Jump to content
Objectivism Online Forum

Does one have a "responsibility to others"?

Rate this topic


epistemologue

Recommended Posts

Do I believe that "one has a responsibility to others"?

Well let me lay out a chain of ideas explaining how I would agree with that statement, and how I would disagree with that statement.

First, how I would agree with that statement. Being an egoist, my terminal value is *my own* happiness. However, as a person it is very natural for others' happiness to be an instrumental value for acheiving my own happiness. I would even go so far as to say having a good society is an instrumental value to my own happiness. As an egoist, my only "responsibility" is ultimately for my own happiness, but by means of these instrumental values I have in others, there is certainly some derived responsibility I have to others, and even to society.

Now how I would disagree with that statement. As an egoist, I do not believe that another's need, as such, is a valid claim on me. For example, if there is someone who chooses to live non-productively by mooching or stealing from others (i.e. providing no value to myself, nor to society for that matter), I would not feel responsible for maintaining that kind of life for someone at my expense. Even if you're a collectivist utilitarian it seems to be irrational to keep feeding a non-productive person by means of taking value from a productive person. Now as a caveat, suppose there is some charitable organization that was capable of rehabilitating people like this. Depending on the efficacy of that kind of philanthropy, I may weigh it to be in my favor (and thus view it as a responsibility) to donate some amount to that charity to help people like this recover.

I think that the calculations from a utilitarian egoist and the calculations from a utilitarian collectivist often come out with a similar result.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It sounds like the answer lies in your explanation.

The "responsibility to others" is instrumental in achieving your own happiness. By recognizing that aiding someone to be a mooch or thief is not in your interest, you are establishing the criteria by which you choose individuals or groups to be philanthropic toward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...