Jump to content
Objectivism Online Forum

Your thoughts on Hegelian "dialectics"?

Rate this topic


Plato

Recommended Posts

If I remember correctly the Hegalian dialectic goes in triads of thesis, antithesis, synthysis. Hegel starts his philosophy like this in this fashion: Being(thesis), Non-Being (antithesis), Becoming (synthesis). By this means he acheives in dumber, more tortured form, the conclusion that Heraclitus did over two thousand years before him. It is purely a rationalistic construct that ends with him saying that the purpose of the universe is to discover his philosophy, and that what you want (even though you don't know it) is to be a slave to the almighty state.

He applied this all across the board and applied it to history, the form of which was taken up by Karl Marx.

And if you want to reach existentialism by the Hegalian route just get rid of the thesis in that triad up there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...