Jump to content
Objectivism Online Forum

Jon Letendre

Regulars
  • Posts

    413
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Jon Letendre last won the day on August 8 2024

Jon Letendre had the most liked content!

Previous Fields

  • Country
    United States
  • State (US/Canadian)
    Colorado

Profile Information

  • Interests
    I am on moderation here, "indefinitely." Moderators take weeks to approve posts, so I am effectively silenced from any realistic particpation.
    Hitting the emoticons buttons is the only participation from me that "Eioul" will tolerate.
    This was done to me when I reposted a video that an Elon Musk posted on his X account. The video clearly shows "Patriots, Q Patriots" while the voiceover says "the future belongs to ... "
    The video, and that sequence within it is newsworthy, and my posting it where and when I did, in a thread about the incoming administration, of which Trump has announced Elon will be part of, was on-topic and perfectly appropriate.
    "Eioul" (no one knows who they really are) cannot stand the utterance of Q, whether it emanates from me, or from Elon Musk.
    "Eioul's" explicit moderation policy here is that Musk and anyone else making mention of Q will NOT BE TOLERATED at OO. https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/how-have-the-mass-media-qanon-articles
    "Eioul" is a weak and vindictive loser who is motivated by hate and who is destroying open discussion at OO.

    Separately, would you expect a healthy, confident, well-adjusted person to lose their shit over... emojis?

    My formal association with Objectivism is limited to having been co-president (shared with Adam Mossoff, occasional ARI speaker and current Professor of Law at George Mason University. He wanted me to be president, and I wanted him to be president, so we settled on co-presidency) of the ARI-affiliated George Washington University Ayn Rand Club. In that capacity I attended several five, six, or so person dinners with Harry Binswanger, Nort Buechner, Edwin Locke (and the particularly obnoxious one who taught at McGill, can't recall his name) when they came to us to deliver on-campus speeches.

    If you want to see where this movement is actually having impact, check out the Atlas Society's Instagram page. 142,000 people follow their page. The comment section of their posts is lively and informative, and no one gets banned for wrong think by anonymous mentally ill moderators.

    Yours truly at Insta: mega_manly

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Jon Letendre's Achievements

Advanced Member

Advanced Member (5/7)

67

Reputation

  1. In any case, incoming members of the new administration whose issuances appear to make references to Q is a very noteworthy item worthy of discussion whether the alleged reference has merit or is purely coincidental, it is still communications from the administration's team, posted appropriately in a political discussion. Suppression is anti-reason.
  2. Such accusations took place strictly in your imagination and constitute a slander of me.
  3. I assume the fictional character "Eioul" who conceals their identity here hates these exposures because they have so much on the line intellectually, having taken the evidence-free years long staunch stance that Q and the revelations in Hillary's leaked emails are non-sense. Elon Musk embracing these themes is likely so intolerable because it suggests how foolish they have been, and for so long. Their fictional online character and the appearance of its wisdom and integrity is very important to them, no doubt.
  4. You don't even acknowledge my "People who intensely dislike these breakthroughs" from earlier. Isn't that the most neutral and sterile way of saying it? It doesn't why they dislike them so much, but just observes the manifest fact that they indeed do. Attempting to make it all about the messenger is also signature stuff in these arts.
  5. You're not following along well, but that's ok, it doesn't matter. And up yours on calling me a liar before you are even tracking. Bye.
  6. Said hate "Eioul" has made plainer than plain for years here. A hate for exposures of that crime. Just today they took down the Musk post about pizzagate. The second one I have posted has so far remained up. It's nothing more than a post from Musk about that serious and timely issue. They use their power at OO to suppress incoming administration members speaking to the public about a serious and timely issue. Explain the other plausible explanations, without insulting MY intelligence, or yours, as to why they act to suppress this issue, since you find it so unfair for me to say they hate the exposure of it?
  7. I have nothing on "Eioul," again how could I? as they operate as a fiction here, concealing their identity. I doubt Musk has anything on "Eioul," either. Thus, it makes no sense to accuse a fictional character of suppressing Musk in order that the fictional character may continue to conceal its hypothetical crimes. Therefore, I would never make the non-sensical accusation you imagined.
  8. That's some imagination. Suppression of the truth historically, such as censcorship, is always sold as for our protection. Thus, my statement to the reader. They will suppress Q here "for your protection," get it yet?
  9. Plus, how could I accuse them of anything, it isn't even possible as they are no one, they conceal their identity while they suppress views of incoming administration members like Musk who they don't like.
  10. Their hate for Q Nope. I accused no one of anything except what they have always made clear -- that they hate Q. And their belittlement of the other issue has been consistent, and fevered. They hate it being talked about, or examples being exposed. Today, they hid an example of Elon Musk raising it. They themselves have made this clear for years, their hate. I simply observe it.
  11. No, no, Trump can have one, too. I think we may find that the precedents set by our current leader (and that created no noise among the suddenly pearl-clutchingly tyranny-concerned) will carry-over often to Trump. But he should call it Office of Impending MAGA
×
×
  • Create New...