Jump to content
Objectivism Online Forum


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Posts posted by tadmjones

  1. As with the case in the Wisc Supreme , Dr Linda Lee Tarver’s testimony at the Michigan hearings point to long standing problems with Michigan elections and Detroit in particular for decades. 

    Systemic problems with partisan control of elections isn’t anything new , calling it out and focusing broad attention on it can at least be a positive , going forward as they say.

    My hope was Trump could be an unapologetic American muckraker. Too much muck and apparently Maoists

  2. 17 hours ago, Easy Truth said:

    Anti-establishment? You have no idea what that means. It could mean defund the police. It simply means wanting change. You have no clue that it means being a liberal (anti-conservative). Ultimately you are fighting for an empty slogan. Similar to the woman who got shot, her children will learn she died for nothing.

    Slogans can’t be empty they’re more like verbal memes, the ideas they point to may be empty or devoid of intellectual merit , but an empty slogan would not be recognizable as slogan , no?

    Antiestablishment is pretty much the appeal of Trump, the ‘voice of the forgotten ‘ the diminishing middle class. Trumpism is a national populist movement, how is that not antiestablishment?

    The Establishment threw everything they had at Trump for years and just barely beat him, I’d say the jury’s out but it never really sat.

    A little birdie is saying the author of the article cited up thread , was Steele’s source for the dossier. Should her assessment that of Trump be taken with any grains of salt for an objective observer?

  3. et

    Which chamber is more powerful? Perhaps the fraudsters timeframe is longer than one or even two cycles and given most of the mechanisms alleged to have employed not the first cycle they may have been used.  The optics? , how many new members voted to impeach?or those more neoconish? Not to mention is/would this cycle be one to expect to see a split ticket electorate? What if the mechanics of manipulation only conferred advantages or opportunities to affect the top of the tickets? 

    And Joe Biden , Joe Biden? Most presidential votes ever? Man that’s a lot of Bernie bros.

    Breaking an algorithm and having to shut down to scan enough paper to make up the margins isn’t out of the realm of possibility far enough without a highly transparent showing of inherent validity. The narrative I see feels like wide spread reluctance to entertain challenges, why did they resist the opportunity to rub his face in it? Might even be better than a second lame duck impeachment, maybe they just did the one they could. Hell doing both would have been better. 

    A non bloodthirsty , (American) nationalist who uses jingoistic demagoguery, sounds awfully antiestablishment, I’m in..



  4. 10 minutes ago, Easy Truth said:

    From the Link in my last post

    This article doesn’t at all touch on the unique and extraordinary  character of a one of a kind , first time ever, unlike any other election, election.

    There are non irrational arguments that point to irregularities and there hasn’t been any well publicized extraordinary efforts to demonstrate serious effort was expended on securing the elections.If fact there are a lot of questions of the actions on officials in charge of a number of polling places , especially concerning chain of custody of the extraordinary number of mail / paper ballots .

    The narrative the article speaks to is only consistent if the media caricature of Trump is believed. It is just as irrational to believe in lizard shape shifters as to believe Trump is an insane megalomaniac.

  5. Every user of Parler?

    The report that Curt Shilling had his homeowners insurance coverage cancelled because of social media posts.

    Another report of a former staffer to Trump that was fired because NHL refused to do business with the company if they employed that specific employee for the reason of his Trump association.

  6. doug morris 

    I did originally qualify my hyperbole “barely hyperbolic “ :)

    And by public or very public I was insinuating online/social media presence. I doubt my butcher would banish me from his store if a conversation turned to the happenings at the Capitol and we explored the nuisances of the proper description/context. So perhaps my statements overshot a specific mark , but the volley is in the right direction, no?

  7. No need , gotcha.

    You keep implying that every allegation was fraudulent in and of itself every one. Every case being not heard was a legitimate consequence and that every judge or body made legally consistent arguments against every case ,every one. 

    As an example this particular suit and any relief that may have been granted  to the campaign was relatively inconsequential as far as the national results. Irrespective of Trump as candidate, an objective reading of the decision and the opinions of the dissenters was rather illuminating in electoral law cases , at least for this layman. 

