-
Content Count
4091 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
13
JMeganSnow last won the day on October 15 2019
JMeganSnow had the most liked content!
About JMeganSnow
-
Rank
Dragon Lady
- Birthday 10/26/1979
Previous Fields
-
Country
United States
-
State (US/Canadian)
Ohio
-
Chat Nick
Notorious JEN
-
Interested in meeting
Sure.
-
Relationship status
Single
-
Sexual orientation
Straight
-
Real Name
Jennifer Snow
-
Copyright
Copyrighted
-
Occupation
Proto-novelist
Contact Methods
-
AIM
SaneJenni
- MSN
-
Website URL
http://literatrix.blogspot.com
-
ICQ
375656773
-
Yahoo
jennifer.snow250
Profile Information
-
Gender
Female
-
Location
Dayton, OH
-
Interests
reading, writing, philosophy, computers, computer games, RPG's, art, movies, food
Recent Profile Visitors
30508 profile views
-
AlexL reacted to a post in a topic: Would an object be invisible if traveling faster than light?
-
Easy Truth reacted to a post in a topic: Psychological Visibility
-
dream_weaver reacted to a post in a topic: Million Dollar Baby
-
Harrison Danneskjold reacted to a post in a topic: How Do You Show Your Objectivist Flair?
-
human_murda reacted to a post in a topic: Iron Man
-
Actually, no, because concepts like matter and energy belong to the specific sciences, not philosophy. Dealing with these terms in a philosophical treatise would be rampantly anti-hierarchical and produce nothing but confusion.
-
Just curious, why is this in the Questions forum? It's not a question.
-
JMeganSnow changed their profile photo
-
Actually, Harry Binswanger already wrote quite a lengthy treaties on this called The Biological Basis of Telelogical Concepts (which I should really get around to reading sometime).
-
Boydstun reacted to a post in a topic: Where do I look to meet people?
-
William O reacted to a post in a topic: Where do I look to meet people?
-
JASKN reacted to a post in a topic: Where do I look to meet people?
-
softwareNerd reacted to a post in a topic: Where do I look to meet people?
-
Jenni: I currently have no friends at all and would love to have people in my life (my real, physical, real-world life) that I can share and discuss my values (objectivism and capitalism) with. What can I do to find such friends in real life? I live on the east side of Indianapolis. Closely related: I have been studying economics on my own and have been thinking I should major in it since I enjoy learning about it so much and it might put me in touch with other pro-capitalist people. On the other hand, given the schools that dominate the econ departments today, I'm thinking
-
Dear Jenni I am a Norwegian High-School student, and would like to apply for an international program course (International Baccalaureate) my second and third High-School year. The Norwegian government is very restrictive and heavily regulates the Norwegian school system (the quality is thereafter), and this is one of the few opportunities I actually have to escape from their system. To do so I have to apply and my grades are most important in this regard. My grade in English is, obviously, most important since I am applying to an international school program. It is often possible t
-
Increasing Awareness of Mortality
JMeganSnow replied to JMeganSnow's topic in Jenni Answers Your Questions
Also, it's perfectly all right to occasionally experience negative emotions about growing old and dying. In my experience, the goal is not to perfectly eradicate all bad feelings (which may be impossible and induce unnecessary guilt), but to master them so that they don't come to dominate and squelch the good ones. -
Time for another question! "How can I best deal with friends or even romantic partners with low self-esteem who are still a positive value? The type of low self-esteem I'm talking about is where the person has periods of reclusiveness and are difficult for me to talk to, and express reasons that look like low self-esteem." -- Louie So, if I'm understanding this correctly, you're talking about someone who talks down about themselves or is excessively self-deprecating, and that annoys you and otherwise undermines what would be a positive relationship? Well, like the previous question, t
-
So, time to kick off this Advice thing. If you have a question for me--specific and personal are best--throw it out there and I'll answer it as best I can (eventually). I don't pretend to be an expert on anything in particular, so what's the point of this exercise, you may ask? It's really for me to do my best to show *how* I arrive at my notions. Why is this instructive or of any value? Because the hardest part of answering any particular issue about life is in deciding what is and isn't *essential*. You have to go from the particular (your problem) to the abstract (the essential princi
-
Heya folks, I just finished editing a new novel by an Objectivist Author entitled Jason Crane: Bridge of Bones. It's a Sleepy Hollow/Headless Horseman mythology novel and it was so much fun to work on that I just want to share it with everybody! If you're a fan of fantasy/ghost stories, please check it out, you'll be supporting a fellow Objectivist who is just getting started on his novel-writing career: Book 1 link Book 2 link
-
Here's one that was submitted to me: "How can I best deal with friends or even romantic partners with low self-esteem who are still a positive value? The type of low self-esteem I'm talking about is where the person has periods of reclusiveness and are difficult for me to talk to, and express reasons that look like low self-esteem."
-
Yeah, I've been busy with stuff so I haven't been active on the forum in quite a while. Time to fix that!
-
The illusion of volition(AKA free will)
JMeganSnow replied to Tsiklon's topic in Metaphysics and Epistemology
It's axiomatic--you can't prove it in the sense of deriving it logically from something else (because the process of logical identification depends on it), but you can validate it, in the sense of pointing out the things that lead to the recognition of it existing. You have to be pretty naive to think that volition means the ability to choose free from any constraints. Of course there are constraints. The existence of constraints doesn't mean that you lack the ability to direct your consciousness within those constraints, though. -
Personally, I consider this sort of thing to be locking the barn door after the horse was stolen--too late, and missing the point. Nothing can fix human nature, and ultimately nothing can create or preserve a good culture but a good philosophy. Draconian voting rules will neither help create it nor retard its decay. Politics is a derivative, not a primary, and thus can't be fundamentally manipulated via a top-down enforced approach. There's a reason why "grassroots" is such a big deal--once there is a popular movement about something, attempts to fight it are doomed. I grant that my per
-
I know a number of world-class people who are quite crude in their language, and I vastly prefer them to uptight concrete-bound prudes. Better advice would be "don't date close-minded women with radically different standards". I know a number of men who see this kind of behavior on the woman's part as inevitable, something they have to cater to in order to get laid. It's not. Nor should this kind of behavior be catered to. I also know a fair number of guys who associate being a concrete-bound uptight prude with being "feminine", so they're actually not happy with a female who doesn't beha
-
Erm . . . that's an excessive generalization. I know heterosexual women who don't have this particular type of craving. It may be a *common* value but it's not *universal*. As for the whole "do women test men or not" thing . . . of course we do. Not necessarily in a manipulative way, it's just a matter of course. If you're in new a relationship with someone, you're going to have to react to tons of new situations, and if you react badly, yes, the woman will negatively evaluate you for it. If one of your friends makes an obscene comment in her hearing and she totally goes off on him, yo