Jump to content
Objectivism Online Forum


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Everything posted by tadmjones

  1. Good question, DC v. Heller means , currently, SCOTUS holds that the right to keep and bear arms is vested in individuals , but allows for constitutional regulation. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/second_amendment I haven't looked too deeply into the various legal arguments and legal theory surrounding the Amendment, but I wager it has to do with the 'commas' and wording "..necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms , shall not be infringed" . But to me, it 'feels' like, the intent was to allow for militias as a government function of the individual states ( as protection against federalized encroachment and to secure themselves against possible actions from other free states) , and including the right of individuals to own fire arms, because of the use of the words 'free state' and subsequently the use of the word 'people'. The phrase 'shall not be infringed' implies they viewed possession of fire arms as a 'natural' right.
  2. I’ve also always assumed the intent of the phrasing meant the militias would be funded by the separate states. Was there ever a period where the states had a tradition of militia as regular intrastate function? Ive never looked into that aspect of US military history, but again assumed the practice was common mostly from reflecting on the naming of units in say Civil War histories.
  3. The Soviet system didn’t atrophy ? The breakup was precipitated by armed citizenry revolution?
  4. Has it ever been the case that ordinary citizens could overthrow a government without a military force? The founders recognized that aspect of societal structure , no? That is what was meant about state militias , allowing the individual sovereign states the ability to defend from encroachment of the federalized forces , yes ?
  5. He was talking about how there has always been a limitation on weapons since the inception of the 2nd amendment, and that his administration would have a zero tolerance policy toward gun show dealers who willfully violate existing existing laws and regulations. He started with the admonition that if you are going to come after the government you need F15s and nuclear weapons. He framed his remarks as a response to hypothetical gun regulation resistance at the outset of the comments with a tried but jumbled Jefferson quote about the tree of liberty. So his remarks were aimed at people who think American patriotism consists at least in part of the recognition that the right to keep and bear arms is an essential component of a nation of free individuals. I take those remarks from a sitting President to be rather authoritarian and frankly chilling. What rational person would not agree that criminals should not be given easy access to firearms , who is the threat aimed at? What is the need to preface remarks in such a manner ? And to whom are they aimed , the President routinely threatens his fellow citizens with their own military ? No more posse comitatus? Gun show licensing is his Rubicon ?
  6. Speaking to 2nd Amendment concerns during a press conference “you know the thing .. you bleed the tree uh water the tree.. uh anyway if you’re gonna get at the government you come up against F15 s and nuclear weapons “ barely paraphrasing . So the context was those who may disagree with Federal gun control regulations , by whatever form whether by legislation or executive order will be met with the full force of the armed forces. Being Presidential , Biden style I suppose .
  7. POTUS threatened that political dissenters would ultimately be met with F-15s and nuclear weapons , but any political countering done in concert with religious people would be unprincipled ? Too pragmatic? We aren't 'there' yet ?
  8. When Trump said very fine people he was referring to the people on both sides of the debate surrounding the public display and or removal of Civil War monuments. In that same speech he specifically condemned any and all who participated in violence.
  9. "So much for the property and speech rights of businessmen -- and everyone else for that matter, and so much for the governor's lip service to freedom." In the context of cruise line regulation , are the 'rights' of businessmen and any other member of public being abused by the regulations eg absent strict laissez faire are rights not being protected under any form of economic regulation? I'm sure there are 'anarcap" arguments that could be made in that vein. But given the current regulation regime I see DeSantis's concerns as focused on the public and protecting their rights to interstate travel. And especially in light of the EUA status of the 'jabs', until they are recognized as fully 'legal' vaccines, the argument seems to be that you can not force someone to forego commerce because they have decided to not engage in experimental medical procedures.
  10. IF it were shown that the election results were manipulated and that Trump in fact was elected, IF that were shown to be true, why would that situation necessitate an 'armed insurrection' ? How could a call for 'reinstatement' be labeled a rebellion ? Maintaining the Biden administration in the face of factual evidence of fraud would be acting in defense of liberty? Absent proven fraud , Biden is literally the figurehead of a corrupt establishment ( tech, media, federal bureaucrats) pushing a leftist ideology in order to maintain the globalist corporate interests.
  11. Maybe what passes today as republicans got what they needed out of the past election. Republicans that hold federal offices anyway.
  12. Talk about duped nut jobs, Mike Lindell is touting a new video claiming to have PCAPs from Nov 3, all the experts say they are fake , right ?
  13. As long as we are talking about brute force things, how about dropping icy and metallic rocks on the Moon or Mars and go from there ? ps re sci fi , Neal Stephenson's Seven Eves is all about playing with orbital mechanics and fun with big floating rocks .
  14. I meant the post as a way for ET to 'see' 'objective'.
  15. Whether or not a person dis-values water, water is an objective value for human flourishing.
  16. Aren't the implications that the standard model didn't predict these 'new' values and what that then says about the standard model ?
  17. When I ran the experiment, the guy called one of those real estate outfits that buys homes for cash , liquidated all his assets and set up a rescue center for retired non winning race horses.
  18. "lies, damned lies and statistics" The list of the top ten strongest men in the world, that is the ranking of the participants in the competition of the same name , not the actually ranking of the strength of men on earth .
  19. Thanks for the clip , it’s been awhile since I’ve seen the movie, funny the scene was more violent than I remember. As I remembered it she says that line to bide her time , shift his focus ? Having just reviewed the scene that sense doesn’t seem as demonstrable but not exactly out of the realm possibility to have been her intent. Perhaps my memory of the scene colored the editing lol. ps I remember being at the video rental looking at the blurbs on the VHS cassette jackets , picking out the movie night selection (plus another selection in conjunction of my choice, because you know marriage) , when I glanced at the cast and saw the description “Val Kilmer as the ghost of Elvis” I mean , right ?
  20. Ah that trope is in play in the scene from True Romance where the character Alabama fights the mafia hit man. The hitman senses her vulnerability in being female and she uses that apprehension against him. In my opinion that scene is one of the best and in a sense most realistic scenes dramatizing female on male violence.
  21. Alabama vs James Gandolfini’s character in True Romance , all I’m sayin
  22. I tried to correct my post , we crossposted
  23. If as you say, most of the underclass is black , what do you identify as the cause ? Post 1960 black American culture ?
  24. You don't know any black people ? The above statement was posted before I saw your answer that the underclass was predominantly black and not that most black people are predominantly underclass.
  • Create New...