KevinDW78 Posted April 25, 2008 Report Share Posted April 25, 2008 http://www.popularmechanics.com/automotive...rs/4217016.html This line pisses me off: Of course, the Air Car will likely never hit American shores, especially considering its all-glue construction. Thank you our ever-protective, nanny-state government. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aequalsa Posted April 25, 2008 Report Share Posted April 25, 2008 http://www.popularmechanics.com/automotive...rs/4217016.html This line pisses me off: Thank you our ever-protective, nanny-state government. Thanks, I'll think of that fact twice a week when I drop $130 each time to fill up my tank. I'm thinking that for the grand a month I spend on gas I could afford really nice titanium armor plating to make it more safe. I wonder if they would make an exception? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve D'Ippolito Posted April 25, 2008 Report Share Posted April 25, 2008 But now there is an update--a 1000 mile range car capable of over 90 MPH coming here? http://www.popularmechanics.com/automotive....html?series=19 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Wrath Posted April 26, 2008 Report Share Posted April 26, 2008 There's bound to be some reason why these things will not become widespread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chops Posted April 26, 2008 Report Share Posted April 26, 2008 There's bound to be some reason why these things will not become widespread. I would guess that it would be the threat of damage if the tank is ruptured. 4350psi is an incredible amount of pressure. Maybe I'm wrong and they can store it quite stably. I don't know. Either way, I think it's neat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KevinDW78 Posted April 26, 2008 Author Report Share Posted April 26, 2008 I would guess that it would be the threat of damage if the tank is ruptured. 4350psi is an incredible amount of pressure. Maybe I'm wrong and they can store it quite stably. I don't know. Either way, I think it's neat. I believe the tank is made out of carbon fiber material, making it much stronger (and lighter) than a conventional metal tank. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Olufemi Posted May 19, 2008 Report Share Posted May 19, 2008 High pressure tanks are arguably safer than the thin plastic containers of explosives that we carry around every day...gasoline, gas tank? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
y_feldblum Posted May 20, 2008 Report Share Posted May 20, 2008 There's bound to be some reason why these things will not become widespread. At 75hp, I should think so! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chops Posted May 20, 2008 Report Share Posted May 20, 2008 thin plastic containers of explosives that we carry around every day...gasoline, gas tank? Liquid gasoline is quite stable, requiring heat to explode and put the vehicle under any pressure. Diesel is even more stable, which requires much more heat to ignite (you can't ignite diesel with a hand lighter, for example). For gasoline that to be a threat, you require oxygen, a flame or spark, and a ruptured tank, and even then, it'll mostly just burn, and not explode. Really, how often do you hear of cars actually exploding (not counting movies, obviously). Conversely, with the Air Car you have a 4500psi tank and if that ruptures at all, that pressure has to go somewhere, and four thousand pounds isn't something to sneeze at. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gags Posted May 20, 2008 Report Share Posted May 20, 2008 Another thread on air-powered cars: http://forum.ObjectivismOnline.com/index.php?showtopic=10585 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inspector Posted May 20, 2008 Report Share Posted May 20, 2008 At 75hp, I should think so! Thank you - someone finally said it! I think it's pretty obvious that the market demand is only so great for technologies that haven't moved past the clown car stage. I wouldn't chalk this one up to government oppression just yet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matus1976 Posted May 21, 2008 Report Share Posted May 21, 2008 I'm quite skeptical of their performance claims. Compressed gas might work well for regenerative braking, but as a long distance energy storage medium...? Even at 4500 psi, I'll wait to see some official specs and tests, not 'estimates' If you're going to compress a gas, why not just use hydrogen, since you can burn it. Even with a compressed gas you can burn, it's still very difficult to get the ranges that a typical gasoline vehicle can get with any decent sized gas tank. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.