Jump to content
Objectivism Online Forum
Sign in to follow this  

Should rivers and lakes be owned?

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

Apologies if I'm creating a topic that already exists. I'm new here. If I'm being redundant, please just point me in the right direction.

I'd like to get thoughts on the management of a commons, specifically water resource commons. Under our current system of government ownership and management of commons, resources are price controlled which is leading to the depletion of water, the West's most precious resource. Obviously the solution to this would be to allow the price of water to rise to equilibrium in the market so that is appropriately priced for what it's worth and people are forced to have to start being more careful with it.

But the problem then becomes, do we allow rivers and lakes and streams to be owned by corporations? If so, for how long? And how do we respond to the inevitable criticism from the majority who will see this as a threat to a precious resource? 

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Create New...