-
Content Count
343 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
12
epistemologue last won the day on November 12 2017
epistemologue had the most liked content!
About epistemologue
-
Rank
Member
Previous Fields
-
Country
United States
-
Chat Nick
epistemologue
-
Relationship status
No Answer
-
Sexual orientation
Straight
-
Copyright
Copyrighted
-
Experience with Objectivism
Atlas Shrugged, The Fountainhead, Anthem, Philosophy: Who Needs It?, Virtue of Selfishness, The Romantic Manifesto, Objectivism: The Philosophy of Ayn Rand, and others.
Profile Information
-
Gender
Male
Recent Profile Visitors
7338 profile views
-
splitprimary reacted to a post in a topic: The Tactics and Threat of the Alt-Right
-
epistemologue reacted to a post in a topic: The Law of Identity
-
epistemologue reacted to a post in a topic: The Law of Identity
-
epistemologue reacted to a post in a topic: The Law of Identity
-
Again, they could only be "perfectly entitled" to those things on the premise of nihilism and relativism in aesthetics and morality. If instead, these norms follow from their metaphysical base, then nobody who doesn't have that biological foundation could legitimately claim any of the norms which follow from it.
-
Very well said, and unfortunately we see exactly this sort of subjectivism even among prominent "Objectivists" like Diana Hsieh, http://www.philosophyinaction.com/blog/?p=14774&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+noodlefood+(NoodleFood) This view of one's own mind as an unintelligible black hole, an unreasonable force of emotions, is actually quite sad... Ayn Rand did a lot of work to describe the connection between reason and emotions (especially in The Romantic Manifesto, as well as in Atlas Shrugged). She taught how one can understand their ow
-
epistemologue reacted to a post in a topic: The Law of Identity
-
epistemologue reacted to a post in a topic: The Law of Identity
-
I would just like to make a point regarding aesthetic ideals and utilitarian optimization. You are trying to say that there is no meaningful connection between one's biology and one's behavior. I would say that is a form of nihilism and relativism in the realms of aesthetics and morality which is quite contrary to the philosophy of Objectivism. Starting from the metaphysically given, in this case one's biological sex, there are going to be certain choices which are more or less consistent with the ideal aesthetic form and with the optimal utilitarian function for the person with said meta
-
The materialist conceptions of concepts, learning, and so on, have a very limited meaning, and can only produce limited results for that reason. "Learning" is the accumulation of regularities, and statistical estimates from there. "Concepts" are bundles of correlated properties grouped together according to statistical or pragmatic standards. A more Aristotelean or Objectivist conception of concepts or learning have a stronger meaning, and can produce much stronger results when implemented. Concepts are universals, which classify all units of a kind, and have a logical definition based o
-
I think there is a valid concern here, but not in the way you're suggesting. I think there are practical, technological consequences to having a correct or incorrect philosophy. A philosophy based on materialist premises is going to imply a nominalist approach in epistemology, which as a technical approach, will lead to inappropriate forms of knowledge representation (e.g. Humean bundles of properties), and bad methods of inductive learning (e.g. cataloging statistical regularities).
-
Harrison Danneskjold reacted to a post in a topic: The Audit
-
here you agreed with my characterization of you as a "positive utilitarian", despite having just said I don't anymore think that position is correct
-
epistemologue reacted to a post in a topic: Metaphysics of Death
-
Easy Truth reacted to a post in a topic: The Humanitarian with the Trolley
-
Easy Truth reacted to a post in a topic: The Humanitarian with the Trolley
-
CartsBeforeHorses reacted to a post in a topic: Determinism and free will
-
Can a button be added to the top banner like it used to be? https://tlk.io/objectivismonlinechat
-
epistemologue reacted to a post in a topic: Meaning of the newborn cry
-
epistemologue reacted to a post in a topic: Does death give life meaning? Does happiness require struggling to survive?
-
@JASKN have you had any chance to look at PHPFreeChat? or anything I can do to help? I'd love to get a chat back up here on OO again. maybe we could even do a regularly scheduled chat meetup on Sunday nights or something like that.
-
Plasmatic I comprehended the argument before I read Scott Ryan. The mini-critique of Oist epistemology in this thread was written before I'd ever heard of the book. Oist epistemology is broken and it's conclusions are unjustified. I'll have to take whatever this necessarily commits me to, if it's Platonic Forms with "bizarre abilities" - then they aren't so bizarre, if they are necessary for the justification of knowledge, are they? But I have no idea if that sort of thing is in the cards or not.
-
It makes any general knowledge or induction unjustifiable. I don't know if I can say much more than I already have, I haven't studied enough metaphysics. In my opinion, Objectivism has a fundamental problem in metaphysics, and it's a fracture which runs through and corrupts the entire philosophy. I agree with Scott Ryan on that. I am still in the midst of reading his book. I don't know how much else I agree with him on (it may be a lot or a little), he seems to be "Absolute Idealist", which is some kind of Hegelian thing that I simply don't understand. I'm going to put forth a legitimate ef
-
I'm not saying that everything metaphysically given to us needs explanation *in order to exist*... are you serious? I'm telling you that without some metaphysically real universality, any identity between two units of a concept is logically inconsistent with one's premises. That is, on the metaphysical premise that everything that exists is particular, there is no *shared* identity between particulars.
-
epistemologue reacted to a post in a topic: IPS Chat Discontinued
-
Eiuol reacted to a post in a topic: IPS Chat Discontinued
-
ah I see. I'll look for another option.