Jump to content
Objectivism Online Forum

Jon Letendre

Regulars
  • Posts

    107
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by Jon Letendre

  1. Foxhunt is related to Biden in that his family is blackmailed and controlled by the Chinese who routinely grossly violate rights of our citizens and they do it within our borders. He is not just in bed with anyone, he is in bed with the sub-human monsters who commit Foxhunt. And I did not use the Foxhunt announcement as some kind of validation of Q. You are free to do that, I did not, I only mentioned some facts. I repeat them: Demers used a phrase that any and all law-enforcement familiar with Q would well know we have been using extensively for years; memeing it, blasting it. It is not a common phrase. It is quite ubiquitous in the movement, however. All these are facts, plain and simple. Only you can decide if they indicate or suggest anything at all. (See the movie theater meme made by anons and reposted by Q, here: https://qanon.pub post 4866, Oct 14, just 18 days ago: I mention that Bobulinski enjoys Energy Dept Q-level security access because words such as “fantasy” were being thrown around with abandon following my posts. I am simply checking whether people understand this is another plain and simple fact, but I can’t tell yet just how firmly lodged some heads are, how disconnected from reality they are, so I start with basics. No one but you has acknowledged any of these basic facts so far that I have seen. I have not brought Q into it. Bobulinski’s security access is two-fold relevant: 1) There really are people with Q-level security access destroying enemies of America, as we speak. This is confirmed now. (The creator(s) of the posts here: https://qanon.pub may or may not enjoy Q-level security access.) Patriots (the first one, Bobulinski) with Q-level security clearances are coming forward with private information previously held in confidence to wreck traitors to America. That’s a fact, now. 2) His possession of Q-level access implies extremely high character and supports the reliability of his claims.
  2. It doesn’t hurt me at all. It does tell a lot about people who immediately wield it and their actual confidence.
  3. Is every Objectivist activist of 30+ years who posts here immediately invited to get the hell out or go to hell or asked why they are even here in the first place, as I was? Is it routine to question their mental health, as was perpetrated against myself?
  4. Thank Heaven we didn't get sidetracked from the real subject of the thread by discussing Bobulinski's extensive hard evidence against the Biden Crime Family or his Q-level security clearance and the heavy vetting of this person which that implies.
  5. Thank you for that suggestion, maybe I will start a new thread. However, with certainty the Bobulinski story is directly related to Biden and his fitness for President, the subject of the thread. Also, to be clear, Bobulinski's possession of Energy Department Q-level security access is a matter of fact, as well as the Foxhunt "conspiracy," which is a legal term used at least twice by Assistant Attorney General Demers in explaining what the five (and more to come) were arrested for. See video at 3:58 and 4:24, for example. Both are established facts, there is nothing speculative about either.
  6. United States immigration laws predate Trump by many decades. Generally, they were passed with bi-partisan support. He swore an oath to uphold the law. (And the terrible cages were built by the Obama/Biden administration.)
  7. Foxhunt Conspiracy. How does one justify voting for Joe Biden who is in bed with and owned by the Chinese Communist Party which torments and terrorizes innocent people worldwide and in the US as described here by Assistant Attorney General Demers, FBI Director Wray and US Attorney DuCharme? https://www.pscp.tv/w/1yNGaBgvnjXJj How does one justify enabling the anti-life CCP by handing them the Presidency of the United States?
  8. No one has to discuss Q or anything else if they don't want to. About Bobulinksi, though. Is anyone here prepared to argue that he did not in fact enjoy Energy Dept Q-level security clearance during his career in the United States Navy?
  9. He was a Naval officer with Energy Department Q-level security clearance and corresponding responsibilities for the nuclear weapons on our submarines.
  10. All military, as well. Their oath prevents them allowing a traitor in office. LOL
  11. And like I said, we already you hate you the Trump movement.
  12. Indeed, he is totally owned by the Communist Party that has tormented billions of people for generations. Trump swore an oath to defend the Constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic, so he can not and will not allow Biden to assume the Presidency. The Biden Crime Family and the rest of the filthy Washington swamp will be dealt with appropriately in Trump's glorious second term, all backed up by the newly-legitimate Supreme Court.
