Jon Letendre

We were discussing the photographic evidence of Biden's doubles, which is all over the internet and easy to examine, and Q has never to my knowledge mentioned that topic. Just making it up as you go.

Q was posting about Jeffrey Epstein, by name, and his systematic blackmailing of elites from around the world for two years prior to Epstein's arrest. That was covered on page one of this thread.

So, the proper method of validating the actuality of body doubles is to ignore direct physical evidence of it until I understand who is doing it and why? Good guys in US intelligence cannot directly communicate information implicating bad actors if said bad actors have seen to the classification of the evidence of their wrongdoings. Show me where I glamorized horoscope language.

That's fascinating. I think Q comes from good guys inside American military intelligence circles, Grames thinks it comes from bad guys inside American government circles and you seem to be suggesting it comes from conspiring Russian, Iranian and North Korean intelligence agencies.

I consider video/photographic evidence for a phenomenon as having primacy over whether or not I can figure out precise motivations for it.

Earlobes connected to cheek: Hanging earlobes not connected to cheek:

No, it was not, and I am not aware of any Q posts that should be described as "predictions," nor am I aware of any that suggested Trump would win. It was my own overly wishful thinking prediction. Q made posts leading up to the election that contemplated Biden's election, such as #4822 dated Oct 7 2020:

What do you think Q pacified people away from? That is, who would have done and/or be doing what, if it weren't for their being pacified by Q's influence?

I implied no such thing, I accurately quoted what Musk wrote in a tweet. You all by yourself imagined Musk or I was claiming it to be original to Musk.

No, it isn't. He wrote similar things but never wrote that often-attributed-to-him line. Closest he came to it that I am aware of was in an interview he said, "The glory which is built upon a lie soon becomes a most unpleasant incumbrance. ... How easy it is to make people believe a lie, and how hard it is to undo that work again!"

"The U.S. Virgin Islands filed a suit this week against JPMorgan Chase, accusing the financial institution of turning a "blind eye" and aiding in the "concealment" of the late Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking crimes." Virgin Islands suit accuses JPMorgan of turning 'blind eye' to Epstein trafficking | Washington Examiner

Elon Musk on Twitter: "@catturd2 Easy to fool people, but it is almost impossible to convince people that they have been fooled" / Twitter

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1606631325179731968?cxt=HHwWgIDT5bGr88ssAAAA "We should think of various explanations for any given event in terms of probabilities, not certainties. Those who don't allow any questioning of the narrative at all are full of shit." -Elon Musk

Frank, "A consciousness conscious of nothing but itself" does not argue against a meditating consciousness that previously matured in the context of a physical world. Rather, it argues against the sensibility of proposing consciousness in the absence of any physical existence, without any exposure to physical existence, ever. Your consciousness matured in a physical world, was previously exposed to rich physical experience, and thereby can now "spin its wheels" so to say, experience itself without any particular focus, in a meditative state.

I've seldom seen someone get so feverish and exercised as you do about nothing. (I mean,) shouldn't you be more interested in elsewhere discussing something? (I mean,) you've said like seventeen times that it's palm-reading and have nothing else to contribute.

https://brownstone.org/articles/the-loneliest-generation/

Elon Musk confirms FBI paid Twitter to suppress facts about Hunter Biden's business dealings in Ukraine and more: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1605219914813673473?cxt=HHwWgsDQjb_A8cYsAAAA

Maybe later. Greg has taken down some of my posts. Maybe after that's resolved.

Easy Truth believes Q claims that President Kennedy's son is still alive. Here is post 2611 dated Dec 12 2018. Any trouble deciphering it?

You looked at the small handful of Q posts below that return from the search term "epstein" and you can't figure the meaning of any of them? Q (qanon.pub)

In 1964 Ayn Rand wrote in ""Extremism," or The Art of Smearing," "The basic and crucial political issue of our age is capitalism versus socialism, or freedom versus statism. For decades this issue has been silenced, suppressed, evaded, [...]" Do you suppose that she used the term suppressed to claim that the capitalism vs socialism issue was, for many previous decades, nowhere discussed, was literally wiped away, nowhere to be found? “Extremism,” or The Art of Smearing (aynrand.org)

Most Q posts are simple pointers to factual but suppressed information that the reader can independently research and confirm.

Here Musk Tweets with replies by Elon Musk (@elonmusk) / Twitter affirms that Twitter executives refused to address child exploitation occurring on the Twitter platform: Here Musk affirms that Twitter executives knew that children were being trafficked utilizing the Twitter platform: Elon Musk on Twitter: "@laralogan Indeed. Shame on them!" / Twitter

Correct, you read the original source material directly. Thank you. I never claimed comparable writing styles. Are you seriously not able to get the gist after reading the small handful of Epstein-related Q posts below? It's all too vague and unclear? Seriously? Q (qanon.pub)

OK, then going online and finding some videos claiming to be about Ayn Rand is a proper way to inform oneself about the content of her ideas?