dianahsieh Posted February 28, 2008 Report Share Posted February 28, 2008 By Diana from NoodleFood,cross-posted by MetaBlog Here's a quick letter to my state representatives that I wrote in early February on a proposed bill to restrict abortion by requiring ultrasounds: From: Diana Hsieh <Diana.Hsieh(at)Colorado.edu> Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2008 13:59:56 -0700 Subject: SB 95 Dear Senators, It is my understanding that SB 95 will be heard in the Senate State, Veterans, & Military Affairs Committee on Monday. The bill would require "a physician to provide information regarding an ultrasound to a woman prior to the woman's decision whether to have an abortion." I urge you to oppose this bill. Colorado ought not impose any such restrictions on abortion. The purpose of the bill is not to require genuine informed consent. Every woman who chooses to have an abortion knows that she is destroying a potential (but not actual) human being -- not a shoe, plant, or a hippo. She violates no rights in doing so. She ought not be forced to look at pictures. So the sole purpose of the bill is be to make abortion more costly. It is part of an attempt by foes of abortion to regulate it out of existence, since they cannot ban it out right. All such attempts [are] morally wrong. They ought to be opposed. Diana Hsieh Ph.D Candidate, Philosophy University of Colorado, Boulder Diana.Hsieh(at)Colorado.edu Ari Armstrong has more details in this blog post. http://ObjectivismOnline.com/archives/003341.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.