  13. Q (there is no such thing as "QAnon") is merely one wheel on the Trump Train, which we already knew you hate.
  14. * * * * * Split from Biden is our only hope, say Yaron Brook * * * * * Today the DOJ announced charges and arrests in the Foxhunt Conspiracy. The DOJ official says "the hunters became the hunted" at 3:00. Watch here: https://www.pscp.tv/w/1yNGaBgvnjXJj When did Q start saying that? How many times has Q said it? See here: https://qanon.pub/ The phrase is ubiquitous in the movement, has been for years.
  15. Never forget that some among us correctly understand there is indeed a gun at their heads and it is held by Trump and the threat for them evaporates should a Biden or a Harris or a Clinton assume the Presidency. They will say many things but they are not going to tell you the above as exposure is precisely what they seek to avoid.
  16. The issue is about what to call a duly convicted murderer who has been released, he is a murderer. This is about objective identification. Same for felons. The justice system must never forget what they did, what they are. Nor will I. Never release a man convicted of murder is fine with me, but no I wouldn’t say it is required to qualify as proper government. This is very fine me, third one this year, scheduled in about five weeks.: https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/execution-scheduled-federal-death-row-inmate-convicted-murdering-child
  17. Those do sound less serious. I agree the law should be changed because a handful of those 3rd degree felonies should only be misdemeanors or even not crimes at all. Not a great choice, agreed. Word Nazi? Like forcing you to use honest words? Never! In fact I look forward to your use of ‘ex-murderer’ once it becomes fashionable.
  18. For those with no issue with Bloomberg’s actions: The fines were imposed following a legitimate judicial process and trial by a jury of peers. The fines were intended to be suffered by the guilty, just as their terms in prison were intended to be suffered by the guilty. Would you have any issue with a charity volunteer doing the time in prison in place of the actual, guilty felon? If yes, why exactly are you happy to nullify a legitimate judicial punishment (monetary portion) but not the imprisonment portion? You can’t say to keep Society safe because these are non-violent felons, the imprisonment is purely about punishment, just like the fines. What is the justification for nullifying the judicial process and allowing volunteeers to lessen the punishments of those found guilty of serious crimes?
  19. Do you say “a person who has served time for murder and is now free” when you refer to a murderer? They are felons.
  20. Yet Bloomberg restored only a very small fraction of 1.5 million, because he was very selective. That selectivity will form the essence of election fraud charges against him after Trump begins his second term. Bloomberg is willing to do this because he is fighting for his life, he simply will not survive the purge of criminal scum that is coming in term two.
  21. Felonies are serious crimes. Traffic tickets are not felonies. There is no such thing as an “ex-felon,” just as there is no such thing as an “ex-murderer,” (except for a murderer who is no longer breathing.) Living felons are felons, period.
  22. "Ex-felon" is an interesting term. Felonies are serious crimes and felons were found guilty by juries of their peers. Does a murderer become an "ex-murderer" after their term in prison for their latest murder?
  23. What's coming next for the left, the Democrat Party, the mainstream news, Hollywood, social media companies and the globalist elite will not be affected in any meaningful way by the assassination or natural death of Donald Trump, except to trigger contingency planning that will fast-track their destruction and make it much more brutal.
  24. And sunny days only, too! You saw the thoughts on this matter from the head of the Executive Branch of the US government. Every day he is briefed on yet more information that you and I will never know about. But let's see if Bloomberg keeps it up or never does it again.
  25. In any case I don't think Bloomberg will be charged with indiscriminately paying fines and fees imposed upon and intended to be suffered by the individual criminals, which is probably not a crime. Rather, I think he only paid the fines and fees of those felons who are Democrats or known to vote Democrat and he thereby can be charged with election interference. Top law enforcement officer of the land says ... My bet is on Bloomberg not doing any more of it.
×
×
  • Create New...