Jump to content
Objectivism Online Forum

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 04/17/23 in all areas

  1. Boydstun

    Age of Electricity

    Philosophy, Engineering - a life, a mind Interview of me:
    1 point
  2. Concerning Core Two of Rand’s ideas I find true, original, and important are these: The first is Rand's idea that concepts of any particulars can be fashioned according to a principle of suspended particular measurement values along certain magnitude dimensions shared by particulars falling under those concepts. This conjecture is important as a distinct position in the theory of universals. It has implications for metaphysics and for philosophy of mathematics and philosophy of science. I continue to develop the measurements-omitted theory of universals* and to put it to work in problems current in the philosophy of mathematics and science. The second is Rand's idea that value occurs only on account of the existence of life. Where there is value, there is life; and where there is life, there are values.* The first thinker who really got some grip on this idea was a philosopher of whom Rand likely knew little. Shoshana Milgram has informed me he was being taught at Rand’s university, but Rand did not take that course. His name is Marie-Jean Guyau. His theory of ethics was individualistic, against Utilitarianism, and purely secular. His book presenting this theory is A Sketch of Morality without Obligation or Sanction (1885). His concept of what biological life fundamentally is was somewhat different than Rand’s, and that is one reason for the differences between his ethics and Rand’s. I think Rand was mistaken in these ways: Metaphysics – Rand’s is overly deterministic. (a, b) Epistemology – Rand’s is overly to the side of the subject. Ethics – Rand’s is overly egoistic (a, b). Since you are interested in political philosophy, I will mention also that although there is some room for interpretation of Rand on the point, she may have made the error of assuming that individuals come to the state with their property rights in land (in the economic sense) already perfected, like their rights in their person. Murray Rothbard explicitly made that error. The corrective is here: a, b. Dormin111, what do you find true, important, and distinctive to Rand in her writings? What of significance do you find incorrect?
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...