Jump to content
Objectivism Online Forum

Reblogged: IRS: You Are Your Relative's Guarantor

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

At RealClear Markets is a shocking story about the IRS coming after someone over a debt incurred by a relative:
IRS.jpg
The IRS once again spits in our faces and tells us it's raining. (Image by United States Department of the Treasury, via Wikimedia Commons, public domain.)
Two years later, and twelve years after her last interaction with the trust, the IRS tried to make up the difference by holding Pickens personally liable for the entire $10 million tax bill, as the trustees were out of cash for the IRS to seize. Never mind that by that point the IRS had had nearly fifteen years to protect its interest in the trustees' tax debt with all the tools at its disposal, or that the tax bill exceeded what Pickens had received from the trust in the first place -- the IRS still simply chose to target the next closest relative.
It is bad enough that the IRS exists at all, but so long as it does, it should at least confine its looting to the money of whatever individual taxpayer violates a given matter of tax law.

This is a new low.

Curious about the case, I briefly searched the news for the victim, and learned that, on top of the sin of possessing more money than another person, she will probably be relatively easy for the media to kick around.

This does not matter: It is an outrage that someone is being subjected to this kind of treatment, and the article rightly warns us of the principle at stake:
[T]he IRS tends to apply its most aggressive tax enforcement tactics against rich and poor alike. If the IRS is saying that it thinks taxpayers should be held liable for their relatives' tax debt, taxpayers of all income levels should believe it.
Pickens may not be the most likable person around, but she is hardly in a league with the Nazis and Klansmen often held up as examples of what we must tolerate in the name of protecting freedom of speech. Nor is she the guilty criminal who escapes jail in the name of due process -- which, by the way, she is entitled to.

Madeleine Pickens does not deserve this, nor does anyone else unfortunate enough to be related to a deadbeat.

-- CAV

Link to Original

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...