Capitalism Forever Posted January 5, 2006 Report Share Posted January 5, 2006 http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=1467683 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thales Posted January 6, 2006 Report Share Posted January 6, 2006 That's really encouraging. The way they speak so freely, it makes you wonder what is really going on over there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capitalism Forever Posted January 6, 2006 Author Report Share Posted January 6, 2006 The new generation is not repeating the mistakes of the old one. One way or the other, the mullahs are going to lose their power--the question is only how much damage they are allowed to do before it happens. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Styles2112 Posted February 15, 2006 Report Share Posted February 15, 2006 That's really encouraging. The way they speak so freely, it makes you wonder what is really going on over there. Well, like they said....with such a large population of younger folk...the government can't afford to lose their support. If we want to hurt Iran...that's where we need to hit them. Take their young, metaphorically, away from them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DavidOdden Posted February 15, 2006 Report Share Posted February 15, 2006 Well, like they said....with such a large population of younger folk...the government can't afford to lose their support. If we want to hurt Iran...that's where we need to hit them. Take their young, metaphorically, away from them.I have this optimistic streak in me when it comes to Iran, and yet... I also remember that the Islamist revolution that installed the current theocracy over 25 years ago was a youth movement; and "the support of the young" matters only in a democratic society, which Iran is not. Not only are elections not free and open (excluding "unacceptable" candidates is SOP), but the youth largely boycotted the last elections when Satan was elected. It would be interesting, though, to do a follow-up to see what becomes of some of those kids -- how many of them are arrested or killed by Vevak in the next month or year as a consequence of speaking against the government. Perhaps in 50 years when those now in power are gone and these youth are in charge of Iran, things will change, as long as the youth keep hold of their ideal of freedom. The situation since June has gotten vastly worse, and my analysis of the situation is that a significant economic downturn that was attributable to the present Iranian government could be the most effective weapon for political change. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Posted February 15, 2006 Report Share Posted February 15, 2006 (edited) ... when Satan was elected. Nice. I once heard a question about Sadam Hussein: Why do you make someone the leader of a country whose name is Sodamn Insane? Edited February 15, 2006 by Felix Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Styles2112 Posted February 16, 2006 Report Share Posted February 16, 2006 (edited) I have this optimistic streak in me when it comes to Iran, and yet... I also remember that the Islamist revolution that installed the current theocracy over 25 years ago was a youth movement; and "the support of the young" matters only in a democratic society, which Iran is not. Not only are elections not free and open (excluding "unacceptable" candidates is SOP), but the youth largely boycotted the last elections when Satan was elected. It would be interesting, though, to do a follow-up to see what becomes of some of those kids -- how many of them are arrested or killed by Vevak in the next month or year as a consequence of speaking against the government. Perhaps in 50 years when those now in power are gone and these youth are in charge of Iran, things will change, as long as the youth keep hold of their ideal of freedom. The situation since June has gotten vastly worse, and my analysis of the situation is that a significant economic downturn that was attributable to the present Iranian government could be the most effective weapon for political change. I would agree with that. It seems such a shame too. I imagine it must be close to IMPOSSIBLE to even start anything resembling organized that could possibly further their cause. That, and it seems almost paradoxal that one should have to fight and, possibly die, just to have some fun and freedom (in terms of the video.) For them, it comes down to "I really like this kind of fun, and I would like more freedoms, but I'm not sure I'm willing to die for it, yet." It makes you wonder where the line is. On the other hand, I've often wondered the same thing about christians. Edited February 16, 2006 by Styles2112 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DavidOdden Posted February 16, 2006 Report Share Posted February 16, 2006 I imagine it must be close to IMPOSSIBLE to even start anything resembling organized that could possibly further their cause.Something unorganized is workable. Change the epistemology of one Iranian youth, and he may spread that to 5 others. Admittedly, there's a reasonable chance that the youth's epistemological awakening will result in him not going back, but maybe... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DavidOdden Posted February 19, 2006 Report Share Posted February 19, 2006 Perhaps the older establishment in Iran can be influenced through th universal language of music, as proven here. Thanks, Coop. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gags Posted February 19, 2006 Report Share Posted February 19, 2006 I hope the young people in Iran don't wait too long to push for change. Iran's hard-line Islamic spiritual leaders have issued an unprecedented fatwa, or holy order, approving the use of atomic weapons against the country's enemies. Muslim clerics for the first time have questioned the theocracy's traditional viewpoint that Shariah law forbids the use of nuclear weapons. http://insider.washingtontimes.com/article...18-115245-5182r Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dismuke Posted February 19, 2006 Report Share Posted February 19, 2006 That's really encouraging. The way they speak so freely, it makes you wonder what is really going on over there. I think that is part of the reason why the rulers over there are saying the things that they are and openly trying to provoke a confrontation with the USA. I think they realize if they don't act that their days are numbered. A war will deflect some of the attention away from domestic troubles and, if they win, it will certainly strengthen their hand at home. And I think they have come to the conclusion that they might be able to win a war because they will have a steadfast ally in the United States operating on their behalf at all times: the American Left. All they have to do is create some sort of stalemate situation and wait for a negotiated peace. That is, thanks to the Left, if the Bush Administration even has the stomach to go to war again in the first place. I think the mullahs realize that their hand is as strong right now as it will ever be and they are trying to play it accordingly. What makes such people very dangerous is they are of the mindset that, if they can't be in charge, they would rather be dead and take everyone else along with them. In a way, that is a similar mindset that the Left in this country has: they would rather have an emasculated America with them calling the shots than a thriving and prosperous American with them permanently out of power. And they too, know, that their days are numbered unless desperate measures are taken. That is why they are natural allies. Both camps are ultimately doomed in the long term. But in the short term, they are highly dangerous and have to be taken out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.