, through creative effort, generates the abundance each and every productive person has to be thankful for!-EW

http://www.aynrand.org/site/News2?page=New...ws_iv_ctrl=1021

Thanksgiving: The Producer's Holiday

Thursday November 18, 2004

By: Gary Hull

This holiday is designed to celebrate, not faith and charity, but thought and production.

Thanksgiving celebrates man's ability to produce. The cornucopia filled with exotic flowers and delicious fruits, the savory turkey with aromatic trimmings, the mouth-watering pies, the colorful decorations--it's all a testament to the creation of wealth.

Thanksgiving is a uniquely American holiday, because this country was the first to create and to value material abundance. It is America that has been the beacon for anyone wanting to escape from poverty and misery. It is America that generated the unprecedented flood of goods that washed away centuries of privation. It is America, by establishing the precondition of production--political freedom--that was able to unleash the dynamic, productive energy of its citizens.

This should be a source of pride to every self-supporting individual. It is what Thanksgiving is designed to commemorate. But there are those, motivated by hatred for human comfort and happiness, who want to make Thanksgiving into a day of national guilt. We should be ashamed, they say, for consuming a disproportionate share of the world's food supply. Our affluence, they say, constitutes a depletion of the "planet's resources." The building of dams, the use of fossil fuels, the driving of sports utility vehicles--they insist--are cause, not for celebration, but for atonement. What if, they all wail, the rest of the world consumed the way Americans do?

If only that were to happen--we would have an Atlantis. For it would mean that the production of wealth would have multiplied. Man can consume only what he first produces. All production is an act of creation. It is the creation of wealth where nothing before existed--nothing useful to man. America transformed a once-desolate wilderness into farms, supermarkets and air-conditioned houses, not by taking those goods away from some have-nots, nor by "consuming" the "world's resources"--but by reshaping valueless elements of nature into a form beneficial to human beings.

Since human survival is not automatic, man's life depends on successful production. From food and clothing to science and art, every act of production requires thought. And the greater the creation, the greater is the required thinking.

This virtue of productiveness is what Thanksgiving is supposed to recognize. Sadly, this is a virtue rejected not only by the attackers of this holiday, but by its alleged defenders as well.

Many Americans make Thanksgiving into a religious festival. They agree with Lincoln, who, upon declaring Thanksgiving a national holiday in 1863, said that "we have been the recipients of the choicest bounties of heaven." They ascribe our material abundance to God's efforts, not man's.

That view is a slap in the face of any person who has worked an honest day in his life. The appropriate values for this holiday are not faith and charity, but thought and production. The proper thanks for one's wealth goes not to some mystical deity but to oneself, if one has earned that wealth.

The liberal tells us that the food on our Thanksgiving plate is the result of mindless, meaningless labor. The conservative tells us that it is the result of supernatural grace. Neither believes that it represents an individual's achievement.

But wealth is not generated by sheer muscle; India, for example, has far more manual laborers than does the United States. Nor is it generated by praying for God's blessing; Iran, for example, is far more religious. If the liberal and conservative views of wealth are correct, why aren't those countries awash in riches?

Wealth is the result of individual thought and effort. And each individual is morally entitled to keep, and enjoy, the consequences of such thought and effort. He should not feel guilty for his own success, or for the failures of others.

There is a spiritual need fed by the elaborate meal, fine china and crystal, and the presence of cherished guests. It is the self-esteem that a productive person feels at the realization that his thinking and energy have made consumption possible.

Come Thanksgiving Day, when some success-hating commentator condemns America for being the world's leading consumer, tell him that he is evading the underlying fact: that this country is the world's leading producer. And then, as you sit down to dinner, celebrate the spiritual significance of the holiday by raising a toast to the virtue of your own productive ability and to America's productive giants, past and present.

Dr. Hull is co-editor of The Ayn Reader and is a senior writer for the Ayn Rand Institute in Irvine, Calif. The Institute promotes the philosophy of Ayn Rand, author of Atlas Shrugged and The Fountainhead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Here's a Thanksgiving post from DennisBlog:

About 15 years ago, I sent a friend the Thanksgiving greeting shown below. As much as it meant to me then, it means even more now. I'm proud to say I've lived up to my own vision of what can and ought to be possible to a passionately rational man. Here's to the best within each of us.

Columbus02.jpg

Commemorating Thanksgiving, a recent TV newscast presented a reminder of how small the ship was that brought to this country its first settlers. It showed the great degree of risk and peril the new world travelers accepted for their values. That particular thread of civilization's progress seemed so precarious.

It reminded me of other historical threads of progress that also seemed precarious. For example, consider Aristotle's escape from the fate that took the life of Socrates, the revival of the influence of Aristotle by Acquinas, and Ayn Rand's escape from the Soviet Union.

Rather than finding this daunting, I found it inspiring. It moved me to think about what we're doing, how we're working to spread Rand's ideas in the midst of so much opposition, how the current cultural context is so precarious.

The TV newscast emphasized the role of chance in history. I saw the subservience of chance to the power of ideas and free will. I saw the courage of the new world travelers in their willingness to put their reason to a supreme test from within a small ship on high seas to reach unsettled land. And then, after that death defying feat, start from scratch to build a new world!

The sea of obstacles is apparently always vast. However, the power of reason can tame that sea and chart a course through it all. In this and all that it entails, I count my blessings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I recently heard, on a morning news radio program, an interesting (although dubious) historical account of Thanksgiving. It's common historical fact that the Pilgrims to first come here were largely unprepared for the difficult conditions and, by large measure, starved to death quickly. It is also taught in schools that Thanksgiving celebrates the day that the Indians took kindness into their hearts to give the early settlers a bounty during the difficult part of the year. According to the diary of the leader of the Massachusetts settlement William Bradford, however, their initial organization of the "City on a Hill" was a city in which all consumable and necessary production was to be put into a common reserve. Very quickly, this reserve dwindled and we all know what immediately follows. (According to the implications of the radio host, though not by explicit quotation, these people were also mandated to work a particular plot of land.) However, at some point they established a more individualistic method of production: People were granted plots of land and told that they could grow on it as much as they pleased. (Also by implication but not explicit quotation, they consumed their own product and perhaps only paid tax or tribute to officials.) By the time the first Thanksgiving Day was celebrated, they had so much corn that they were actually able to start exporting it. The celebration was, then, not a celebration of charity but an equal exchange and celebration with the Indians.

If so, happy Thanksgiving everybody!* Enjoy the fruits of your labor!

*If this story is actually a fabrication, then everybody should rot in hell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...