  8. 24 minutes ago, DonAthos said:









    Thus, that Biden made up ground and then surpassed Trump in several areas as counting went on was not, to me, suggestive of any fraud, but exactly what was expected. But to others, they "went to bed with Trump in the lead" and woke up to find that Biden had overtaken him, and they were primed and encouraged to think that this was evidence of some kind of conspiracy. To join in an effort to "stop the steal," by which it was meant to throw out the votes of fellow Americans and overturn the results of an election that has been judged fair, by every individual and agency empowered to make such a determination.


    It isn't suggestive to you that something may be afoot in that Biden made up ground in counting of absentee/mailed ballots in the areas he needed to win the states he needed? And only in those areas, he won what he needed to win and not what he didn't?

    Every individual and agency empowered to make such determination? Did you read the Wisconsin Supreme Court decision and the dissenting opinions?

    "During oral arguments in this case, Justice Jill J. Karofsky made  the  following  statement  (among  others)  to  the  President's attorney:  "You want us to overturn this electionso that your king  can  stay  in  power,  and  that  is  so  un-American."    When  a justice  displays  such  overt  political  bias,  the  public's confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary is destroyed." From a footnote in a dissenting opinion.

    The dissenters in this case show rather convincingly that "laches" was wholly misused to render a majority decision to not even look at the merits of the challenges.

    Wisconsin is just one example of the type of legal remedy that was afforded to the Trump campaign. The unprecedented amount of mail in/ absentee balloting that is an obvious invitation to fraud and malfeasance gave ample opportunity to bad actors to manipulate the counts in myriad ways. Proof that that did not occur is sourly lacking and that lacking only furthers conspiratorial passions, those passions I fear where and are being stoked purposely , after all it is what the Color Revolution playbook calls for.

  9. Was every allegation of fraud proven false by forensic examination of the ballots?

    Were the elections in every state carried out according to their own and federal constitutional requirements?

    Most cases were dismissed on standing and other jurisprudential findings , not on a full hearing of evidence or discovery.

    Did TX and seventeen other states irrationally petition SCOTUS ? Sycophants the lot ?



  10. 13 minutes ago, Doug Morris said:

    Do you have any examples of this?

    I would be disinclined to call Trump a Nazi because he has not committed murder on the scale of the Nazis.  I'm not worried about this getting me in trouble. 

    Forbes’s recent statement. Calls from democrat politicians to list Trump ‘sycophants and fabulists ‘and deny them employment or the ability to hold office. Wear a MAGA hat. Smile in a manner that is potentially smirkish. Question the validity of the election results, stuff like that.

  11. 39 minutes ago, Easy Truth said:

    It's a free country. They should be allowed to deplatform you even if they didn't like your hairdo. It's not like the government did it. "No shoes no shirt no service" should be illegal now?

    I didn't make any comment about government intervention, I simply stated that if you disagree loudly enough with whatever woke narrative is the narrative du jour you will be treated publicly as a pariah.

  12. 4 hours ago, tadmjones said:

    And you damn well better describe the DC situation that way , in public, if you need things like banking services. And unfortunately that is barely hyperbolic.

    2 hours ago, Doug Morris said:

    Can you explain your reasoning here more fully?

    If you disagree with any 'Trump is a nazi' narrative bigly enough in public, woke corporations will deplatform you and deny you their services.

  13. 21 minutes ago, dream_weaver said:

    Riots break out over the country, zones were even created in some parts to accommodate rioters while apologists tried to veil it as free-speech and dismiss the looting as not directly injurious to the life of the looted. A riot breaks out in Washington DC and it is escalated to an insurrection.

    And you damn well better describe the DC situation that way , in public, if you need things like banking services. And unfortunately that is barely hyperbolic.

  14. Capitalism is as capitalism does. The concept is a product of epistemology but the practice is metaphysical.

    Maybe the 'modern' term should be quantum capitalism, as in trying to measure and identify in order to label misses and changes the target. Collapses the normative wave function.

    Adam Smith's invisible hand is the Newtonian apple viewing the economic strategies and interplays of nascent nation states. The Enlightenment and Industrial Revolution honed economic power and concentrated it in smaller and  more compact entities , that could function by cooperation as in corporations or be guided by individuals. Perhaps Rand could be analogous to Einstein in that she provides the space time fabric of a moral justification as a lens. Newtonian principles are comfortable to everyday experiences and don't necessarily contradict a heretofore nonexistent theory of everything , but Einstein doesn't yet provide it either.


  • Create New...