Jump to content
Objectivism Online Forum

Abhijeet Melkani

Newbies
  • Content Count

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Abhijeet Melkani

  • Rank
    Newbie

Previous Fields

  • Country
    India
  • State (US/Canadian)
    Not Specified
  • Relationship status
    Single
  • Real Name
    Prince OP
  • Copyright
    Copyrighted
  • Biography/Intro
    Hi! I am a physics student currently. I also take a lot of interest in computer science and literature.
  • Experience with Objectivism
    All of Ayn Rand's novels and her Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology
  • School or University
    IIT Bombay
  • Occupation
    Physicist

Recent Profile Visitors

548 profile views
  1. Let me further elaborate my position: The same physical entity can be classified into the different categorical concepts of ... -> furniture -> chair -> rocking chair ... according to the level of measurements you choose to retain/omit. Similarly, a physical entity can be treated, in science, as a member of different categorical concepts/mathematical models depending on what level of coarseness of information we are interested in. ...-> ideal-gas-molecule -> molecule-with-internal-properties-like-magnetic-moment -> many-body-quantum-system-of-n-dimensions -> ...
  2. Measurement-omission in mathematical models.Mathematical models are special kind of models and they too involve particular measurement omissions and the preservation of generalities of special-case events/objects of reality.These measurement omissions in the physical context must be dictated essentially by the scale of time and change-magnitude:1) The lower bound of the energies that can be measured. Eg: The fine structure of hydrogen-spectrum can be omitted.2) The lower bound to the frequency of recurrence of events that can be measured. Eg: The rotation of the earth about its axis is too slo
  3. For some time I have been having qualms about how Objectivist ethics was formulated by Ayn Rand.Her argument starts with the idea that the fundamental choice, without which no other choice is even possible, is the choice of life over death. (Since only a living being can make any further choices). But I do not see how that makes life the ultimate value - in the sense of the exclusive standard of morality. Life is, granted, necessary for the pursuit of any other values, but is life (and all other values based on the standard of life) sufficient? In other words, after having achieved that which
×
×
  • Create New...