Jump to content
Objectivism Online Forum

AlexL

Regulars
  • Posts

    758
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    44

AlexL last won the day on March 4

AlexL had the most liked content!

2 Followers

Profile Information

  • Location
    Fribourg, Switzerland
  • Gender
    Male

Contact Methods

  • ICQ
    0
  • Website URL
    http://

Previous Fields

  • Sexual orientation
    Straight
  • Relationship status
    Married
  • State (US/Canadian)
    Not Specified
  • Country
    Switzerland
  • Copyright
    Copyrighted
  • Real Name
    Alex Leibovici
  • School or University
    M.Sc. Physics
  • Occupation
    Retired

Recent Profile Visitors

6261 profile views

AlexL's Achievements

Senior Member

Senior Member (6/7)

129

Reputation

  1. You mean the 2022 Amnesty International report? Yes, you are correct, I did not address this and I regret it. I focused on your denial of the principle/rule that, in a rational debate one has the obligation to justify one's claims, if asked. I looked back on your older comments in this thread and I found out that now is not the first time that you deny the legitimacy of this rule. OK, now about your argumentation with this report. I asked you to provide facts justifying your claims/conclusions. But instead of facts, you pointed me to a source claiming those same conclusions. Yes, I guess that that 280 pages report does list some facts in support of its conclusion, but the problem is : if I disagree with the truth o those facts and/or conclusions, to whom I address my objections? Therefore: take your claims one by one and justify them. (Besides, by unreservedly recommending the AI report, you will also have to justify/prove every one of its claims, if asked. This is how it works!) Here is a freešŸ˜advice for you: Only by researching a subject yourself can you justify your claims; merely reproducing the conclusions of others risks embarrassment.
  2. šŸ˜ Don't be insolent: it is not about "educating" me, but about justifying your claims. This is your moral obligation in a rational debate, especially on this forum.
  3. šŸ¤£šŸ¤£šŸ¤£ I suppose you can justify each of your claims with - sourced - facts; otherwise, you wouldn't be expressing them on this forum, would you? Then please do.
  4. Boydstun is not smearing you. The problem is in your head. Urgently go out and seek psychiatric help.
  5. Why does nobody care about a massive terrorist threat to the United States and against my own life? Follow your mother's advice. Use your intelligence: you have nothing to lose. She certainly wishes you the best. She is not participating in the conspiracy. Neither am I or @Boydstun
  6. There is only essentially one. Which is...?
  7. ... there "advice " is complete nonsense There is no reason for them ALL to wish you harm. Follow their advice. Especially if all of them have the same advice.
  8. You did not explain why your friends and family won't help you. Or you simply don't want to follow their advice?
  9. I've contacted all those people myself, and nobody will respond. My point was precisely for you to let the police determine which is the appropriate organism you should contact for help, and not for you to decide this. How do they explain this refusal?
  10. I thought I was clear: I did not recommend that you contact the police to solve the problem, but to direct you the the appropriate competent authorities/organisms.
  11. The "help facility" needed is the protection of the federal government. Then call them, see to what help facility they direct you, and keep me posted. TIA
  12. Call the police. They will direct you to the appropriate help facility
×
×
  • Create New...