Claire1964

I have no idea what a superstititious reverence for the constitution is. Explain, please. I am not an Objectivist, so I don't know what "Objectivists want." I guess Rand wasn't an Objectivist, since you can see from the quotes below she greatly admired that document.

That's what I've been saying. Comprehension problem, or do you just like to argue?

Nope. I would expel people who threaten to kill and kill Americans and who attempt to subvert the Constitution.

Yes, bombing groups of people is force. What's your point. Would you have invited avowed Nazis into the US during WWII?

What if said immigrants openly state their plan to overturn Constitution and kill those who disagree with them? If you say that not all Muslims openly over that, let me ask you: if I offered you a bowl of 20 nuts and told you 5 were poisonous, would you eat the nuts?

Absolutely agree. Totally.

Naw. Roark is definitely unaware of and indifferent to people. So, by the way, is Rearden. His unwillingness to even think about his marriage for 10 years is self-defeating, as is his unwillingness to think about the regulators of his business.

Sounds excellent. One of my (many) problems with Rand is her depiction of heroic people who are "unaware" of other people. Roark is a prime example. I also believe she suffered from some of this. To a great extent, I equate empathy with awareness and awareness with focus.

Rand would certainly not promote that. But I have always disagreed with her assertion that bad tactics must fail. I've seen the opposite too often. But poking fun at values infuriates me.

Hell, no. But that kind of success has never been my goal.

Good question. But just look at the Clintons. Forty years of corruption, and they are on top. AIG, the company that ruined thousands in 08 is still doing well.

The lamentable is that corruption does succeed. In reality, Keating would be a success.

But those traits do win at times, unfortunately.

Unsympathetic perhaps, but probably accurate.

So, all of Hillary's criminal actions are ok with you. Wow.

Ready, Trump is not perfect. Compare to Hillary: Fired from Watergate for lying Whitewater Ruined the women her husband raped Refused aid to Ambassador who was tortured and raped Lied to families of the dead Endangered national security with her emails Ended up with $6 billion of State Department money on her watch Supports continuation of socialized medicine Takes money to support Arab countries Denies Islamic terrorism Wants more killers in our country Wants to deny us our right to bear arms How does Trump stack up against her, with vague unproven allegations agInst his U, with his support of eminent domain, which has been used for years. I disagree with Tramp's stand on antitrust, but Hillary has a lot more against her. Hope I answered your question. So far, no one had answered mine.

So, you see Trump, who supports our right to bear arms and who denounces Muslim invaders, as a tyrant. But Hillary, who wants to take your guns and refused to give aid to Americans being killed, who is inviting more killers into our country, is a better choice? I honestly cannot answer that kind of thinking. It's foreign to me.

Failed casinos; name any creator who has not failed? Shady u; exactly what is shady? Embrace libel law; yes, he opposes lying, which is Hillary's favorite hobby. He's not perfect, but is a supporter of killers really preferable? Still no one has found one single accomplishment of Hillary's. I don't think anyone will.

So, you see Trump, who supports our right to bear arms and who denounces Muslim invaders, as a tyrant. But Hillary, who wants to take your guns and refused to give aid to Americans being killed, who is inviting more killers into our country, is a better choice? I honestly cannot answer that kind of thinking. It's foreign to me.

What? Expect what? Start by not being insulting. Rudeness is a sign of defeat.

It's not up to me to open your eyes. If you have the stomach to vote for a killer and thief like Hillary, by all means, do so. BTW, you have no proof of your statements re. Trump.

He's not a crooked businessman. Accomplishments: he's brought the deadly effect of PC to the forefront; he opposes ISIS while Hillary can't seem to acknowledge the group; there's much more. What has Hillary done?

Can anyone name one thing Clinton has accomplished?

I don't know know what epitomolue is saying, but I'm saying Trump is definitely worth the vote. Can anyone name one thing Clinton has accomplished?

Not an argument from intimidation. I gave brief highlights. It could be expanded if anyone has questions.